Accuracy of tympanometry cutoff points in children from Central-Western Brazil
Cláudia Cruvinel Câmara; Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino; Paulo Sergio Sucasas da Costa; Alexandre Siqueira Guedes Coelho; Maria Claret Costa Monteiro Hadler
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated tympanometric cutoff points (tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance) for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and determined their diagnostic accuracy. Methods: This analytical study, based on a randomized clinical trial, included 84 children (6–42 months; median 24 months) from public childcare centers in Brazil. Associations between cutoff points and TEOAEs were verified by Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square. Kappa assessed agreement between ears, and the correlation between tympanometric peak pressure and static compliance was analyzed by Spearman. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves and confirmed with EpiDat 3.1. Results: In the 84 children, 66 right ears and 73 left ears were examined; however, 42 ears were randomly selected from each side for the final analysis. A significant correlation was found between peak pressure and static compliance. ROC analysis identified -180 daPa as the most accurate cutoff (AUC = 0.781; 95% CI: 0.656–0.905; p < 0.001). EpiDat indicated a specificity of 93.9%, a sensitivity of 55.6%, and an overall accuracy of 85.7%. Static compliance <0.2 mL showed comparable performance (specificity = 98.5%, sensitivity = 50.0%, accuracy = 88.1%). Conclusion: The cutoff point of –180 daPa combined with static compliance <0.2 mL improved screening accuracy and reduced unnecessary referrals. It provided the best balance between specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy, aligning more closely with TEOAEs results and supporting updating this tympanometric criterion in infant hearing screening
Keywords
Referências
- 1World Health Organization. Hearing screening: Considerations for implementation [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [cited 2025 Mar 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032767
» https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032767 - 2World Health Organization. Improving early childhood development policies and practices [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020 [cited 2025 Mar 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400020986
» https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400020986 - 3Linares AE, Carvallo RMM. Acoustic immittance in children without otoacoustic emissions. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(3):410-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30576-0 PMid:18661016.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30576-0 - 4Yin L, Bottrell C, Clarke N, Shacks J, Poulsen MK. Otoacoustic emissions: a valid, efficient first-line hearing screen for preschool children. J Sch Health. 2009;79(4):147-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00383.x PMid:19292846.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00383.x - 5ASHA: American Speech Language Hearing Association. Childhood hearing screening protocols. Rockville: ASHA; 2022.
- 6Dworsack-Dodge MM, Gravel J, Grimes AM, Hunter L, Johnson K, Neault M, et al. American Academy of Audiology Practice Guidelines: assessment of hearing in infants and young children. Reston (VA): American Academy of Audiology; 2012.
- 7Sanfins MD, Menezes PL, Capra D, Andrade KCL, Frizzo ACF. Emissões otoacústicas transientes e por produto de distorção. In: Menezes PL, Sanfins MD, Capra D, Andrade KCL, Frizzo ACF, editors. Manual de eletrofisiologia e eletroacústica: um guia para clínicos. Ribeirão Preto: Book Toy; 2022. p. 69-82.
- 8Oprescu C, Beuran M, Nicolau AE. Tympanometry as a predictor factor in the evolution of otitis media with effusion. J Med Life. 2012;5(4):452-4. PMid:23346249.
- 9Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311-24. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002 PMid:5455571.
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002 - 10Jerger J, Jerger S, Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry: I. Normal and sensorineural ears. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;96(6):513-23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1972.00770090791004 PMid:4621039.
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1972.00770090791004 - 11Jerger J, Anthony L, Jerger S, Mauldin L. Studies in impedance audiometry: III. Middle ear disorders. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;99(3):165-71. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1974.00780030173003 PMid:4854446.
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1974.00780030173003 - 12Santos VF, Silva DTC, Py MO. Emissões otoacústicas como instrumento de triagem auditiva em 431 crianças de 1 a 12 anos. Distúrb Comun. 2014;26(1):5-14.
- 13Orchik DJ, Dunn JW, McNutt L. Tympanometry as a predictor of middle ear effusion. Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104(1):4-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1978.00790010008002 PMid:619884.
» https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1978.00790010008002 - 14Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Censo Escolar da Educação Básica 2022: resumo técnico. Brasília: Inep/MEC; 2022.
- 15Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
- 16Smith CG, Paradise JL, Sabo DL, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Bernard BS, et al. Tympanometric findings and the probability of middle-ear effusion in 3686 infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1879 PMid:16818543.
» https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1879 - 17Nozza RJ, Bluestone CD, Kardatzke D, Bachman R. Towards the validation of aural acoustic immittance measures for diagnosis of middle ear effusion in children. Ear Hear. 1992;13(6):442-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199212000-00010 PMid:1487106.
» https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199212000-00010 - 18Sanfins MD, Bertazolli LF, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynska MB, Donadon C, Colella-Santos MF. Otoacoustic emissions in children with long-term middle ear disease. Life. 2020;10(11):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110287 PMid:33217895.
» https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110287 - 19Sanfins MD, Donadon C, Borges LR, Skarzynski PH, Colella-Santos MF. Long-term effects of unilateral and bilateral otitis media and myringotomy on long-latency verbal and non-verbal auditory-evoked potentials. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24(4):e413-22. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697006 PMid:33101504.
» https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697006 - 20Colella-Santos MF, Donadon C, Sanfins MD, Borges LR. Otitis media: long-term effect on central auditory nervous system. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:8930904. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8930904 PMid:31032365.
» https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8930904 - 21Borges LR, Donadon C, Sanfins MD, Valente JP, Paschoal JR, Colella-Santos MF. The effects of otitis media with effusion on the measurement of auditory evoked potentials. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;133:109978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109978 PMid:32179206.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109978 - 22Simon F, Haggard M, Rosenfeld RM, Jia H, Peer S, Calmels MN, et al. International Consensus (ICON) on management of otitis media with effusion in children. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(1S):S89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.11.009 PMid:29398506.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.11.009 - 23Prieve BA, Fitzgerald TS, Schulte LE. Basic characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants and children. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(5 Pt 1):2860-70. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420341 PMid:9373973.
» https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420341 - 24Yin L, Bottrell C, Clarke N, Shacks J, Poulsen MK. Otoacoustic emissions: a valid, efficient first‐line hearing screen for preschool children. J Sch Health. 2009;79(4):147-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00383.x PMid:19292846.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00383.x - 25Colella-Santos MF, Bragato GR, Martins PMF, Dias AB. Hearing screening in schoolchildren aged 5 to 10 years. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(4):644-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009000800013
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009000800013 - 26Helenius KK, Laine MK, Tähtinen PA, Lahti E, Ruohola A. Tympanometry in discrimination of otoscopic diagnoses in young ambulatory children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(10):1003-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e31825cac94 PMid:22592519.
» https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e31825cac94 - 27Zielhuis GA, Heuvelmans-Heinen EW, Rach GH, van den Broek P. Environmental risk factors for otitis media with effusion in preschool children. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989;7(1):33-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813438909103668 PMid:2727458.
» https://doi.org/10.3109/02813438909103668 - 28Smith CG, Paradise JL, Sabo DL, Rockette HE, Kurs-Lasky M, Bernard BS, et al. Tympanometric findings and the probability of middle-ear effusion in 3686 infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1879 PMid:16818543.
» https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1879 - 29Jin L, Li K, Li X. Distortion product otoacoustic emission together with tympanometry for assessing otitis media with effusion in children. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(8):691-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2018.1439591 PMid:29504815.
» https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2018.1439591 - 30Parsel SM, Unis GD, Souza SS, Bartley H, Bergeron JM, Master AN, et al. Interpretation of normal and abnormal tympanogram findings in eustachian tube dysfunction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164(6):1272-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820965236 PMid:33076772.
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820965236 - 31Tustumi F. Choosing the most appropriate cut-point for continuous variables. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2022;49:e20223346. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223346-en PMid:35894391.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20223346-en - 32NHS England. Guidelines for surveillance and audiological referral for infants and children following newborn hearing screen. Leeds: NHS England; 2024.
Submetido em:
31/03/2025
Aceito em:
03/11/2025
