CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240106en
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills-Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP): a diagnostic accuracy study

Simone Nicolini de Simoni; Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes; Karina Carlesso Pagliarin; Márcia Keske-Soares

Downloads: 1
Views: 96

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose: To present the criterion validity, sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off scores for the Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills Test - Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP) - Expanded List.

Methods: This was a quantitative cross-sectional psychometric study. The sample consisted of 30 children with no identified neurodevelopmental disorders aged 24 to 36 months. Twenty-three were part of the control group, and seven were part of the clinical group, which consisted of children with reported delays in vocabulary acquisition and phonological development. Children were administered the PEEPS-BP - Expanded List and responses to each item/stimulus were analyzed based on the following categories: spontaneous naming, repetition, and not naming the item at all. Criterion validity was established using Student’s T-test to compare the scores obtained by clinical and control group participants on the instrument. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: Scores of the clinical and control groups differed significantly at p ≤ 0.001. A cut-off point of 34 had a sensitivity of 0.957 and specificity of 100.00 in distinguishing between the two participant groups.

Conclusion: The PEEPS-BP had adequate criterion validity and cut-off points that could distinguish between the clinical and control group with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

Children, Speech, Language, Vocabulary, Validity

Referências

1 Core C, Hoff E, Rumiche R, Señor M. Total and conceptual vocabulary in Spanish-English bilinguals from 22 to 30 months: implications for assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(5):1637-49. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/11-0044). PMid:24023382.

2 Peter MS, Durrant S, Jessop A, Bidgood A, Pine JM, Rowland CF. Does speed of processing or vocabulary size predict later language growth in toddlers? Cognit Psychol. 2019;115(1):101238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101238. PMid:31539813.

3 Ceron MI, Simoni SN, Keske-Soares M. Phonological acquisition in Brazilian Portuguese: ages of customary production, acquisition and mastery. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022;57(2):274-87. http://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12689. PMid:34957652.

4 Ribas LP, Faleiro A, Bernardi ACS, Lemmertz MLC. Phonological acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese: a systematic review about the consonantal development. Distúrb Comun. 2022;34(1):1-13. http://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2022v34i1e53900.

5 Ferrante C, Van Borsel J, Pereira MMB. Aquisição fonológica de crianças de classe sócio econômica alta. Rev CEFAC. 2008;10(4):452-60. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462008000400005.

6 Marklund U, Lacerda F, Persson A, Lohmander A. The development of a vocabulary for PEEPS-SE: profiles of early expressive phonological skills for Swedish. Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(9):844-59. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1445780. PMid:29634359.

7 Stoel-Gammon C, Williams AL. Early phonological development: creating an assessment test. Clin Linguist Phon. 2013;27(4):278-86. http://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.766764. PMid:23489340.

8 Oliveira DND. O uso do teste PEEPS (Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills) adaptado para o português brasileiro na avaliação precoce do desenvolvimento fonológico de crianças com fissura labiopalatina comparativamente a crianças sem fissura [tese]. Bauru: Universidade de São Paulo; 2021.

9 Simoni SN, Morares DADO, Pagliarin KC, Keske-Soares M. Validade de conteúdo do Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills-Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP) -Lista Expandida. CoDAS. 2024;36(1):1-9. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022083pt.

10 Teixeira ERA. Adaptação dos Inventários MacArthur de Desenvolvimento Comunicativo (CDI’s) para o português brasileiro. In: II Congresso Nacional da ABRALIN; 2000; Florianópolis. Anais. Florianópolis: Associação Brasileira de Linguística; 2000. p. 479-87.

11 Bayley N. Bayley scales of infants development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1993.

12 Scherer NS, Yamashita R, Fukushiro AP, Keske-Soares M, Oliveira DN, Ingram D, et al. Assessment of early phonological development in children with clefts in Brazilian Portuguese. In: Babatsouli E, editor. Under-reported monolingual child phonology. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2020: Chapter 17; p. 400-21.

13 IBM Corporation. Released 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2011.

14 Andrade CRF, Befi-Lopes DM, Fernandes FDM, Wetzner WH. ABFW: teste de linguagem infantil nas áreas de Fonologia, Vocabulário, Fluência e Pragmática. Carapicuíba: Pró-Fono; 2004. 90 p.

15 Yavas H, Hernandorena CLM, Lamprecht RR. Avaliação fonológica da criança. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 2002.

16 Goulart BNG, Chiari BM, Almeida CPB. Factors associated with speech, hearing and language disorders among children in a primary care outpatient center. J Hum Growth Dev. 2017;27(3):281-7. http://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.124092.

17 Hage SRDV, Pereira MB. Desempenho de crianças com desenvolvimento típico de linguagem em prova de vocabulário expressivo. Rev CEFAC. 2006;8(4):419-28. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462006000400003.

18 Brancalioni AR, Zauza A, Karlinski CD, Quitaiski LF, Thomaz MFO. Expressive vocabulary performance of students aged from 4 to 5 years attending public and private schools. Audiol Commun Res. 2018;23:e1836. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1836.

19 Darcy I, Daidone D, Kojima C. Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners. Ment Lex. 2013;8(3):372-420. http://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.06dar.

20 Moretti TCDF, Kuroishi RCS, Mandrá PP. Vocabulary of preschool children with typical language development and socioeducational variables. CoDAS. 2017;29(1):e20160098. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172016098. PMid:28300961.

21 Daidone D, Darcy I. Vocabulary size is a key factor in predicting second language lexical encoding accuracy. Front Psychol. 2021;12:688356. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688356. PMid:34367013.

22 Uberti LB, Keske-Soares M, Pagliarin KC. Semantic analysis of words for the Virtual Tool for Speech Assessment. Rev CEFAC. 2023;25(5):1-9. http://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232556523.
 


Submetido em:
04/04/2024

Aceito em:
21/10/2024

67be3912a953950a5c433e25 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections