Validação e normatização da Escala de Autopercepção de Habilidades do Processamento Auditivo Central (EAPAC) - expandida
Validation and standardization of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded
Luciana Cássia de Jesus; Luciana Mendonça Alves; Luciana Macedo de Resende
Resumo
Objetivo: validar e normatizar a aplicação on-line da Escala de Autopercepção de Habilidades do Processamento Auditivo Central (EAPAC) – expandida para adultos brasileiros. Método: A Escala de Autopercepção de Habilidades do Processamento Auditivo Central foi expandida e respondida por 1274 indivíduos brasileiros com idade entre 18 e 59 anos. Desses, 116 sujeitos foram submetidos à avaliação neuropsicológica e auditiva e 63 foram selecionados para responder à escala em um segundo momento. Foram excluídos aqueles com perda auditiva de qualquer tipo e grau, histórico de terapia fonoaudiológica para o transtorno do processamento auditivo central e alteração psiquiátrica e/ou neurológica. Foi realizada a análise descritiva das variáveis, a análise fatorial exploratória e a curva ROC, para validação e normatização. O teste de Wilcoxon foi utilizado para comparar as respostas dos sujeitos que responderam à escala em dois momentos. Resultados: Após a análise fatorial exploratória, cinco questões foram excluídas, pois não correlacionaram com os domínios da escala. As curvas ROC, construídas considerando a presença do transtorno do processamento auditivo e o resultado por processos auditivos, não apontaram valores significativos, sendo assim, a escala apresentou valores frágeis de sensibilidade e especificidade. Não houve diferença significativa entre as respostas dos sujeitos, na escala, em dois momentos diferentes. Conclusão: A escala expandida não apresentou padrões psicométricos adequados para identificação do risco para o transtorno do processamento auditivo central, mas mostrou-se útil para investigar as queixas auditivas em tarefas do cotidiano, e, assim, auxiliar na seleção de estratégias para minimizar o impacto negativo das dificuldades referidas.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To validate and standardize the online application of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) – expanded for Brazilian adults. Methods: The EAPAC was expanded and answered by 1,274 Brazilian individuals aged 18 to 59 years. Of these, 116 subjects underwent neuropsychological and auditory evaluation, and 63 were selected to answer the scale at a second time point. Those with any type and degree of hearing loss, history of speech-language-hearing therapy for central auditory processing disorder, and psychiatric and/or neurological alteration were excluded. Descriptive analysis of the variables, exploratory factor analysis, and ROC curve were performed for validation and standardization. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the responses of the subjects who answered the scale at two time points. Results: After exploratory factor analysis, five questions were excluded, as they did not correlate with the scale domains. The ROC curves, constructed considering the presence of auditory processing disorder and the result by auditory processes, did not indicate significant values. Thus, the scale presented fragile sensitivity and specificity values. There was no significant difference in the subjects’ responses to the scale between the two time points. Conclusion: The expanded scale did not present adequate psychometric standards for identifying the risk for central auditory processing disorder, but it proved useful for investigating auditory complaints in everyday tasks, thus helping to select strategies to minimize the negative impact of the difficulties mentioned.
Keywords
References
- 1Fiamoncini JD, Silva AO, Sousa TR, Satler CE, Silva IMC, Cera ML. Association between linguistic-cognitive performance and auditory self-perception of elderly. Audiol Commun Res. 2022;27:e2597. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2021-2597
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2021-2597 - 2Davidson A, Souza P. Relationships between auditory processing and cognitive abilities in adults: A systematic review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024;67(1):296-345. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00716 PMid:38147487.
» https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00716 - 3Lunardelo PP, Fukuda MTH, Stefanelli ACGF, Zanchetta S. Behavioral assessment of auditory processing in adulthood: population of interest and tests – a systematic review. CoDAS. 2023;35(2):e20220044. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022044pt PMid:37132698.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022044pt - 4Akashi DA, Martinelli MC. Study of speech recognition in noise and working memory in adults and elderly with normal hearing. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;28(3):e473-80. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779432 PMid:38974622.
» https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779432 - 5Samara M, Thai-Van H, Ptok M, Glarou E, Veuillet E, Miller S, et al. A systematic review and metanalysis of questionnaires used for auditory processing screening and evaluation. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1243170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1243170 PMid:37621857.
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1243170 - 6Cancel VE, McHaney JR, Milne V, Palmer C, Parthasarathy A. A data‑driven approach to identify a rapid screener for auditory processing disorder testing referrals in adults. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13636. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0 PMid:37604867.
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0 - 7Turcatto LG, Scharlach RC, Braga J Jr, Pinheiro MMC. Time-compressed speech test in adults with and without central auditory processing disorders. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(4):e2520. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202242520
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20202242520 - 8Dias KZ, Yokoyama CH, Pinheiro MMC, Junior JB, Pereira LD, O’Hara B. The Auditory Processing Domains Questionnaire (APDQ): Brazilian-Portuguese version. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(6):823-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.12.001 PMid:35331656.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.12.001 - 9Souza IMP, Carvalho NG, Plotegher SDCB, Colella-Santos MF, Amaral MIR. Auditory processing screening: contributions of the combined use of questionnaire and auditory tasks. Audiol Commun Res. 2018;23:e2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-2021
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2018-2021 - 10Nunes CL, Pereira LD, Carvalho GS. Scale of Auditory Behaviors and auditory behavior tests for auditory processing assessment in Portuguese children. CoDAS. 2013;25(3):209-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000300004 PMid:24408330.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000300004 - 11O’Hara B, Mealings K. Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(10):764-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087 PMid:30063869.
» https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1487087 - 12Freitas GMD. The Auditory Processing Domains Questionnaire–APDQ em adultos com déficits em processamento auditivo [monografia]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2021.
- 13Abreu NCB, Jesus LC, Alves LM, Mancini PC, Labanca L, Resende LM. Validação da Escala de Autopercepção de Habilidades do Processamento Auditivo Central (EAPAC) para adultos. Audiol Commun Res. 2022;27:e2577. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2021-2577
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2021-2577 - 14Pereira BS, Resende LM, Jesus LC, Escarce AG, Alves LM. Auditory and academic skills self-perception in adults. CoDAS. 2024;36(3):e20230098. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023098en PMid:38896744.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023098en - 15Arora A, Dessai TD, Bhat RJ. Screening for auditory processing difficulties in older adults with hearing impairment using screening checklist for auditory processing in adults. J Int Adv Otol. 2023;19(2):87-92. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.22752 PMid:36975079.
» https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.22752 - 16WHO: World Health Organization. Prevention of blindness and deafness [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020 [citado em 28 mai 2020]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/publications-detail/basic-ear-and-hearing-care-resource
» http://www.who.int/publications-detail/basic-ear-and-hearing-care-resource - 17Burguetti FAR, Peloggia AG, Carvallo RMM. Limiares de audibilidade em altas frequências em indivíduos com queixa de zumbido. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;8(4):292-8.
- 18Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311-24. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002 PMid:5455571.
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002 - 19Pereira LD, Schochat E. Testes auditivos comportamentais para avaliação do processamento auditivo central. São Paulo: Pró-Fono; 2011.
- 20Auditec. Evaluation manual of pitch pattern sequence and duration pattern sequence. Saint Louis: Auditec; 1997.
- 21Academia Brasileira de Audiologia. Encontro Internacional de Audiologia, 31º Fórum: Diagnóstico audiológico. Recomendações e valores de referência para o protocolo de avaliação do PAC: comportamental e eletrofisiológica. São Paulo; ABA: 2016.
- 22Fonseca RP, Salles JF, Parente MAMP. Instrumento de Avaliação Neuropsicolinguística Breve NEUPSILIN. São Paulo: Vetor; 2009.
- 23BSA: British Society of Audiology. Position Statement and Practice Guidance: Auditory Processing Disorders (APD) [Internet]. Reston: BSA; 2018 [citado em 22 mar 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Position-Statement-and-Practice-Guidance-APD-2018.pdf
» https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Position-Statement-and-Practice-Guidance-APD-2018.pdf - 24Volpatto FL, Rechia IC, Lessa AH, Soldera CLC, Ferreira MIDC, Machado MS. Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85(1):99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.003 PMid:29970341.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.003 - 25Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 PMid:28977189.
» https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022 - 26Trassi AP, Oliveira KL, Inácio ALM. Compreensão leitora, estratégias de aprendizagem e raciocínio verbal: relações possíveis. Psico-USF. 2019;24(4):615-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712019240401
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712019240401 - 27Dias NM, Costa DM, Cardoso CO, Colling APC, Fonseca RP. Executive functions intervention program for academic learning for young people/undergraduate students: development and evidence of content validity. Cienc Psicol (Montev). 2021;15(2):1-19. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i2.2394
» https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i2.2394 - 28Skarżyński H, Bieńkowska K, Gos E, Skarżyński PH, Grudzień D, Czajka N, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the scale of auditory behaviors questionnaire. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019;50(4):683-92. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-0014 PMid:31513758.
» https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-0014 - 29BSA: British Society of Audiology. Position statement: Auditory processing disorder (APD) [Internet]. Reston: BSA; 2011 [citado em 22 abr 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/OD104-39-Position-Statement-APD-2011-1.pdf
» https://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/OD104-39-Position-Statement-APD-2011-1.pdf - 30Hind SE, Haines-Bazrafshan R, Benton CL, Brassington V, Towle B, Moore DR. Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(10):708-16. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2011.582049 PMid:21714709.
» https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2011.582049 - 31Sanguebuche TR, Peixe BP, Garcia MV. Behavioral tests in adults: reference values and comparison between groups presenting or not central auditory processing disorder. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(1):e13718. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/202022113718
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/202022113718 - 32Arseno VA, Carvalho CA, Castro MP, Duarte SG, Reis ACMB, Marangoni AC, et al. Comparative study of temporal resolution test results in young adults. Rev CEFAC. 2016;18(6):1277-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161864312
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620161864312 - 33Costa LD, Vaucher AVA, Costa MJ. The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults. CoDAS. 2024;36(2):e20230093. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt PMid:38597550.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt
Submitted date:
06/15/2025
Accepted date:
12/02/2025


