EDITORIAL POLICY

Preprints 

Authors may submit manuscripts to SciELO Preprints before or in parallel with submission to CoDAS. Preprints do not undergo formal peer review on the open-access preprint server operated by the SciELO Program. In these cases, the manuscript is automatically uploaded if it meets the basic selection criteria or is approved after basic evaluation by the editors of the manuscript area and will receive a DOI assigned by SciELO Preprints. CoDAS may also submit a manuscript already approved in the final evaluation, editing, or publication process. In the publication, the manuscript is automatically uploaded and will have the same DOI as the final article.

Peer review process

The evaluation process for manuscripts submitted to the CoDAS journal consists of 3 stages:

1. Technical evaluation

All submitted articles are checked against the requirements described in the submission guidelines. Those that do not comply or do not present all the requested documents are returned to the authors with indications for adaptation. Articles that comply with the guidelines and are accompanied by all the necessary documents move on to the next stage.

2. Assessment of scope and interest

Articles approved in the technical evaluation will be forwarded to the Editors-in-Chief, together with the similarity report (via iThenticate). At this time, they will be evaluated for similarity, scientific validity, thematic-methodological compliance (within the editorial policy of the CoDAS journal), and publication priorities at the time of submission. In this case, the editorial decision for the manuscript may be an “Immediate Rejection”. Articles with potential for publication proceed to peer review.

3. Peer review

The articles received are evaluated according to the peer review policy, involving at least two reviewers from the research area, from national and international educational and/or research institutions, with proven scientific production. The CoDAS journal adopts a double-blind peer review; reviewers do not access the authors' identification and vice-versa. Manuscripts may receive an opinion of “Approved”, “minor modifications”, “major modifications”, or “Rejected”. Opinions of rejection or acceptance with modifications are always accompanied by the reviewers' evaluation. After the necessary corrections and possible suggestions, the article will be accepted if it has two favorable opinions. In the event of conflicting opinions, one of the Associate Editors of the specific area may be consulted.

Informed peer review

Informed peer review Also in line with open science practices, the CoDAS journal discloses the names of the responsible Editor(s) at the time of publication of the article. This practice reinforces the journal's commitment to the integrity of the editorial process and provides recognition to the editors for their crucial role in maintaining the quality standards of the publication. The opinions of the reviewers may be published with the article, with the identification of the reviewers if they agree. In addition, reviewers have the option to reveal their identities after the manuscript is approved if they agree with that.

Adherence to these practices is voluntary and seeks to promote an open and transparent evaluation environment, respecting the confidentiality preferences of those involved.

Open data

Authors who make raw data available for articles published in CoDAS must inform where the data is available in this section. Authors are encouraged to make these materials available in open access repositories. If published in one of these repositories, they should declare the repository and URL to access the available material.

Article Processing Fees, after approval for publication

Articles approved for publication must pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) at the time of acceptance.

Criteria for exemption from the fee:

Authors who are active members of the SBFa will be exempt from the fee for 1 (one) approved article per volume. At least 1 (one) author must be an active member of the SBFa in the “professional member” category. When there are more than one member author, the annual fee benefit of which author will be used in the respective publication must be indicated.

• Brazilian authors (SBFa members)

From the 2nd article published in the same year, there is a benefit of 50% discount on the processing fee

• Original and Review articles: R$ 500

• Notes (other types of article): R$ 300

• Brazilian authors (non-SBFa members)

  • Original and Review articles: R$ 1000

  • Notes (other types of articles): R$ 600

• International authors

  • Original articles and review: USD 300

  • Notes (other types of articles): USD 150

Payment of the processing fee will only take place after authors receive the acceptance letter, via private link. This APC payment policy is valid for articles submitted from October 1, 2024.

Ethics and Misconduct Policy, Errata and Retraction

CoDAS follows strict ethical standards in research, including the need for approval by Research Ethics Committees and Informed Consent from Participants. The journal does not tolerate any form of scientific misconduct, such as plagiarism, falsification or creation of data, and will take appropriate action in case of suspicion or proof of such practices.

CoDAS complies with the principles and good practices on ethics and negligence for scientific publications. COPE and the SciELO Manual of Good Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publication are recommended.

Errata: in case of errors identified after the publication of an article, CoDAS will publish an errata with the necessary corrections, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the scientific information published. We recommend the Guide for the registration, marking and publication of Errata.

Retraction: In exceptional situations, such as the identification of serious errors or scientific misconduct that compromise the validity of the conclusions of an article, the CoDAS journal may retract the work. The retraction will be duly communicated to readers and indexers, and the article will remain available online with a note indicating the retraction and its reasons. We recommend a Guide for registering, marking and publishing retraction.

Conflict of Interest Policy

Conflicts of interest may be personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial in nature. Conflicts of interest may occur when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that may influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts. Detail any potential conflicts of interest of the authors in relation to the research. If any of the authors receive funding from institutions or have institutional affiliations that conflict with the integrity of the research results, it should be explicitly stated in this section.

Adoption of similarity checking software

The CoDAS journal uses the Ithenticate system to identify text similarities that may be considered plagiarism. It is important to note that the content of the manuscripts is the responsibility of the authors. The articles are checked at the time of submission. If there is evidence of significant similarity between the manuscript and other documents, the authors are advised to review the manuscript and resubmit it.

Diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility policies, Sex and Gender Issues

The CoDAS journal is fully committed to the principles of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility – DEIA - Diversidade, Equidade, Inclusão e Acessibilidade  (https://www1.abecbrasil.org.br/deia/).

Manuscripts submitted to the CoDAS journal must comply with the principles of the Guideline on Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER). According to this guideline, the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) must be used carefully to avoid confusion of meaning. It is worth highlighting that inclusion and accessibility policies in general are among the sensitive and important topics of the CoDAS journal. To ensure the accessibility of the content of its publications, CoDAS is concerned with publishing in media that allow for adjustments in font size, contrast and use of a text reader.

Ethics Committee

Authors must attach a statement of approval from the ethics committee of the institution responsible for approving the research, when applicable.

Copyright

Authors of articles published by CoDAS retain copyright of their work, licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is properly cited. Authors grant CoDAS the right of first publication.

Intellectual Property and Terms of Use

All journal content and articles published by CoDAS, except where otherwise specified, are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY license. Authors of articles published by CoDAS retain copyright of their work by licensing them under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is properly cited. Authors are fully responsible for the content and information presented in their manuscripts.

CoDAS encourages Authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts by publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as by posting them on their personal social media, as long as the full citation to the journal website version is included.

Sponsors and Funding Agencies

• Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFa)

• Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) - Editorial Support Notices 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AUTHORS

Only articles submitted through the Online Publishing System, available at http://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/codas-scielo, will be accepted for review. Manuscripts may be submitted in Portuguese, English or Spanish and, when approved, will be published in Portuguese and English or Spanish and English.

Manuscripts under editorial review may not be submitted to other publications, national or international, until they are effectively published or rejected by the editorial board. Only an editor-in-chief may authorize the reproduction of articles published in the CoDAS journal in another journal.

In case of doubts, authors should contact the executive secretariat by email at codas@editoracubo.com.br.

Types of documents accepted

The CoDAS journal publishes the following types of articles: “Original articles”, “Review articles” (Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis, Scoping review and Critical review), “Brief communications”, “Case reports”, “Letters to the editor”.

Original article

Articles intended to disseminate scientific research results and must be original and unpublished. Their structure must necessarily contain the following items: resumo e descritores, abstract and keywords, introduction, method, results, discussion, conclusion, acknowledgments and references.

The abstract should contain information that encourages the reader to read the article and, therefore, should not contain numerical or statistical results. The introduction should present a brief literature review that addresses the objects of study, in addition to clearly providing the justification. The method should be described in the necessary detail and include relevant information so that the study can be reproduced. The results should be interpreted to indicate the statistical relevance of the data found, and should not be a mere presentation of tables, charts and figures. The data presented in the text should not be duplicated in the tables, charts and figures and/or vice versa. It is recommended that the data be subjected to inferential statistical analysis when relevant. The discussion should not repeat the results or the introduction, and the conclusion should respond concisely to the proposed objectives, clearly and objectively indicating the relevance of the study presented and its contribution to the advancement of Science. Acknowledgements, when relevant, should be added to include the research funding received, as well as companies/institutions that collaborated in the development of the research. At least 90% of the references cited (maximum 30) should be articles published in indexed journals of national and international literature, preferably in the last five years. Citations of theses or papers presented at scientific conferences should not be included. The file should not contain more than 30 pages, including tables, graphs and images. It is suggested that the scientific writing of this type of study follow guidelines according to the type of scientific study: CONSORT Statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) for randomized clinical trials, STROBE Statement (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) for observational studies, and STARD (Standards for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy) for diagnostic studies.

The approval number of the Research Ethics Committee, as well as the statement that all individuals involved (or their guardians) signed the Informed Consent Form, in the case of research involving people or animals (as well as surveys of medical records or documents from an institution), are mandatory and must be cited in the method section. The approval document from the Research Ethics Committee as well as the Informed Consent Form must be scanned and attached to the system, at the time of submission of the article, a document restricted to editors.

Review article

● Systematic review with or without meta-analysis or Scoping review

They are articles that answer a research question and analyze all scientific evidence regarding this research question. They result from research with a well-defined objective that seeks to analyze or map the literature. The methods must contain the research question, the search methods and strategies with the respective sources and justification for choice, the selection methodology and eligibility criteria for the studies, as well as the methodology for data extraction and synthesis. In systematic reviews, the methodology must also include an assessment of the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. The numerical results of the studies included in the systematic review can, in many circumstances, be statistically analyzed through meta-analysis. Articles with meta-analysis must strictly adhere to the standards indicated for this technique. All systematic and scoping reviews must be reported following the PRISMA or PRISMA-ScR guidelines, whose completed checklist should preferably be submitted as supplementary material. Systematic and scoping reviews must follow the structure: resumo and descritores, abstract and keywords, introduction, method, results, discussion, conclusion, and references. All papers selected for systematic review must be listed in the references. The file must not contain more than 30 pages (excluding references, tables, graphs and figures). The registration number of the systematic review protocol must be included in the method. For scoping reviews, we suggest to indicate the protocol registration number.

● Critical review

The article must be descriptive and discursive and devoted to the critical discussion of topics of scientific interest, respecting the scope of the CoDAS journal. It must present a clear formulation of a scientific object of interest, theoretical and methodological criticism of the works consulted, a conclusive synthesis, or a consensus or scope review. The article must not contain more than 30 pages (including abstracts, tables, figures, and references). Maximum number of tables and figures: 5. The number of references is unlimited. Abstracts must have up to 150 words.

The researchers of recognized expertise must prepare the critical review, invited by the Editors-in-Chief or indicated by Associate Editors.

Case report or experience report

They are articles presenting new, unusual, or innovative cases or experiences, of a single case or series of cases, with unique characteristics of interest to professional practice, describing their aspects, history, conduct, and observed results. They must contain: resumo and descritores, abstract and keywords, introduction (with a brief literature review), presentation of the clinical case or reported experience, final comments, and references (maximum 15). They must not contain more than 20 pages. The presentation of the clinical case must contain the statement that the individuals involved (or their guardians) signed the Free and Informed Consent Form, consenting to the performance and dissemination of the research and its results. When using patient images, at the time of article submission, a copy of the Free and Informed Consent Form must be attached (separately in the system), stating the approval to use the images in scientific journals. It is suggested that the scientific writing of case reports follow The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development.

Brief communication

They are short research articles aiming to present interesting preliminary results with an impact on the communication disorders, audiology, and swallowing areas, with a limit of 2,500 words (from introduction to conclusion). They follow the same format as the original articles and must contain: resumo and descritores, abstract and keywords, introduction, method, results, discussion, conclusion, and references. They must contain a maximum of two tables/charts/figures and 15 references, of which at least 80% must be articles published in national and international journals, preferably in the last five years.

Letter to the editor

They are criticisms of published articles in a constructive, objective, and educational manner, or discussions of specific current affairs. Letters will be published at the discretion of the Editors. Letters should be brief, with a limit of up to 1,200 words.

Editorial

They are thematic text under the responsibility of the editors or guest researchers (up to 2,000 words).

Authors' Contributions

Authors' contributions should be detailed on the document's title page and follow the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standard. All contributors who qualify as authors for the article should have their contribution described using this taxonomy. Contributions that do not qualify as authorship should be in the acknowledgement section.

Manuscript Preparation

The following standards must be followed for all types of papers and were based on the format proposed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and published in the article “Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical journals”, April 2010 version, available at: http://www.icmje.org/.

The text must be formatted in Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect, on ISO A4 paper (212x297mm), typed double-spaced, in Arial font size 12, 2.5cm margins on each side, justified, with pages numbered in Arabic numerals; each section must begin on a new page, in the following sequence: title of the article, in Portuguese (or Spanish) and English, resumo and descritores, abstract and keywords, text (according to the items required for the section to which the article was submitted), references, tables, charts, figures (graphs, photographs, and illustrations) cited in the text and annexes, or appendices, with their respective captions.

Please refer to the "Article Types" section of these Instructions to prepare your article according to the type and lengths indicated.

ARTICLE SUBMISSION FORMAT

Manuscript

Title, abstract and keywords

The manuscript should begin with the title of the article, in Portuguese (or Spanish) and English, followed by the abstract, in Portuguese (or Spanish) and English, of no more than 250 words. The abstract should be structured according to the type of article and should be clear and present the main parts of the work concisely, highlighting the most significant data.

Thus, for Original Articles, the structure should be, in Portuguese: objetivo, método, resultados, conclusão; in English: purpose, methods, results, conclusion. For Systematic Reviews or Meta-Analyses, the structure of the abstract should be, in Portuguese: objetivo, estratégia de pesquisa, critérios de seleção, análise dos dados, resultados, conclusão; in English: purpose, research strategies, selection criteria, data analysis, results, conclusion. For Case Reports, the abstract should not be structured. Below the abstract, specify at least five and at most ten descritores/keywords that define the subject of the work. The keywords should be based on the DeCS (Health Sciences Descriptors) published by Bireme, available at the following electronic address: http://decs.bvs.br.

Text

It must follow the structure required for each type of work. The citation of authors in the text must be numerical and sequential, using Arabic numerals in parentheses and superscript, without a date and preferably without reference to the names of the authors, as in the example:

“... Qualquer desordem da fala associada tanto a uma lesão do sistema nervoso quanto a uma disfunção dos processos sensório-motores subjacentes à fala, pode ser classificada como uma desordem motora ^(11-13) ...”

Words or expressions in English that do not have an official translation into Portuguese should be written in italics. Numbers up to ten should be written in full. The text must indicate where tables, charts, figures, and appendices should be inserted, in the same way they are numbered sequentially. All tables and charts should be in black and white; figures (graphs, photographs, and illustrations) may be in color. Tables, charts, and figures should be placed at the end of the article, after the references, and should also be presented as an appendix in the submission system, as indicated above.

All articles must present the approval number of the Research Ethics Committee in the Methods section and inform whether the participants signed the Free and Informed Consent Form, in the case of research involving people. If the article has been exempted by the research ethics committee, this must be explicit in the section, together with the justification for the exemption.

Tables

Tables should be presented separately from the text, each on a separate page, at the end of the document, and submitted as an attachment in the submission system. Tables should be typed with double spacing and in Arial 8 font, numbered sequentially in Arabic numerals, in the order in which they were cited in the text. All tables should have a short, self-explanatory title inserted above the table. All columns in the table should be identified with a header. The table footer should include a caption for abbreviations and statistical tests used.

The number of tables should be sufficient to describe the data concisely. Tables should not repeat information presented in the body of the text. The presentation format should have horizontal lines separating the header, body, and conclusion of the table. They should be opened laterally. A maximum of five tables will be accepted.

Charts

They must follow the same structure guidelines as the tables, differing only in the way they are presented, which may have a vertical outline and must be closed laterally. A maximum of two tables will be accepted. The tables should be presented separately from the text, each on a separate page, at the end of the document, and also presented as an attachment in the submission system.

Figures (graphs, photographs and illustrations)

Figures should be submitted separately from the text, at the end of the document, numbered sequentially in Arabic numerals, according to the order in which they appear in the text. All figures should also be submitted as an attachment in the submission system. All figures should have adequate graphic quality (they can be in color, black and white, or grayscale, always with a white background) and have a title in the caption, typed in Arial 8 font. To avoid problems that compromise the publication standard of the CoDAS journal, the image scanning process should comply with the following parameters: for graphs or diagrams, use 800 dpi/bitmap for linework; for illustrations and photos, use 300 dpi/RGB or grayscale.

In all cases, files must have the extension .tif and/or .jpg. Files with the extension .xls (Excel), .eps, .wmf will also be accepted for curved illustrations (graphs, drawings, diagrams). If the figures have already been published elsewhere, they must be accompanied by written authorization from the author/publisher and the source must be included in the illustration caption. A maximum of five figures will be accepted.

Legends

Present legends using double spacing, accompanying the respective tables, charts, figures (graphs, photographs and illustrations) and appendices.

Abbreviations and acronyms

They must be preceded by the full name when cited for the first time in the text. Abbreviations and acronyms used in tables, charts, figures and appendices must appear in the legend with their full name. They should not be used in the title of the article or in the abstract.

Title Page

ORCID

All authors must have an ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) registration number associated with their respective registrations in the ScholarOne system.

Author affiliation

Author affiliations must be presented in the institution's native language and include the institution's geographic location (city, province/federal unit/state, and country). When more than one author belongs to the same institution, the information must be grouped, distinguishing only in cases they are from different departments or study groups. Data on titles, positions, or biographies should not be in the affiliations.

Corresponding E-mail

The author responsible for the article must provide his/her corresponding e-mail on the title page. The information will be published with the manuscript in the correspondence address section.

Clinical Trials Registration

The CoDAS journal supports the clinical trials registration policies of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), recognizing the importance of these initiatives for the international registration and dissemination of information on clinical studies, in open access. Therefore, only clinical research articles that have received an identification number in one of the Clinical Trials Registries validated by the criteria established by the WHO and ICMJE, whose addresses are available on the ICMJE website, will be accepted for publication. This number must be presented at the end of the abstract or http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/primary/en/index.html. the identification number.

Authorship Contribution

Author contributions must be detailed on the document's title page and follow the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) standard. All contributors who qualify as authors in the article must have their contribution described using this taxonomy. Contributions that do not qualify as authorship must be in the acknowledgement section.

Conflict of interest

Detail any potential conflicts of interest of the authors to the research. If any of the authors receive funding from institutions or have institutional ties that conflict with the integrity of the research results, these should be explicitly stated in this section.

Data Availability

Authors who make raw data available for articles published in CoDAS must inform where the data is available in this section. Authors are encouraged to make these materials available in open-access repositories. If published in one of these repositories, declare the repository and URL to access the available material.

Digital Assets

Tables, charts, figures, graphs, photographs, and illustrations must be cited in the text and presented in the manuscript after the references, and also be presented as an attachment in the submission system, as indicated in the "Article Submission Format" section.

Tables and charts must be in editable format, i.e., built using table/spreadsheet editing software or created in a text editor using the table tool.

All figures must also be submitted as attachments in the submission system. All figures must have adequate graphic quality (they can be in color, black and white, or grayscale, always with a white background) and have a title in the legend, typed in Arial 8 font. To avoid problems that compromise the publication standard of the CoDAS journal, the image scanning process must comply with the following parameters: for graphs or diagrams, use 800 dpi/bitmap for line drawing; for illustrations and photos, use 300 dpi/RGB or grayscale.

In all cases, files must have the extension .tif and/or .jpg. Files with the extension .xls (Excel), .eps, .wmf will also be accepted for curved illustrations (graphs, drawings, diagrams). If the figures have already been published elsewhere, they must be accompanied by written authorization from the author/editor and the source must be included in the illustration caption. A maximum of five figures will be accepted.

Separately from the manuscript, on a separate sheet, please present the identification page, as indicated above. The manuscript must not contain authorship data; this data must be presented only on the Identification Page.

Citations and References

References and citations must be presented in the “Vancouver Style” format, as shown in the examples below. They must be numbered consecutively, in the same order in which they were cited in the text, and identified with Arabic numerals.

For all references, please cite all authors up to six. Above six, cite the first six, followed by the expression et al.

• General recommendations

  • Use references published in indexed journals in the last five years as a preference.

  • Whenever available, the titles of the articles should be used in their English version.

  • Whenever possible, include the DOI of the cited documents.

  • References to theses, dissertations, or papers presented at scientific conferences should be avoided.

Examples of references

• Journal articles

Shriberg LD, Flipsen PJ Jr, Thielke H, Kwiatkowski J, Kertoy MK, Katcher ML et al. Risk for speech disorder associated with early recurrent otitis media with effusions: two retrospective studies. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43(1):79-99.

Wertzner HF, Rosal CAR, Pagan LO. Ocorrência de otite média e infecções de vias aéreas superiores em crianças com distúrbio fonológico. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2002;7(1):32-9.

• Books

Northern J, Downs M. Hearing in children. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1983.

• Book chapters 

Rees N. An overview of pragmatics, or what is in the box? In: Irwin J. Pragmatics: the role in language development. La Verne: Fox; 1982. p. 1-13.

• Book chapters (same authorship)

Russo IC. Intervenção fonoaudiológica na terceira idade. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 1999. Distúrbios da audição: a presbiacusia; p. 51-82.

• Electronic documents

ASHA: American Speech and Hearing Association [Internet]. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; c1997-2008. Otitis media, hearing and language development. [cited 2003 Aug 29]; [about 3 screens]

Supplementary Documents

The following documents must be included:

• Letter signed by all authors, containing permission to reproduce the material and terms of responsibility of the authors when publishing in CoDAS. The document must be digitalized. In the system, type it as “Supplemental File NOT for Review” (model available in English and Portuguese);

• Approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution where the work was conducted when referring to research on human beings or animals. The document must be digitalized. In the system, type it as “Supplemental File NOT for Review”;

• Manuscript identification page. All authorship data must be on the Identification Page (click here to download the template). The manuscript must not contain authorship data. In the system, type it as “Title Page”;

• Tables, charts, figures, graphs, photographs and illustrations must be cited in the text and presented in the manuscript, after the references. They must also be presented as an attachment, in the submission system. Tables and charts must be presented in DOC or DOCX format. Figures, graphs, illustrations and photographs must be presented in at least 300 dpi, with good resolution and sharpness. In the system, type it as “Table”, “Figure” or “Image”;

• Manuscript (see below how to prepare this document). In the system, type it as “Main Document”; 

• Regarding the submission of the revised manuscript after reviewers’ suggestions, the authors must write a “Response Letter to Reviewers” to answer possible questions and justify when relevant. In the text of the revised version, highlight the specific changes in yellow throughout the text. The “Response Letter to Reviewers” must be inserted in the article submission system in the “Supplemental File for Review” item, together with the submission of the new version of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Please provide sources of support for the work, including names of sponsors, and contract number (if any), along with explanations of the role of these sources.

CONTACT

Production and editorial assistance

Editora Cubo
Rua Conde do Pinhal, 1762, Centro
CEP 13560-648, São Carlos, SP — Brasil
Telefone: +55 (16) 3509-7900
E-mail: codas@editoracubo.com.br 

Editorial and publisher decisions

Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
Al. Jaú, 684, 7º andar
CEP 01420-002, São Paulo, SP — Brasil
Telefone: +55 (11) 3873-4211
E-mail: revista@codas.org.br