CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250057en
CoDAS
Original Article

Translation and cultural adaptation of the hyperacusis handicap questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese

Adriane da Silva Assis; Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos; Prashanth Prabhu; Patrícia Cotta Mancini

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250057en CoDAS, vol.38, n1, e20250057, 2026
PDF
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Purpose: To translate and culturally adapt the Hyperacusis Handicap Questionnaire (HHQ) to Brazilian Portuguese.

Methods: The cultural adaptation followed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and included five stages: 1) translation of the questionnaire from English to Brazilian Portuguese (BP) by two bilingual translators; 2) synthesis of the translations into a consensus version; 3) back-translation into English by two professional translators; 4) development of the pre-final version of the HHQ in Brazilian Portuguese by a committee of experts; and 5) testing of the pre-final and adjusted pre-final versions with individuals from the target population.

Results: No discrepancies were observed in the title, key responses, or questionnaire items throughout the translation process. In the pre-final version testing phase, more than 80% of participants understood the HHQ items in BP, demonstrating the effectiveness of the adaptation. However, four items were adjusted based on participants’ suggestions during the testing phase. Subsequently, the adjusted pre-final version was tested, with 100% of participants demonstrating comprehension of the items, confirming its appropriateness for the Brazilian population. During the linguistic equivalence assessment, none of the participants selected the "not applicable" option, further validating the relevance of the questions to the Brazilian context. Additionally, an introductory statement was added, providing detailed instructions on how to complete the questionnaire.

Conclusion: The cultural adaptation of the HHQ to Brazilian Portuguese was completed, resulting in the final version titled Hyperacusis Handicap Questionnaire in Brazilian Portuguese (HHQ-BP). Validation of this version is currently in progress.

Keywords

Hyperacusis, Indicators of Quality of Life, Self-assessment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translating, Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences

Referências

1 Vernon J. Pathophysiology of tinnitus: a special case – hyperacusis and a proposed treatment. Am J Otol. 1987;8(3):201-2. PMid:3631220.

2 Aazh H, Knipper A, Danesh AA, Cavanna AE, Andersson L, Paulin J, et al. Insights from the 3rd International Conference on Hyperacusis: causes, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Noise Health. 2018;20(95):162-70. PMid:30136676.

3 Parmar A, Prabhu PP. Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;280(3):985-1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07724-w. PMid:36350369.

4 Paulin J, Andersson L, Nordin S. Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population. Noise Health. 2016;18(83):178-84. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.189244. PMid:27569405.

5 Hall DA, Haider H, Szczepek AJ, Lau P, Rabau S, Jones-Diette J, et al. Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults. Trials. 2016;17(1):270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9. PMid:27250987.

6 Coelho CB, Sanchez TG, Tyler RS. Hyperacusis, sound annoyance, and loudness hypersensitivity in children. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:169-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66015-4. PMid:17956781.

7 Aazh H, McFerran D, Salvi R, Prasher D, Jastreboff M, Jastreboff P. Insights from the 1st International Conference on Hyperacusis: causes, evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. Noise Health. 2014;16(69):123-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.132100. PMid:24804717.

8 Tyler RS, Perreau A, Mancini PC. Hyperacusis. In: Tyler RS, Perreau A, editors. Tinnitus treatment: clinical protocols. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2022. p. 165-97.

9 Tyler RS, Noble W, Coelho C, Rocancio ER, Jun HJ. Tinnitus and hyperacusis. In: Katz J. Handbook of clinical audiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. p. 647-58.

10 Ke J, Du Y, Tyler RS, Perreau A, Mancini PC. Complaints of people with hyperacusis. J Am Acad Audiol. 2020;31(8):553-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709447. PMid:32340056.

11 Tyler RS. Interest in hyperacusis on the rise. Hear J. 2016;69(2):32-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000480889.17591.b4.

12 Aazh H, Moore BCJ. Effectiveness of audiologist-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for tinnitus and hyperacusis rehabilitation: outcomes for patients treated in routine practice. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(4):547-58. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0096. PMid:30242355.

13 Khalfa S, Dubal S, Veuillet E, Perez-Diaz F, Jouvent R, Collet L. Psychometric normalization of a Hyperacusis Questionnaire. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002;64(6):436-42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000067570. PMid:12499770.

14 Nelting M, Rienhoff NK, Hesse G, Lamparter U. The assessment of subjective distress related to hyperacusis with a self-rating questionnaire on hypersensitivity to sound. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002;81(5):327-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-28342. PMid:12001021.

15 Dauman R, Bouscau-Faure F. Assesment and amelioration of hyperacusis in tinnitus patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125(5):503-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480510027565. PMid:16092541.

16 Sherlock LP, Formby C. Considerations in the development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument. Semin Hear. 2017;38(1):53-70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598065. PMid:28286364.

17 Greenberg B, Carlos M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of a new scale to measure hyperacusis. Ear Hear. 2018;39(5):1025-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000583. PMid:29742543.

18 Aazh H, Danesh AA, Moore BCJ. Internal consistency and convergent validity of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms. Ear Hear. 2021;42(4):917-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000982. PMid:33259445.

19 Prabhu P, Nagaraj MK. Development and validation of Hyperacusis Handicap Questionnaire in individuals with tinnitus associated with hyperacusis. J Otol. 2020;15(4):124-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2019.12.004. PMid:33293911.

20 Bastos S, Sanchez TG. Validation of the Portuguese version of Hyperacusis Questionnaire and comparison of diagnostic skills with loudness discomfort levels. Otolaryngol Res Rev. 2017;1(1):49-54. https://doi.org/10.36959/926/551.

21 Tyler R, Ji H, Perreau A, Witt S, Noble W, Coelho C. Development and validation of the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(3):260-72. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0014. PMid:24811293.

22 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. PMid:20494804.

23 Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N. PMid:8263569.

24 Lloyd LL, Kaplan H. Audiometric interpretation: a manual of basic audiometry. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978.

25 Smid J, Studart-Neto A, César-Freitas KG, Dourado MCN, Kochhann R, Barbosa BJAP, et al. Subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia - syndromic approach: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Dement Neuropsychol. 2022;16(3, Suppl. 1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2022-s101pt. PMid:36533160.

26 Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311-24. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002. PMid:5455571.

27 Hawkins DB. Loudness discomfort levels: a clinical procedure for hearing aid evaluations. J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4501.03. PMid:7354628.

28 Johnson M. A tool for measuring hyperacusis. Hear J. 1999;52(3):34-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00025572-199903000-00004.

29 Zambon F, Moreti F, Nanjundeswaran C, Behlau M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the Vocal Fatigue Index - VFI. CoDAS. 2017;29(2):e20150261. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172015261. PMid:28300936.
 

Submetido em:
20/02/2025

Aceito em:
23/06/2025

698a5ce7a95395401e054e38 codas Articles
2317-1782 (Eletrônico)
CoDAS ©2026 Todos os direitos reservados.

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections