Guia para a elaboração de relatórios fonoaudiológicos de crianças implantadas: opinião de especialistas
Guide to the preparation of speech reports for implanted children: opinion of specialists
Natália Barreto Frederigue-Lopes; Joice de Moura Silva; Flávia Custódio Pedroso de Souza; Marcela Beatriz Ricardo; Thais Corina Said de Angelo; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob; Adriane Lima Mortari Moret; Marina Morettin Zupelari
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a guide for the preparation of speech-language reports of implanted children to be shared among speech-language pathologists of cochlear implant (CI) services and rehabilitation professionals.
Methods: The Delphi method was used to select the relevant and fundamental items that should be included in the two versions proposed for the guide: Guide 1 - Speech-language reports provided by the CI services to rehabilitators, and Guide 2 - Speech-language reports provided by the rehabilitators to CI services. Twenty-one speech therapists specialized and with experience in cochlear implants and auditory rehabilitation participated in the discussion and judgment of the items during the selection rounds. Consensus was considered when the item reached agreement equal to or greater than 80% among participants, being selected to compose the two guides.
Results: After the two rounds, 21 items from Guide 1 reached consensus among therapists, that is, more than 80% of them agreed that these items should be present in the report sent by the CI service. For Guide 2, 22 items analyzed by speech therapists working in CI services in the postoperative sector were selected in the second round.
Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the two rounds, the “Guide for the preparation of speechlanguage pathology reports: intersection between CI service and rehabilitators” was developed. This material can be applied in the follow-up of implanted children, standardizing the information shared about the electronic device, evaluation results, monitoring of results and therapeutic process of this population.
Keywords
Referências
1 Estabrooks W. The auditory verbal approach. In: Schwarts S, editor. Choices in deafness. Bethesda: Woodbine House; 1996.
2 Ukstins CA, Welling DR. The speech-language pathologist in audiology services: an interprofessional collaboration. fundamentals of audiology for the speech-language pathologist [Internet]. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017. p. 2-14 [citado em 2022 Ago 15]. Disponível em:
3 Chua KW, Yuen HW. Inter-professional collaboration to improve outpatient attendance rates on a cochlear implant aural rehabilitation programme. Proc Singapore Healthcare. 2021;30(2):99-102.
4 Rotfleisch S, Martindale M. How do you if a child is making appropriate progress in auditory-verbal therapy and education? In: Estabrooks W, editor. 101 frequently asked questions about auditory-verbal practice. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; 2012.
5 Davis T, Choi D, Gordon-Hickey S, Estis J. Interprofessional collaborative practice trends between speech-language pathologists and audiologists. J Allied Health. 2021;50(2):104-10. PMid:34061929.
6 Ward KW, Grubbs K, Biswas A. Awareness and knowledge of cochlear implants among speech-language pathologists. Health Sci J. 2018;12(4):1.
7 Schafer EC, Grisel JJ, de Jong A, Ravelo K, Lam A, Burke M, et al. Creating a framework for data sharing in cochlear implant research. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17(6):283-92.
8 McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655-62.
9 Revorêdo LS, Maia R, Torres GV, Maia EMC. O uso da técnica Delphi em saúde: uma revisão integrativa de estudos brasileiros. Arq Ciênc Saúde. 2015;22(2):16-21.
10 Avella JR. Delphi panels: research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. Int J Dr Stud. 2016;11:305-21.
11 Aronson BD, Janke KK, Traynor AP. Investigating student pharmacist perceptions of professional engagement using a modified Delphi process. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(7):125.
12 Punch R, Hyde M. Rehabilitation efforts and stress in parents of children with cochlear implants. Aust N Z J Audiol. 2010;32(1):1-18.
13 Supporting Success for Children with Hearing Loss. Information exchange form: supporting the child with cochlear implant [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 2022 Ago 15]. Disponível em:
14 Athalye S, Archbold S, Mulla I, Lutman M, Nikolopoulous T. Exploring views on current and future cochlear implant service delivery: the perspectives of users, parents and professionals at cochlear implant centres and in the community. Cochlear Implants Int. 2015;16(5):241-53.
15 Ray C, Taylor E, Vasil KJ, Zombek L, Baxter JH, Moberly AC. The value of speech-language pathologists in auditory rehabilitation for adults with cochlear implants. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(4):1909-11.
Submetido em:
15/08/2022
Aceito em:
07/03/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email