Confiabilidade entre as medidas obtidas pelo paquímetro e por fotografia digital na antropometria facial
Reliability between measurements obtained by caliper and digital photography in facial anthropometry
Rayssa Silva Santos Andrade; Paulo Vitor de Oliveira Santos Matos; Maria Inês Beltrati Cornacchioni Rehder; Raphaela Barroso Guedes-Granzotti; Kelly da Silva; Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro César
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Referências
1 Goodacre CJ, Roberts WE, Goldstein G, Wiens JP. Does the stomatognathic system adapt to changes in occlusion? Best evidence consensus statement. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(S1):5-11.
2 Ujvári Z, Metzger M, Gárdonyi G. A consistent methodology for forensic photogrammetry scanning of human remains using a single handheld DSLR camera. Forensic Sci Res. 2023;8(4):295-307.
3 Cascos R, Ortiz del Amo L, Álvarez-Guzmán F, Antonaya-Martín JL, Celemín-Viñuela A, Gómez-Costa D, et al. Accuracy between 2D photography and dual-structured light 3D facial scanner for facial anthropometry: a clinical study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):3090.
4 César CPHAR, Bommarito S, Loyola RC. Perícia de face. In: Lopes L, Machado APL, Azoni CAS, Benatti JF, Santos RS, Ribeiro VV, et al., editores. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. 3. ed. São Paulo: Soc Bras Fonoaudiologia; 2024. p. 616-26.
5 Batista QR. Possibilidades da fonoaudiologia forense na identificação humana. Rev Disc Uniflu. [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 2025 Mar 14];2(2):80-98. Disponível em:
6 Reis WS. Análise forense de imagens digitais no estudo de caso da ficha criminal de Dilma Rousseff. Análise. [Internet]. 2018 [citado em 2025 Mar 14];1:1-26. Disponível em:
7 Souza PJS, Corrêa CC, Yaedú RYF, Berretin-Felix G. Use of simulation technology for teaching of facial analysis in speech-language therapy. Online J Distance Educ Elearn. [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 2025 Mar 14];9(2):321-33. Disponível em:
8 Grother P, Ngan M, Hanaoka K. Face recognition vendor test (FRVT) Part 3: demographic effects. Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2019. Report No.: NISTIR 8280.
9 Nunes EL, Cardoso MCAF. Validação de conteúdo de um instrumento de triagem em motricidade orofacial. Res Soc Dev. 2023;12(1):e19212139785.
10 Bacci N, Briers N, Steyn M. Prioritising quality: investigating the influence of image quality on forensic facial comparison. Int J Legal Med. 2024;138(4):1-14.
11 Freepik. 2025 [citado em 2025 Mar 4]. Disponível em:
12 Blasi A, Nucera R, Rosinvalle V, Candida E, Grippaudo C. Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;162(3):394-402.
13 Aynechi N, Larson BE, Leon-Salazar V, Beiraghi S. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(2):245-52.
14 Serrano LE. Ferramenta digital para análise facial frontal na Odontologia utilizando a inteligência artificial [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2024 [citado em 2024 Out 24]. 45 p. Disponível em:
15 Stukaite-Ruibiene E, Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Obertova Z, Simkunaite-Rizgeliene R, Barkus A, et al. Photoanthropometric study: are non-professional photographs suitable for objective and reliable analysis of facial features? Ann Hum Biol. 2024;51(1):2414991.
16 Marchesan IQ, Berretin-Félix G, Genaro KF. MBGR protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores. Int J Orofacial Myology. 2012;38(1):38-77.
17 Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32(3):307-17.
18 Alexandre NMC, Gallasch CH, Lima MHM, Rodrigues RCM. A confiabilidade no desenvolvimento e avaliação de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Rev Eletr Enferm. 2013;15(3):802-9.
19 Miola AC, Miot HA. Comparing categorical variables in clinical and experimental studies. J Vasc Bras. 2022;21:e20210225.
20 Alves YB, Falcão TN, Fernandes LM, Nóbega JBM, Lima LNC, Machado CEP, et al. A fotoantropometria como método de análise facial para estimativa de idade forense: revisão sistemática. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(2):e60010212469.
21 Villanueva-Bonilla S, Saavedra-Layera L, Vergara-Núñez C. Comparación de mediciones antropométricas directa y con sistema de imagen 3D, en adultos jóvenes. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2018;11(1):16-9.
22 Smith K, Wilkinson C. The doppelgänger effect? A comparative study of forensic facial depiction methods. Forensic Sci Int. 2024;356:111935.
23 Duckett LJ. Quantitative research excellence: study design and reliable and valid measurement of variables. J Hum Lact. 2021;37(3):456-63.
24 Ferreira EAG, Duarte M, Maldonado EP, Burke TN, Marques AP. Postural assessment software (PAS/SAPO): validation and reliability. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(7):675-81.
25 Miot HA, Pivotto DR, Jorge EN, Mazeto GMFS. Avaliação de parâmetros métricos oculares pela fotografia digital da face: uso do diâmetro da íris como unidade de referência. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71(5):679-83.
26 Stocchero IN, Stocchero GF, Stocchero GF, Fonseca ASF. Método de avaliação da suspensão do SMAS no rejuvenescimento facial. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2012;27(3):392-7.
27 Seneschal J, Duplaine A, Maillard H, Passeron T, Andreu N, Lassalle R, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus 0.1% for the treatment of facial vitiligo: a multicenter randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(7):1728-34.
28 Sezgin N, Karadayi B. Sex estimation from biometric face photos for forensic purposes. Med Sci Law. 2023;63(2):105-13.
29 Farkas LG, Tompson B, Phillips JH, Katic MJ, Cornfoot ML. Comparison of anthropometric and cephalometric measurements of the adult face. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10(1):18-25, discussion 26.
30 Bolzan GP, Costa MC, Correa EC, Haeffner LS. Agreement between anthropometry and cephalometry methods in classification of the facial type. Rev CEFAC. 2014;16(1):222-7.
31 Choi KY. Analysis of facial asymmetry. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015;16(1):1-10.
32 Nakamura T, Okamoto K, Maruyama T. Facial asymmetry in patients with cervicobrachial pain and headache. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(11):1009-14.
33 Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Fernández M, Kaynig AK, Pietzsch PC, Preibisch S, et al. The IMAGEJ® ecosystem: an open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol Reprod Dev. 2015;82(7-8):518-29.
34 Falcão TN, Silva MRS, Lima FS, Souza RF, Pereira JM, Almeida AC, et al. Photoanthropometry in forensics: comparison of facial images with frontal and lateral views. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(5):e27610514795.
35 Jodeh DS, Rottgers SA. High-fidelity anthropometric facial measurements can be obtained from a single stereophotograph from the Vectra H1 3-dimensional camera. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(9):1164-70.
36 Pinto PHV, Leal RM, Silva RF, Gamba TO, Leite AF, Paranhos LR. Comparative analysis between linear measures from bidimensional and three-dimensional images of the face for human identification purpose: a pilot study. J Orofac Sci. 2021;13(1):19-27.
37 Andrade NN, Mathai P, Aggarwal N. Facial asymmetry. In: Bonanthaya K, Paneerselvam E, Manuel S, Kumar VV, Rai A, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 1549-76.
38 Almeida EC Jr, Silva FR, Pereira JA, Lima TS, Costa AR. Investigação do sexo através de uma área triangular facial formada pela interseção dos pontos: forame infraorbital direito, esquerdo e o próstio, em crânios secos de adultos. Rev Ciênc Méd Biol. 2010;9(Supl 1):8-12.
Submetido em:
30/05/2025
Aceito em:
07/09/2025
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Reddit
Email