CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250428pt
CoDAS
Revisão Crítica ou Revisão de Escopo

A relação entre o bullying e a gagueira em escolares: revisão de escopo

The relationship between bullying and stuttering in schoolchildren: scoping review

Gislaine Aparecida Folha; Gabrielly Lemos Barbosa; Caio Rodrigues Felix; Hadassa Bighi Lima Baptista

Downloads: 0
Views: 32

Resumo

Objetivo: mapear e sintetizar evidências científicas sobre a relação entre bullying e gagueira em escolares. Serão investigados os objetivos específicos: (1) o impacto da coocorrência de ambos; (2) estratégias de identificação do bullying em crianças que gaguejam; e (3) abordagens para enfrentamento do bullying nessa população. Estratégia de pesquisa: Foi conduzida uma Scoping Review seguindo metodologia do Instituto Joanna Briggs. As bases de dados PubMed, Scielo, CAPES e Web of Science foram consultadas com descritores específicos. Critérios de seleção: foram incluídos artigos em inglês ou português com texto completo, sem limite temporal. Excluídos artigos de opinião, cartas ao editor e estudos que não responderam ao objetivo do trabalho. Análise dos dados: os dados extraídos incluíram autor, título, objetivos, metodologia, resultados e conclusões, culminando em um fluxograma PRISMA-ScR para organização dos achados. Resultados: os estudos analisados apontam maior prevalência de bullying, ansiedade e baixa autoestima entre crianças e adolescentes que gaguejam, especialmente no ambiente escolar. Relações sociais fragilizadas e falta de conscientização aumentam o risco de exclusão. O fonoaudiólogo tem papel essencial na orientação e prevenção, embora ainda haja necessidade de pesquisas mais robustas sobre intervenções eficazes. Conclusões: Este estudo confirmou a relação entre a gagueira e a vivência do bullying, evidenciando impactos na saúde mental e na socialização das pessoas que gaguejam. Além disso, embora escassas, foram reunidas as principais estratégias de intervenção identificadas até o momento, como programas educativos e atividades de prevenção, ainda no ambiente escolar e em conjunto com o corpo acadêmico e familiares.

Palavras-chave

Gagueira,Transtorno da Fluência com Início na Infância; Bullying; Distúrbios da Fala; Criança

Abstract

Purpose: to map and synthesise scientific evidence on the relationship between bullying and stuttering in schoolchildren. The following specific aims will be investigated: (1) the impact of the co-occurrence of both; (2) strategies for identifying bullying in children who stutter; and (3) approaches to tackling bullying in this population. Research strategies: Scoping Review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The PubMed, Scielo, CAPES, and Web of Science databases were consulted using specific descriptors. Selection criteria: Full-text articles in English or Portuguese were included, with no time limit. Opinion articles, letters to the editor, and studies that did not meet the objective of the study were excluded. Data analysis: The data extracted included author, title, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions, culminating in a PRISMA-ScR flowchart for organising the findings. Results: The studies analysed point to a higher prevalence of bullying, anxiety and low self-esteem among children and adolescents who stutter, especially in the school environment. Weakened social relationships and lack of awareness increase the risk of exclusion. Speech therapists play an essential role in guidance and prevention, although there is still a need for more robust research on effective interventions. Conclusion: This study confirmed the relationship between stuttering and the experience of bullying, highlighting the impacts on the mental health and socialisation of people who stutter. In addition, although scarce, the main intervention strategies identified to date were gathered, such as educational programmes and prevention activities, still in the school environment and in conjunction with the academic staff and family members.

Keywords

Stuttering; Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder; Bullying; Speech Disorders; Child

Referências

  • 1Reeves N, Herring C, Yaruss J. How speech-language pathologists can minimize bullying of children who stutter. Semin Speech Lang. 2018;39(4):342-55. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667163 PMid:30142645.
    » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667163
  • 2Bossaert G, de Boer AA, Frostad P, Pijl SJ, Petry K. Social participation of students with special educational needs in different educational systems. Ir Educ Stud. 2015;34(1):43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2015.1010703
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2015.1010703
  • 3Langevin M. Helping children deal with teasing and bullying. In: Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. New Orleans: ASHA; 2001. p. 10-14.
  • 4Zamprogno MP, Mandrá PP, Gonçalves TC, Jorge TM. Experiences of violence at school from the stuttering patients’ perspective. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(6):e6020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202266020
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202266020
  • 5Murphy B. Speech pathologists can help children who are teased because they stutter. In: International Stuttering Awareness Day (ISAD) Online Conference. Minnesota: Minnesota State University; 2000. p. 1-22.
  • 6Lowe R, Jelčić Jakšić S, Onslow M, O’Brian S, Vanryckeghem M, Millard S, et al. Contemporary issues with stuttering: the Fourth Croatia Stuttering Symposium. J Fluency Disord. 2021;70:105844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105844 PMid:34049093.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105844
  • 7Hugh-Jones S, Smith PK. Self-reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer. Br J Educ Psychol. 1999;69(2):141-58. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157626 PMid:10405616.
    » https://doi.org/10.1348/000709999157626
  • 8Murphy WP, Quesal RW. Strategies for addressing bullying with the school-age child who stutters. Semin Speech Lang. 2002;23(3):205-12. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33754 PMid:12207277.
    » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33754
  • 9Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI Systematic Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020. p. 14-22. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-02
    » https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-02
  • 10Blood GW, Blood IM. Preliminary study of self-reported experience of physical aggression and bullying of boys who stutter: relation to increased anxiety. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104(3, Suppl):1060-6. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.104.3.1060-1066 PMid:17879638.
    » https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.104.3.1060-1066
  • 11Mandrá PP, Cassini M, Gonçalves TC, Kuroishi RCS. Ações educativas em saúde: satisfação em relação à campanha de atenção à gagueira. Arq Cienc Saude. 2017;24(1):86-92. https://doi.org/10.17696/2318-3691.24.1.2017.514
    » https://doi.org/10.17696/2318-3691.24.1.2017.514
  • 12Blood GW, Boyle MP, Blood IM, Nalesnik GR. Bullying in children who stutter: speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and intervention strategies. J Fluency Disord. 2010;35(2):92-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.03.003 PMid:20609331.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.03.003
  • 13Murphy WP, Yaruss JS, Quesal RW. Enhancing treatment for school-age children who stutter II: reducing bullying through role-playing and self-disclosure. J Fluency Disord. 2007;32(2):139-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.02.001 PMid:17499126.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.02.001
  • 14Kikuchi Y, Umezaki T, Sawatsubashi M, Taura M, Yamaguchi Y, Murakami D, et al. Experiences of teasing and bullying in children who stutter. Int Arch Commun Disord. 2019;2(2):13. https://doi.org/10.23937/2643-4148/1710013
    » https://doi.org/10.23937/2643-4148/1710013
  • 15Bernard RFL, Norbury CF. Factors associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression in children who stutter. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2023;54(2):535-49. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00086 PMid:36800488.
    » https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00086
  • 16McAllister J, Skinner J, Hayhow R, Heron J, Wren Y. The association between atypical speech development and adolescent self-harm. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023;66(5):1600-17. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-21-00652 PMid:37080239.
    » https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-21-00652
  • 17Davis S, Howell P, Cooke F. Sociodynamic relationships between children who stutter and their non-stuttering classmates. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43(7):939-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00093 PMid:12405481.
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00093
  • 18Karahan Tığrak T, Kulak Kayıkcı ME, Kirazlı MÇ, Tığrak A. Emotional and behavioural problems of children and adolescents who stutter: comparison with typically developing peers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2021;46(4):186-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1855472 PMid:33355015.
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1855472
  • 19Silva LK, Martins-Reis VO, Maciel TM, Ribeiro JKBC, Souza MA, Chaves FG. Gagueira na escola: efeito de um programa de formação docente em gagueira. CoDAS. 2016;28(3):261-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015158 PMid:27383227.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015158
  • 20Logan KJ, Mullins MS, Jones KM. The depiction of stuttering in contemporary juvenile fiction: implications for clinical practice. Psychol Sch. 2008;45(7):609-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20313
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20313
  • 21Conselho Federal de Fonoaudiologia. Resolução CFFa nº 507/2017 [Internet]. Brasília, DF: CFFa; 2017 [citado 3 dez 2025]. Disponível em: https://www.fonoaudiologia.org.br/resolucoes/resolucoes_html/CFFa_N_507_17.htm
    » https://www.fonoaudiologia.org.br/resolucoes/resolucoes_html/CFFa_N_507_17.htm
  • 22Kira CF, Alpes MF, Mandrá PP. Construção e validação de conteúdo de material educativo sobre gagueira. Research Society and Development. 2023;12(4):e13612440925. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i4.40925
    » https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i4.40925
  • 23Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
    » https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Submetido em:
11/12/2025

Aceito em:
04/02/2026

6aa99d7ba953956aa40171f2 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections