CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240103en
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Self-perception of stuttering: association with self-perception of hearing, fluency profile, and contextual aspects

Camila Eduarda Elias Silva; Denise Brandão de Oliveira Britto; Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos

Downloads: 0
Views: 94

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose: This study investigated the association between self-perception of stuttering and self-perception of hearing, speech fluency profile, and contextual aspects in Brazilian adults who stutter.

Methods: Fifty-five adults who stutter (ages 18 to 58 years), speakers of Brazilian Portuguese speakers, participated in an observational study that included: (a) a clinical history survey to collect identification, sociodemographic, clinical, and assistance data; (b) the Brazil Economic Classification Criteria (CCEB); (c) a hearing self-perception questionnaire (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale – SSQ, version 5.6); (d) self-perception of the impact of stuttering (Brazilian Portuguese version of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering – Adults – OASES-A); and (e) an assessment of speech fluency (Fluency Profile Assessment Protocol -- PAPF). Data analysis consisted of descriptive and bivariate analysis using Pearson’s chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results: Most participants were classified as moderate to severe in the total classification of the impact of stuttering. There were moderate and weak negative correlations between the participants' self-perception of stuttering and self-perception of hearing.

Conclusion: Self-perception of auditory abilities was greater to the extent that self-perception of the impacts of stuttering on quality of life was lower.

Keywords

Stuttering, Adult, Quality of Life, Fluency, Auditory Skills

Referências

1 Boyle MP. Relationships between psychosocial factors and quality of life for adults who stutter. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(1):1-12. http://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-14-0089. PMid:25410098.

2 Andrade CRF, Sassi FC, Juste FS, Ercolin B. Qualidade de vida em indivíduos com gagueira desenvolvimental persistente. Pro Fono. 2008;20(4):219-24. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872008000400003.

3 Yaruss JS. Assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research. J Fluency Disord. 2010;35(3):190-202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.010. PMid:20831967.

4 Guitar B. Stuttering: an integrated approach to its nature and management. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006

5 Etchell AC, Civier O, Ballard KJ, Sowman PF. A systematic literature review of neuroimaging research on developmental stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 2018;55:6-45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.03.007. PMid:28778745.

6 Moein N, Rostami R, Mohamadi R, Zomorrodi R, Nitsche M, Ostadi A, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of stuttering severity: an ERP study. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;101:80-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2022.03.021. PMid:35561434.

7 Hampton A, Weber-Fox C. Non-linguistic auditory processing in stuttering: evidence from behavior and event-related brain potentials. J Fluency Disord. 2008;33(4):253-73. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.08.001. PMid:19328979.

8 Bosshardt HG. Cognitive processing load as a determinant of stuttering: summary of a research programme. Clin Linguist Phon. 2006;20(5):371-85. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500074321. PMid:16728334.

9 APA: American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington: American Psychiatric Pub.; 2013

10 Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS. Stuttering as defined by adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(12):4356-69. http://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00137. PMid:31830837.

11 Di Nubila HB, Buchalla CM. O papel das Classificações da OMS - CID e CIF nas definições de deficiência e incapacidade. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2008;11(2):324-35. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000200014.

12 Tichenor SE, Herring C, Yaruss JS. Understanding the speaker’s experience of stuttering can improve stuttering therapy. Top Lang Disord. 2022;42(1):57-75. http://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000272. PMid:35757374.

13 Thomé CR, Oliveira IR, Rosa MS, Besse LV, Reis DML, Bonavides D, et al. A correlação entre índice de avaliação global da gagueira OASES-A e os índices de ansiedade, de esquiva e desconforto social. Braz J Dev. 2019;5(10):18770-83. http://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv5n10-121.

14 Siew CS, Pelczarski KM, Yaruss JS, Vitevitch MS. Using the OASES-A to illustrate how network analysis can be applied to understand the experience of stuttering. J Commun Disord. 2017;65:1-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.11.001. PMid:27907811.

15 Bragatto E, Osborn E, Yaruss J, Quesal R, Schiefer A, Chiari B. Versão brasileira do protocolo Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering – Adults (OASES-A). J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24:145-51. http://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-64912012000200010. PMid:22832682.

16 Mallipeddi NV, Aulov S, Perez HR. Associations between stuttering avoidance and perceived patient-centeredness of health care interactions. J Fluency Disord. 2022;73:105918. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2022.105918. PMid:35797776.

17 Tichenor SE, Yaruss JS. Recovery and relapse: perspectives from adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(7):2162-76. http://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00010. PMid:32598208.

18 Nang C, Hersh D, Milton K, Lau SR. The impact of stuttering on development of self-identity, relationships, and quality of life in women who stutter. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):1244-58. http://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0201. PMid:30347067.

19 Beilby J. Psychosocial impact of living with a stuttering disorder: knowing is not enough. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(2):132-43. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1371756. PMid:24782275.

20 Constantino CD, Leslie P, Quesal RW, Yaruss JS. A preliminary investigation of daily variability of stuttering in adults. J Clin Commun Disord. 2016;60:39-50. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.02.001. PMid:26945438.

21 Andrade CRF. Perfil da fluência da fala: parâmetro comparativo diferenciado por idade para crianças, adolescentes, adultos e idosos. Barueri: Pró-Fono; 2006.

22 Lopes AC, Nielsen CB, Ferrari DV, Campos PD, Ramos SM. Diretrizes de boas práticas em telefonoaudiologia [Internet]. Brasília: CFFa; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 9]. Available from: https://www.fonoaudiologia.org.br/cffa

23 Gonsalez E, Almeida K. Adaptação cultural do questionário Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) para o Português Brasileiro. Audiol Commun Res. 2015;20(3):215-24. http://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312015000300001572.

24 Andrade CRF. Adolescentes e adultos com gagueira. São Paulo: BookToy; 2017

25 IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Classificação nacional de posição na ocupação [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro; 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 9]. Available from: https://concla.ibge.gov.br/images/pdf/concla/posocupacoes.pdf

26 ABEP: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de classificação econômica Brasil [Internet]. São Paulo; 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 9]. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil

27 Siqueira AL, Tibúrcio JD. Estatística na área da saúde: conceitos, metodologia, aplicações e prática computacional. Belo Horizonte: Coopmed; 2011.

28 Perkins W, Kent R, Curlee R. A theory of neuropsycholinguistic function in stuttering. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(4):734-52. http://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3404.734. PMid:1956181.

29 Arcuri CF, Schiefer AM, Azevedo MF. Research about suppression effect and auditory processing in individuals who stutter. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20160230. PMid:28538833.

30 Prestes R, Andrade AND, Santos RBF, Marangoni AT, Schiefer AM, Gil D. Temporal processing and long-latency auditory evoked potential in stutterers. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2017;83(2):142-6. PMid:27233690.
 


Submetido em:
02/04/2024

Aceito em:
24/07/2024

67be3778a9539509bb104e53 codas Articles
Links & Downloads

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections