CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023002pt
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Autopercepção do Impacto Imediato na Voz de Cantores Gospel após uma Apresentação de uma hora

Self-perception of the Immediate Impact on the Voice of Gospel Singers after a one-hour Presentation

Marluce dos Santos Maia Rodrigues; Fabiana Copelli Zambon; Claudia de Oliveira Lima Camargo Pacheco; Mara Suzana Behlau

Downloads: 0
Views: 67

Resumo

RESUMO: Objetivo: Investigar o impacto imediato na voz de cantores gospel com e sem queixa vocal após uma apresentação individual de uma hora.

Método: Aplicação de um questionário online que abordou os seguintes aspectos: 1 - Dados sociodemográficos; 2 – Autoavaliação da habilidade de cantar pelo protocolo Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE-BR); 3 - Autoavaliação de sintomas de fadiga vocal pelo Índice de Fadiga Vocal (IFV); e 4 - Autoavaliação da desvantagem vocal pelo protocolo Índice de Desvantagem Vocal 10 (IDV-10). Os participantes foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo Com Queixa (CQ) e Grupo Sem Queixa (SQ) com base no escore total do IDV-10. Os dados passaram por análise estatística descritiva e inferencial considerando o nível de significância de 5%.

Resultados: Participaram 43 cantores gospel com idade mediana de 34 anos, divididos entre 32 do grupo SQ e 11 do grupo CQ. O grupo CQ autorrelatou rouquidão e maior dificuldade ao cantar no EASE e maiores escores nos protocolos IDV-10 e IFV. Foi evidenciada correlação positiva entre a dificuldade ao cantar e a desvantagem vocal com a fadiga de cantores amadores gospel, sendo que essa correlação foi maior para o grupo SQ.

Conclusão: Cantores com queixa vocal apresentaram maiores índices de fadiga vocal, desvantagem vocal e maior dificuldade para cantar após uma hora de apresentação. Cantores sem queixa podem ter a habilidade de cantar prejudicada pela fadiga vocal. Variações na habilidade ao cantar e desvantagens vocais de cantores amadores gospel podem ter relação direta com a fadiga vocal.

Palavras-chave

Voz, Protocolos, Fonoaudiologia, Canto, Distúrbios da Voz

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the immediate impact on the voice of gospel singers with and without vocal complaints after a one-hour individual presentation.

Methods: Application of an online questionnaire that addressed the following aspects: 1 - Sociodemographic data; 2 – Self-assessment of the ability to sing using the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE-BR) protocol; 3 - Self-assessment of vocal fatigue symptoms using the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) protocol; and 4 - Self-assessment of voice handicap using the Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10) protocol. Participants were divided into two groups: Group with Vocal Complaint (WVC) and Group with no Vocal Complaint (WnVC) based on the total score of the IDV-10. Data underwent descriptive and inferential statistical analysis with a significance level of 5%.

Results: The study included 43 gospel singers with a median age of 34 years: 32 were in the WnVC group and 11 were in the WVC group. The WVC group reported hoarseness and experienced more difficulty while singing in the EASE, resulting in higher scores in both the VHI-10 and VFI protocols. A positive correlation was observed between singing difficulty and vocal handicap due to fatigue in amateur gospel singers, with this correlation being stronger within the WnVC group.

Conclusion: After one hour of performance, singers with vocal complaints exhibited higher rates of vocal fatigue, vocal disadvantage, and greater difficulty in singing. Singers without complaints may have their ability to sing impaired by vocal fatigue. Variations in singing ability and vocal handicaps in amateur gospel singers may be directly related to vocal fatigue

Keywords

Voice; Clinical Protocols; Speech Language and Hearing Sciences; Singing; Voice Disorders

Referências

1 LoVetri J. Training in the independent studio. J Sing. 2013;70(1):79-86.

2 Neto L, Meyer D. A Joyful Noise: the vocal health of worship leaders and contemporary christian singers. J Voice. 2017;31(2):250.e17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.012. PMid:27539003.

3 Lopes TVR, Ghirardi ACAM. Qualidade de vida em voz e sintomas vocais de cantores solistas amadores da Igreja Batista Palavra Viva de Florianópolis TT - Quality of life related to the voice and vocal symptoms of solo amateur singers of Igreja Batista Palavra Viva of Florianópolis. Distúrb Comun. 2017;29(1):33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2017v29i1p33-40.

4 dos Rios Gonçalves DM, Odagima RKY, Vaiano TCG, Amin E, Behlau M. Immediate effect of phonation into silicone tube on gospel singers. CoDAS. 2019;31(6):e20180117. PMid:31800878.

5 Zambon F, Moreti F, Ribeiro VV, Nanjundeswaran C, Behlau M. Vocal fatigue index: validation and cut-off values of the Brazilian Version. J Voice. 2022;36(3):434.e17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.018. PMid:32693976.

6 Sales CS, da Silva SP, de Medeiros AM. Desvantagem vocal em cantores populares TT - Voice disadvantage in popular singers. Audiol Commun Res. 2019;24:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-2057.

7 Solomon NP. Vocal fatigue and its relation to vocal hyperfunction. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;10(4):254-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14417040701730990. PMid:20840041.

8 Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M, et al. Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment. CoDAS. 2022;34(5):1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021240pt.

9 Camargo MRMC, Zambon F, Moreti F, Behlau M. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Adapted Borg CR10 for Vocal Effort Ratings. CoDAS. 2019;31(5):1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018112. PMid:31691744.

10 Phyland DJ, Pallant JF, Benninger MS, Thibeault SL, Greenwood KM, Smith JA, et al. Development and preliminary validation of the EASE: a tool to measure perceived singing voice function. J Voice. 2013;27(4):454-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.019. PMid:23583205.

11 Costa T, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Validation of the Voice Handicap Index: 10 (VHI-10) to the Brazilian Portuguese. CoDAS. 2013;25(5):482-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000500013. PMid:24408554.

12 Treinkman M, Johns MM 3rd. Does vocal fatigue negatively affect low vocal range in professional, female opera singers? A survey study and single-subject pilot study. J Voice. 2022. ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.005. PMid:35045947.

13 Siqueira LTD, dos Santos AP, da Silva Vitor J, Moreira PAM, Silva RLF, Fernandes G, et al. Vocal self-perception of singers during COVID-19 pandemic. J Voice. 2021. ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.032. PMid:34366192.

14 Rocha BR, Moreti F, Amin E, Madazio G, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the protocol evaluation of the ability to sing easily. CoDAS. 2014;26(6):535-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20142014175. PMid:25590918.

15 Nanjundeswaran C, Jacobson BH, Gartner-Schmidt J, Verdolini Abbott K. Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): development and validation. J Voice. 2015;29(4):433-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.012. PMid:25795356.

16 Zambon F, Moreti F, Nanjundeswaran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Vocal Fatigue Index - VFI. CoDAS. 2017;29(2):e20150261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172015261. PMid:28300936.

17 Behlau M, Alves Dos Santos LDM, Oliveira G. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index into Brazilian Portuguese. J Voice. 2011;25(3):354-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.007. PMid:20434874.

18 MUKAKA M. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69-71. PMid:23638278.

19 Costa PJBM, Ferreira KL, De Camargo ZA, Pinho SMR. Vocal range in amateur gospel choir singers. Rev CEFAC. 2006;8(1):96-106.

20 Zimmer V, Cielo CA, Ferreira FM. Vocal behavior of popular singers. Rev CEFAC. 2011;14(2):298-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462011005000101.

21 Lustosa KL, Silva TFA. Health Education as Potentiality in the Teacher’s Vocal Health Care. REVASF. 2018;8(17):39-57.

22 Castro TPPG, Monteiro VCQ, Martins HA, Coutinho WL. Vocal Symptoms and Complaints Related to the Work of Public School Teachers. Rev Port Saúde e Soc. 2020;5(1):1340-50.

23 Araújo MVR. Ilness at work: the discourse of teleoperators about voice disorders. Distúrb Comun. 2013;25(1):91-101.

24 Abou-Rafée M, Zambon F, Badaró F, Behlau M. Vocal fatigue in dysphonic teachers who seek treatment. CoDAS. 2019;31(3):e20180120. PMid:31188907.

25 Carvalho CGDO, Ribeiro MFM. Correlation between vocal handicap and quality of life of popular singers. CoDAS. 2021;33(4):20190136. PMid:34431859.

26 Meerschman I, D’haeseleer E, Cammu H, Kissel I, Papeleu T, Leyns C, et al. Voice quality of choir singers and the effect of a performance on the voice. J Voice. 2022;11:1-10. ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.08.017. PMid:36130858.

27 Sandage MJ, Hoch M. Exercise physiology: perspective for vocal training. J Sing. 2018;74(4):419-25.

28 Masson MLV, Fabbron EMG, Loiola-Barreiro CM. Vocal warm-up and cool-down in teachers: a quasi-experimental controlled study. CoDAS. 2019;31(4):e20180143. PMid:31531555.

29 Titze IR. Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989;85(4):1699-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.397959. PMid:2708686.

30 Moreti F, Rocha C, Borrego MCM, Behlau M. Desvantagem vocal no canto: análise do protocolo Índice de Desvantagem para o Canto Moderno - IDCM. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(2):146-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000200007.
 


Submetido em:
09/01/2023

Aceito em:
07/08/2023

6657875ea9539567026651d3 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections