CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240186en
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Exploring the nature of stuttering through a behavioral-neuro-modulation intervention program in bilinguals with stuttering

Chanchal Chaudhary; Samir Kumar Praharaj; Gopee Krishnan

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240186en CoDAS, vol.37, n1, e20240186, 2025
PDF
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 94

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose: Investigations on identifying the nature of stuttering present varying views. The argument remains whether the stuttering dysfluencies have a motor or a linguistic foundation. Though stuttering is considered a speech-motor disorder, linguistic factors are increasingly reported to play a role in stuttering. Current literature points towards deficits in speech-related motor areas of the brain to abnormalities in linguistic planning and phonological memory playing a role in stuttering. Examining cross-linguistic generalization of treatment gains from treated to untreated language in bilinguals who stutter may provide a unique opportunity to explore the motor and linguistic factors in stuttering.

Methods: In the current study, we explored this potential by experimentally controlling the language of treatment in bilinguals with stuttering (BWS). We hypothesized that if the dysfluencies in stuttering arise from the underlying motor deficits, then the language of treatment would not play a significant role in cross-linguistic generalization. Sixteen BWS were given transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) along with behavioral intervention for three weeks. The language of treatment was randomized, wherein participants in one group received behavioral intervention in their dominant language and the other in their non-dominant language.

Results: Results showed that participants in both groups showed a reduction in their stuttering dysfluencies (% stuttered syllables) regardless of the language of treatment, and the treatment gains were generalized to the non-treated language.

Conclusion: Linguistic factors such as language dominance and structure of languages did not surface to play a role in the generalization, signaling the motoric nature of dysfluencies in stuttering.

Keywords

Stuttering, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Bilingualism, Childhood-onset Fluency Disorder, Intervention

Referências

1 Watkins KE, Smith SM, Davis S, Howell P. Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 1):50-9. http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm241. PMid:17928317.

2 Connally EL, Ward D, Howell P, Watkins KE. Disrupted white matter in language and motor tracts in developmental stuttering. Brain Lang. 2014;131:25-35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.013. PMid:23819900.

3 Busan P. Developmental stuttering and the role of the supplementary motor cortex. J Fluency Disord. 2020;64:105763. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105763. PMid:32361030.

4 Budde KS, Barron DS, Fox PT. Stuttering, induced fluency, and natural fluency: a hierarchical series of activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Brain Lang. 2014;139:99-107. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.002. PMid:25463820.

5 Neumann K, Preibisch C, Euler HA, Von Gudenberg AW, Lanfermann H, Gall V, et al. Cortical plasticity associated with stuttering therapy. J Fluency Disord. 2005;30(1):23-39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.12.002. PMid:15769497.

6 Etchell AC, Civier O, Ballard KJ, Sowman PF. A systematic literature review of neuroimaging research on developmental stuttering between 1995 and 2016. J Fluency Disord. 2018;55:6-45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.03.007. PMid:28778745.

7 Belyk M, Kraft SJ, Brown S. Stuttering as a trait or a state revisited: motor system involvement in persistent developmental stuttering (vol 41, pg 275, 2015). Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45(4):622-4. http://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13512. PMid:28191730.

8 Dworzynski K, Howell P. Predicting stuttering from phonetic complexity in German. J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(2):149-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.03.001. PMid:15178130.

9 Howell P. Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord. 2004;31:123-40. http://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_31_S_123. PMid:18259590.

10 Yang Y, Jia F, Fox PT, Siok WT, Tan LH. Abnormal neural response to phonological working memory demands in persistent developmental stuttering. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(1):214-25. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24366. PMid:30145850.

11 Hakim HB, Ratner NB. Nonword repetition abilities of children who stutter: an exploratory study. J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(3):179-99. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.06.001. PMid:15458830.

12 Priyanka K, Maruthy S. Cross-linguistic generalization of fluency to untreated language in bilingual adults who stutter. Journal of Indian Speech Language & Hearing Association. 2019;33(1):23-31. http://doi.org/10.4103/jisha.JISHA_29_18.

13 Lim VP, Lincoln M, Onslow M, Chan YH. English-only treatment of bilingual speakers who stutter: Generalization of treatment effects from English to Mandarin. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(5):431-40. http://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.979874. PMid:25430634.

14 Vong E, Wilson L, Lincoln M. The Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention for Malaysian families: four case studies. J Fluency Disord. 2016;49:29-39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.07.003. PMid:27638190.

15 Ardila A, Ramos E, Barrocas R. Patterns of stuttering in a Spanish/English bilingual: a case report. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011;25(1):23-36. http://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2010.510918. PMid:20919805.

16 Lim VP, Lincoln M, Chan YH, Onslow M. Stuttering in English–Mandarin bilingual speakers: the influence of language dominance on stuttering severity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008;51(6):1522-37. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0054).

17 Schäfer M, Robb MP. Stuttering characteristics of German–English bilingual speakers. Clin Linguist Phon. 2012;26(7):597-612. http://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.689918. PMid:22690716.

18 Maruthy S, Raj N, Geetha MP, Priya CS. Disfluency characteristics of Kannada–English bilingual adults who stutter. J Commun Disord. 2015;56:19-28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.06.001. PMid:26102268.

19 Riley G, Bakker K. SSI-4: stuttering severity instrument. Austin: PRO-ED; 2009.

20 Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Meesen RL, Dechent P, Paulus W, et al. Current intensity‐and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(6):1644-66. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24901. PMid:31860160.

21 Chesters J, Möttönen R, Watkins KE. Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter. Brain. 2018;141(4):1161-71. http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy011. PMid:29394325.

22 Chesters J, Watkins KE, Möttönen R. Investigating the feasibility of using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance fluency in people who stutter. Brain Lang. 2017;164:68-76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.003. PMid:27810647.

23 Maruthy S, Venugopal S, Parakh P. Speech rhythm in Kannada speaking adults who stutter. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(5):529-37. http://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2016.1221459. PMid:27576027.

24 Ononiwu CA. The impact of syllable structure complexity on stuttering frequency for bilinguals and multilinguals who stutter [dissertation]. Athens, GA: University of Georgia; 2010.

25 Krishnamurti B. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

26 Makarova EA, Polyakov VN. The origin of the article in Indo-European Languages of Western Europe. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2015;6:61. http://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s4p61.

27 Grolman MB, Biktagirova ZA, Kasimov OH. Phonetic peculiarities of the English language in India. Int J Soc Cult Lang. 2021;9(1):102-10.

28 Blomgren M, Roy N, Callister T, Merrill RM. Intensive stuttering modification therapy: a Multidimensional. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48(3):509-23. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/035).

29 Chesters J, Möttönen R, Watkins KE. Neural changes after training with transcranial direct current stimulation to increase speech fluency in adults who stutter. OSF Preprints. 2021:1-26. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8st3j.

30 Busan P, Moret B, Masina F, Del Ben G, Campana G. Speech fluency improvement in developmental stuttering using non-invasive brain stimulation: insights from available evidence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:662016. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.662016. PMid:34456692.

31 Brown S, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Laird AR, Fox PT. Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):105-17. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20140. PMid:15846815.

32 Chang SE. Using brain imaging to unravel the mysteries of stuttering. Cerebrum. 2011:12. PMid:23447781.

33 Chang SE, Zhu DC, Choo AL, Angstadt M. White matter neuroanatomical differences in young children who stutter. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 3):694-711. http://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu400. PMid:25619509.

34 Neef NE, Anwander A, Friederici AD. The neurobiological grounding of persistent stuttering: from structure to function. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15(9):63. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-015-0579-4. PMid:26228377.

35 Acharya JN, Acharya VJ. Overview of EEG montages and principles of localization. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;36(5):325-9. http://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000538. PMid:31490449.

36 Buchwald A, Khosa N, Rimikis S, Duncan ES. Behavioral and neurological effects of tDCS on speech motor recovery: A single-subject intervention study. Brain Lang. 2020;210:104849. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104849. PMid:32905863.

37 Kronberg G, Rahman A, Sharma M, Bikson M, Parra LC. Direct current stimulation boosts hebbian plasticity in vitro. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(2):287-301. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.014. PMid:31668982.

38 Chan MM, Han YM. The functional brain networks activated by music listening: a neuroimaging meta-analysis and implications for treatment. Neuropsychology. 2022;36(1):4-22. http://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000777. PMid:34636582.
 

Submetido em:
19/06/2024

Aceito em:
23/07/2024

67be3bd7a953950b2844ec74 codas Articles
2317-1782 (Eletrônico)
CoDAS ©2025 Todos os direitos reservados.

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections