Software para avaliação e monitoramento do desenvolvimento da decodificação em escolares do Ensino Fundamental I: validade baseada nos processos de resposta
Software for assessment and monitoring the decoding skills development of children from the elementary school: validity based on response process
Aparecido José Couto Soares; Débora Maria Befi-Lopes
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose To continue the validation process of the Decoding Development Monitoring Protocol (PRADE) in software format in the validity evidence stage based on response processes.
Methods 250 individuals participated in this study, 125 individuals from private schools and 125 individuals from public schools. The assessment was carried out in person using the software that hosts the instrument's tasks, which are organized into decoding linguistically balanced words and non-words, respecting the decoding rules of Brazilian Portuguese. The software prepares an individual performance report for each participant, counting the decoding time for each stimulus, as well as the number of words decoded correctly. The data is organized considering the correct decoding time of the stimuli, decoding accuracy and percentage of correct answers. All data underwent statistical analysis using SPSS software.
Results The data indicated an important effect of the length of words and non-words on public and private school students. Furthermore, it was possible to observe the evolution of decoding, depending on the school year, in all the variables studied. In both groups, a strong influence of non-words on student performance throughout Elementary School I was observed.
Conclusion The data indicate validity in the analysis of response processes, since it was possible to adequately characterize the performance of school children public and private throughout Elementary School I, characterizing each group, as well as their differences according to the advancement of schooling.
Keywords
References
1 Nese JFT, Biancarosa G, Cummings K, Kennedy P, Alonzo J, Tindal G. In search of average growth: describing within-year oral reading fluency growth across Grades 1-8. J Sch Psychol. 2013;51(5):625-42.
2 Carter MD, Walker MM, O’Brien K. The effects of rate on single-word reading assessment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(1):13-23.
3 Damasceno ESS, Sacaloski M, Costa MO, Kida ASB, de Avila CRB. Programa de estimulação no ambiente educacional para aprimoramento de habilidades subjacentes à leitura. Audiol Commun Res. 2022;27:e2549.
4 Cogo-Moreira H, Molinari GL, de Carvalho CAF, Kida ASB, Lúcio PS, de Avila CRB. Pontos de corte, sensibilidade e especificidade para rastreamento da fluência leitora em crianças. CoDAS. 2023;35(3):e20210263.
5 Alves LM, dos Santos LF, Miranda ICC, Carvalho IM, Ribeiro GL, Freire LSC, et al. Evolução da velocidade de leitura no Ensino Fundamental I e II. CoDAS. 2021;33(5):e20200168.
6 Gentilini LKS, Andrade MEP, Basso FP, de Salles JF, Martins-Reis VO, Alves LM. Desenvolvimento de instrumento para avaliação coletiva da fluência e compreensão de leitura textual em escolares do ensino fundamental II. CoDAS. 2020;32(2):e20190015.
7 Cunha VLO, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares de 1a a 4a série do ensino fundamental nas provas de habilidades metafonológicas e de leitura - PROHMELE. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2009;14(1):56-68.
8 Oliveira AM, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares na adaptação brasileira da avaliação dos processos de leitura. Pro Fono. 2010;22(4):555-60.
9 Oliveira AM, Capellini SA. Compreensão leitora de palavras e frases: elaboração de words and sentences reading comprehension : elaboration of evaluation procedure. Psicol Estud. 2013;18(2):293-301.
10 Chaves-Sousa S, Santos S, Viana FL, Vale AP, Cadime I, Prieto G, et al. Development of a word reading test: identifying students at-risk for reading problems. Learn Individ Differ. 2017;56:159-66.
11 Instituto ABCD. EduEdu Proposta Educacional. São Paulo: Instituto ABCD; 2023
12 Brasil. Nota sobre o Brasil no PISA. Brasília: Ministério da Educação; 2023.
13 Stern JMB, Dubeck MM, Dick A. Using Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) data for targeted instructional support: learning profiles and instructional needs in Indonesia. Int J Educ Dev. 2018;61:64-71.
14 Kainz K. Early academic gaps and Title I programming in high poverty, high minority schools. Early Child Res Q. 2019;47:159-68.
15 Venancio SI, Bortoli MC, Frias PG, Giugliani ER, Alves CR, Santos MO. Development and validation of an instrument for monitoring child development indicators. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020;96(6):778-89.
16 Alcantara HF, Azevedo AIL, Messias BLC, de Medeiros ACD, Barbosa ALA, Azoni CAS. Desempenho em vocabulário receptivo e variáveis sociodemográficas em escolares com queixa de dificuldades de aprendizagem. Audiol Commun Res. 2021;26:e2523.
17 Soares AJC, Sassi FC, Fortunato-Tavares T, Andrade CRF, Befi-Lopes DM. How word/non-word length influence reading acquisition in a transparent language: implications for children’s literacy and development. Children (Basel). 2023;10(1):49.
18 Soares AJC, Santos GHC, Befi-Lopes DM. Desempenho em decodificação e escrita de crianças com Transtorno do Desenvolvimento da Linguagem: dados preliminares. CoDAS. 2024;36(1):e20220318.
19 Fortunato-Tavares T, Befi-Lopes D, Orazem J, Soares AJC. Word-level reading skills of Brazilian children with developmental language disorder. Lang Acquis. 2023;1-20.
20 AERA: American Educational Research Association. APA: American Psychological Association. NCME: National Council on Measurement in Education.
21 Pernambuco L, Espelt A, Magalhães HV Jr, Lima KC. Recomendações para elaboração, tradução, adaptação transcultural e processo de validação de testes em Fonoaudiologia. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20160217.
22 Scliar-Cabral L. Princípios do sistema alfabético do Português do Brasil. São Paulo: Contexto; 2003. 250 p.
23 Viaro ME, Guimarães-Filho ZO. Análise quantitativa da freqüência dos fonemas e estruturas silábicas portuguesas. Estud Linguísticos. 2007;36(1):27-3.
24 Reschly AL, Busch TW, Betts J, Deno SL, Long JD. Curriculum-Based Measurement Oral Reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. J Sch Psychol. 2009;47(6):427-69.
25 APA: American Psychiatric Association. Referência rápida aos critérios diagnósticos do DSM-5-TR. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2023.
26 Soares AJC, Cárnio MS, Wertzner HF. A relevancia da medida de silabas por minuto na avaliacao da velocidade de leitura. CoDAS. 2017;29(2):e20160080.
27 Brasil. Compromisso Nacional Criança Alfabetizada. Brasília: Ministério da Educação; 2023.
28 Kilgus SP, Methe SA, Maggin DM, Tomasula JL. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): a diagnostic test accuracy metaanalysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening. J Sch Psychol. 2014;52(4):377-405.
Submitted date:
01/08/2024
Accepted date:
03/07/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email