Sensory profile of children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)
Perfil sensorial de crianças com Transtorno do Processamento Auditivo Central (TPAC)
Flávia Regina Ribeiro Cavalcanti Buffone; Eliane Schochat
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the sensory profile of children with auditory sensory processing disorder according to the Child Sensory Profile 2 and to verify potential associations between central auditory processing and sensory processing. Methods: Sixty children from two public schools in the city of João Pessoa, state of Paraíba, were evaluated. All children had their cognitive skills tested and their socioeconomic and demographic information collected. The children’s hearing, central auditory processing, and sensory processing were evaluated. SPSS Statistics version 25.0 was used for data analysis and the significant value adopted was 0.05. Descriptive analysis was performed using the central tendency method. The similarities among the test variables were measured by Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. The effect size (ES) between the groups was measured by Cohen’s d or Rosenthal’s r coefficient. Results: The average age of children with CAPD was 8.4 years, and their families had lower levels of income and education when compared to those without the disorder. Children with CAPD present more sensory differences than their peers with normative CAP. The Child Sensory Processing 2 results didn’t show any statistic associations with central auditory processing, and the effect size was of moderate magnitude for the visual system. Conclusion: Children with CAPD have more sensory differences than their peers according to the normative results of the Child Sensory Profile 2. An association between sensory and central auditory processing was not observed, except for the visual system.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo:Analisar o perfilsensorial de crianças com TPAC, de acordo com o Child Sensory Profile 2 e verificar possíveis associações entre o PAC e o PS. Método: Foram avaliadas 60 crianças em idade escolar de duas escolas públicas de João Pessoa, PB. Todas realizaram triagem cognitiva, tiveram suas informações socioeconômicas colhidas e foram submetidas às avaliações audiológica, do processamento auditivo central e do processamento sensorial. A análise dos dados foi feita com o SPSS Statistics, versão 25.0, e o valor de significância adotado foi de 0,05. Foi realizada a análise descritiva com medidas de tendência central. A associação entre as variáveis foi medida pelos testes t de Student e U de Mann-Whitney. O tamanho do efeito da diferença entre os grupos foi medido pelo coeficiente d de Cohen ou r de Rosenthal. Resultados: As crianças com TPAC tinham idade média de 8,4 anos, e suas famílias apresentaram renda e escolaridade inferior aquelas sem alteração do processamento auditivo. Foi observado que crianças com TPAC apresentam mais diferenças sensoriais que seus pares com PAC normal. Os resultados do Child Sensory Profile 2 não mostrou associação estatística com o processamento auditivo e a magnitude do tamanho do efeito entre as variáveis foi moderada para o sistema visual. Conclusão: Crianças com TPAC tem mais diferenças sensoriais que seus pares de acordo com o resultado normativo do Child Sensory Profile 2. Não foi observada associação entre o processamento sensorial e auditivo central, com exceção do sistema visual.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Ayres AJ. Sensory integration and the child. understanding hidden sensory challenges. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2007. 211 p.
2. Miller LJ, Anzalone ME, Lane S, Cermak SA, Osten ET. Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61(2):135-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.135. PMid:17436834.
3. Pfeiffer B, May-Benson TA, Bodison SC. State of the science of sensory integration research with children and youth.Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(1):1- 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.721003. PMid:29280710.
4. Dunn W. Sensory profile: user’s manual. Bloomington: PsychCorp; 2014. 268 p.
5. Vasak M, Williamson J, Garden J, Zwicker JG. Sensory processing and sleep in tipically developing infants and toddlers. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(4):1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.015891. PMid:26114460.
6. Nakagawa A, Sukigara M, Miyachi T, Nakai A. Relations between temperament, sensory processing, and motor coordination in 3-yearold children. Front Psychol. 2016;7:623. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2016.00623. PMid:27199852.
7. Green SA, Ben-Sasson A, Soto TW, Carter AS. Anxiety and sensory over-responsivity in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: bidirectional effects acrosstime.JAutism Dev Disord. 2012;42(6):1112-9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10803-011-1361-3. PMid:21935727.
8. Farrow CV, Coulthard H. Relationships between sensory sensitivity, anxiety and selective eating in children.Appetite. 2012;58(3):842-6. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.017. PMid:22326881.
9. Keith RW. Clinical issues in central auditory processing disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1999;30(4):339-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/0161- 1461.3004.339. PMid:27764342.
10. AAA: American Academy of Audiology. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD). Reston: AAA; 2010.
11. Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. JAmAcadAudiol. 2000;11(9):467-74. PMid:11057730.
12. Oliveira AM, Cardoso ACV, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares com distúrbio de aprendizagem e dislexia em testes de processamento auditivo. Rev CEFAC. 2011;13(3):513-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1516-18462010005000126.
13. Gavin WJ, Dotseth A, Roush KK, Smith CA, Spain HD, Davies PL. Eletroencephalography in Children with and without Sensory Processing Disorders DuringAuditory Perception.Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65(4):370- 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.002055. PMid:21834451.
14. Raven JC, Raven J, Court JH. Matrizes progressivas coloridas de Raven: manual. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 1988.
15. Pereira LD. Processamento auditivo. Temas Desenvolv. 1993;2(11):7-14.
16. Ziliotto KN, Kalil DM, Almeida CIR. PSI em português. In: Pereira LD, Schochat E, editores. Processamento auditivo central: manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise; 1997. p. 113-28.
17. Pereira LD, Santos MFC. Escuta com dígitos. In: Pereira LD, Schochat E, editores. Processamento auditivo central: manual de avaliação. São Paulo: Lovise; 1997. p. 147-50.
18. Keith R. Random gap detection test. St. Louis: Auditec; 2000.
19. Vilela N, Wertzner HF, Sanches SGG, Neves-Lobo IF, Carvalho RMM. Processamento temporal de crianças com transtorno fonológico submetidas ao treino auditivo: estudo piloto.J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;24(1):42-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-64912012000100008. PMid:22460371.
20. Rance G, Tomlin D. Maturation of the central auditory nervous system in children with auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear. 2016;37(1):74-83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570328. PMid:27587924.
21. Barreira HAB, Silva M, Branco-Barreiro FC, SamelliAG. Desempenho de escolares de 7 a 12 anos do teste Gaps-in-Noise. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(4):441-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000400013.
22. Souza MA, Passaglio NJS, Souza VC, Scopel RR, Lemos MA. Ordenação temporalsimples e localização sonora: associação com fatores ambientais e desenvolvimento de linguagem.Audiol Commun Res. 2015;20(1):24-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312015000100001443.
23. Neves KR, Morais RLS, Teixeira RA, Pinto PAF. Growth and development and their environmental and biological determinants.J Pediatr. 2016;92(3):241- 50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.08.007. PMid:26772895.
24. Wu C, Stefanescu RA, Martel DT, Shore SE. Listening to another sense: somatosensory integration in the auditory system. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;361(1):233-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-2074-7. PMid:25526698.
25. Lane SJ, Mailloux Z, Schoen S, Bundy A, May-Benson TA, Parham LD, et al. Neural foundations of ayres sensory integration. Brain Sci. 2019;9(7):153. PMid:31261689.
26. Bar-Shalita T, Vatine JJ, Parush S. Sensory modulation disorder: a risk factor for participation in daily life activities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(12):932-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03095.x. PMid:19046186.
27. Mimouni-Bloch A, Offek H, Rosenblum S, Posener I, Silman Z, EngelYeger B. Association between sensory modulation and daily activity function of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and children with typical development. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;83:69-76. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.002. PMid:30142575.
28. Pedrosa C, Caçola P, Carvalhal MI. Fatores preditores do perfilsensorial de lactentes dos 4 aos 18 meses de idade. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2015;33(2):160-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2014.11.016. PMid:25887929.
29. Róman-Oyola R, Reynolds S. Prevalence of sensory modulation disorder among Puerto Rican preschoolers: an analysis focused on socioeconomic status variables. Occup Ther Int. 2013;20(3):144-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ oti.1353. PMid:23696328.
30. Bartie M, Dunnell A, Kaplan J, Oosthuizen D, Smit D, van Dyk A, et al. The play experiences of preschool children from a low socio-economic rural community in Worcester, SouthAfrica. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(2):91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.1404. PMid:26348391.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email