CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023048pt
CoDAS
Original Article

Processamento auditivo central e questionário de autopercepção pós-treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado em indivíduos com traumatismo cranioencefálico leve

Central auditory processing and selfperception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury

Ana Karina Lima Buriti; Cyntia Barbosa Laureano Luiz; Laís Rocha de Barros Oliveira; Italo Capraro Suriano; Daniela Gil

Downloads: 0
Views: 71

Resumo

RESUMO: Objetivo: Correlacionar os resultados da avaliação comportamental do processamento auditivo central e do questionário de autopercepção após o treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado.

Método: Foram avaliados dez indivíduos com média de idade de 44,5 anos, que sofreram traumatismo cranioencefálico de grau leve. Os indivíduos foram submetidos a avaliação comportamental do processamento auditivo central e também responderam ao questionário de autopercepção “Treinamento Auditivo Formal” após a intervenção terapêutica. O questionário foi composto por questões referentes a percepção auditiva, compreensão de ordens, solicitação de repetição de enunciados, ocorrência mal-entendidos, tempo de atenção, desempenho auditivo em ambiente ruidoso, comunicação ao telefone e autoestima e os pacientes foram solicitados a assinalar a frequência de ocorrência dos comportamentos listados.

Resultados: As habilidades auditivas de figura-fundo e memória para sons em sequência e processamento temporal correlacionaram-se com melhora para seguir instruções, diminuição das solicitações de repetições e aumento do tempo de atenção e melhora da comunicação e da compreensão ao telefone e para assistir TV.

Conclusão: Observou-se adequação das habilidades auditivas de fechamento auditivo, figura fundo, e processamento temporal na avaliação pós-treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado, além de redução das queixas quanto ao comportamento auditivo.

Palavras-chave

Audição, Percepção de Fala, Percepção Auditiva, Cognição, Lesão Cerebral, Qualidade de Vida

Abstract

Purpose: To correlate behavioral assessment results of central auditory processing and the self-perception questionnaire after acoustically controlled auditory training.

Methods: The study assessed 10 individuals with a mean age of 44.5 years who had suffered mild traumatic brain injury. They underwent behavioral assessment of central auditory processing and answered the Formal Auditory Training self-perception questionnaire after the therapeutic intervention – whose questions address auditory perception, understanding orders, request to repeat statements, occurrence of misunderstandings, attention span, auditory performance in noisy environments, telephone communication, and self-esteem. Patients were asked to indicate the frequency with which the listed behaviors occurred.

Results: Figure-ground, sequential memory for sounds, and temporal processing correlated with improvement in following instructions, fewer requests to repeat statements, increased attention span, improved communication, and understanding on the phone and when watching TV.

Conclusion: Auditory closure, figure-ground, and temporal processing had improved in the assessment after the acoustically controlled auditory training, and there were fewer auditory behavior complaints.

Keywords

Hearing; Speech Perception; Auditory Perception; Cognition; Brain Injury; Quality of Life

References

1 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34(1-4):45-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01405862. PMid:961490.

2 Werff KRV. The application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health to functional auditory consequences of mild traumatic brain injury. Semin Hear. 2016;37(3):216-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584409. PMid:27489400.

3 Musiek FE, Chermak G. Testing and treating (c)APD in head injury patients. Hear J. 2008;61(6):36-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000324322.06758.14.

4 AAA: American Academy of Audiology. Clinical practice guidelines: diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. Reston: AAA; 2010. p. 3-51.

5 CISG: The Canadian Interorganizational Steering Group for Speech Language Pathology and Audiology. Canadian guidelines on auditory processing disorders in children and adults: assessment and intervention. Quebéc: OOAQ; 2019.

6 Cibian AP, Pereira LD. Utilização de questionário no monitoramento dos resultados do treinamento Auditivo. Distúrb Comun. 2015;27(3):466-78.

7 Volpatto FL, Rechia IC, Lessa AH, Soldera CL, Ferreira MI, Machado MS. Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed). 2018 PMid:29970341.

8 Musiek FE. The DIID: a new treatment for APD. Hear J. 2004;57(7):50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000293049.80297.cd.

9 Dias KZ, Gil D. Treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado nos distúrbios do processamento auditivo. In: Boechat EM, Menezes PL, Couto CM, Frizzo ACF, Scharlach RC, Anastasio ART. Tratado de audiologia 2. ed. São Paulo: Santos Editora; 2015. p. 534-40

10 Musiek F, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders. Semin Hear. 1998;19(4):354-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983.

11 Pereira LD. Avaliação do processamento auditivo central. In: Lopes O Fo. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 1997. p. 109-26.

12 Pereira LD. Sistema auditivo e desenvolvimento das habilidades auditivas. In: Ferreira LP, Béfi-Lopes D, Limongi SCO. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2004. p. 547-52.

13 Ling JM, Klimaj S, Toulouse T, Mayer AR. A prospective study of gray matter abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2013;81(10):2121-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000437302.36064.b1. PMid:24259552.

14 Musiek FE, Baran JA, Shinn J. Assessment and remediation of an auditory processing disorder associated with head trauma. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15(2):117-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15.2.3. PMid:15112839.

15 Marangoni AT, Gil D. Avaliação comportamental do processamento auditivo pré e pós treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos após traumatismo cranioencefálico. Audiol Commun Res. 2014;19(1):33-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312014000100007.

16 Godoy CCF, Andrade AN, Suriano I, Matas CG, Gil D. Central auditory processing in children after traumatic brain injury. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2022;77:100118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100118. PMID: 36202032.

17 Buriti AKL, Gil D. Mild traumatic brain injury: long-term follow-up of central auditory processing after auditory training. J Audiol Otol. 2022;26(1):22-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2021.00360. PMid:34922419.

18 Dundon NM, Dockree SP, Buckley V, Merriman N, Carton M, Clarke S, et al. Impaired auditory selective attention ameliorated by cognitive training with graded exposure to noise in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2015;75:74-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.012. PMid:26004059.

19 Hoover EC, Souza PE, Gallun FJ. Auditory and cognitive factors associated with speech-in-noise complaints following mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017;28(4):325-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16051. PMid:28418327.

20 Werff KRV, Rieger B. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Ear Hear. 2017;38(4):e200-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000411. PMid:28319479.

21 Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P. Auditory difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal Hearin. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):343-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275. PMid:26237266.

22 Turgeon C, Champoux F, Lepore F, Leclerc S, Ellemberg D. Auditory processing after sport-related concussions. Ear Hear. 2011;32(5):667-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821209d6. PMid:21399499.

23 Kraus N, Krizman J. An auditory perspective on concussion. Audiology Today. 2018;30(3):14-21.

24 Sobreira ACO, Gil D. Scale of Auditory Behaviors in the monitoring of acoustically controled auditory training. Rev CEFAC. 2021;23(1):e2720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20212312720.

25 Marangoni AT, Suriano IC, Buriti AKL, Gil D. Formal Auditory Training with Individuals after Traumatic Brain Injury. Health (Irvine Calif). 2017;9(6):975-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2017.96070.

26 Castan ATM, Luiz CBL, Gil D. Acoustically controlled auditory training in an adult after traumatic brain injury. Rev CEFAC. 2017;19(1):126-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201719110916.

27 Bellis TJ. Assessment and management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the educational setting: from science to practice. 2nd ed. New York: Delmar Learning Thompson Learning; 2003.

28 Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Barber J, Brett BL, Okonkwo DO, McCrea MA, et al. Functional recovery, symptoms, and quality of life 1 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e233660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3660. PMid:36939699.

29 Wallace J, Karr JE, Yengo-Kahn A, Loftin M, Anand M, Hibbler T, et al. Group differences in postconcussion cognitive, physical, sleep-arousal, and affective symptom subscales in high school and collegiate athletes by race, gender, and competitive level. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2023;38(2):E136-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000786. PMid:36883899.

30 Mulyadi M, Harianto S, Tonapa SI, Lee BO. Early quality-of-life changes in mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. J Trauma Nurs. 2023;30(2):75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000706. PMid:36881698.
 


Submitted date:
03/17/2023

Accepted date:
07/31/2023

66578e72a953956b0c7a3153 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections