Fotobiomodulação na habilitação e reabilitação vocal: consenso Delphi baseado em especialistas
Photobiomodulation on vocal training and rehabilitation: Delphi consensus based on experts
Emerson Soares Pontes; Thays Garcia Vaiano; Roberto Sávio de Assunção Bastos; João Marcos da Trindade Duarte; Émile Rocha Santana; Leonardo Wanderley Lopes
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose To develop a consensus among speech-language pathologists who are voice specialists regarding the criteria for recommending and using photobiomodulation in the context of vocal therapy and training.
Methods Seven speech-language pathologists, experts in voice, and with experience in using photobiomodulation in vocal therapy and training participated. The Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus from a panel of experts accessed independently in two phases of collection. In Phase 1, the experts were contacted individually and participated in an interview with 12 questions to gather opinions on the use of photobiomodulation in the investigated context. The experts' responses were used to construct a questionnaire with 55 items presented as statements. The experts were asked to analyze each item and indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to investigate the degree of agreement among the judges and to select the final items of the consensus.
Results Consensus was reached among the experts on 34 items investigated in this study, with a CVC ≥ 0.75. It was observed that 31 items achieved an excellent CVC (≥ 0.78), 14 items with a good CVC (0.60 ≥ CVC ≤ 0.77) and 10 items with a poor CVC (≤ 0.59). The total CVC was considered excellent, with a value of 0.78.
Conclusion There was a consensus among experts about the use of photobiomodulation in vocal habilitation and rehabilitation. It has the potential to improve the criteria for prescribing and using this device by speech-language pathologists. The findings may be useful to improve the criteria for prescribing and the use of this device by speech-language pathologists, in addition to subsidizing the development of future research and clinical recommendations in the area.
Keywords
Referências
1 Behlau M. The 2016 G. Paul Moore Lecture: lessons in voice rehabilitation: journal of voice and clinical practice. J Voice. 2019;33(5):669-81.
2 Pontes MBP. Avaliação e tratamento das disfonias. São Paulo: Lovise; 1995.
3 Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen IN, Wilson JA. Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: reliability and validity of three self-reported scales. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(8):763-7.
4 Kiakojoury K, Dehghan M, Hajizade F, Khafri S. Etiologies of Dysphonia in Patients Referred to ENT Clinics Based on Videolaryngoscopy. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;26(76):169-74. PMid:25009807.
5 Lopes LW, Vilela EG. Autoavaliação e prontidão para mudança em pacientes disfônicos. CoDAS. 2016;28(3):295-301.
6 Stachler RJ, Francis DO, Schwartz SR, Damask CC, Digoy GP, Krouse HJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline: hoarseness (dysphonia) (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(1 Suppl):S1-42. http://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817751030.
7 Tierney WS, Xiao R, Milstein CF. Characterization of functional dysphonia: pre- and post-treatment findings. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(6):E1957-64.
8 Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge. J Voice. 2011;25(2):202-7.
9 Andrade SR, Cielo CA, Schwarz K, Ribeiro VV. Terapia vocal e sons nasais: efeitos sobre disfonias hiperfuncionais. Rev CEFAC. 2016;18(1):263-72.
10 Jesus Batista D, Lopes LW, Almeida AA, Siqueira LTD, Ribeiro VV. What factors determine the use of volitional and non-volitional devices in vocal interventions performed by brazilian speech-language pathologists? J Voice. 2023;0(0).
11 van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Doyle P, Gherson S, et al. Voice therapy according to the rehabilitation treatment specification system: expert consensus ingredients and targets. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(5):2169-201.
12 Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016;22(3):7000417.
13 Jagdeo J, Austin E, Mamalis A, Wong C, Ho D, Siegel DM. Light-emitting diodes in dermatology: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Surg Med. 2018;50(6):613-28.
14 Nampo FK, Cavalheri V, Santos Soares F, Paula Ramos S, Camargo EA. Low-level phototherapy to improve exercise capacity and muscle performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(9):1957-70.
15 Henriques ÁCG, Cazal C, Castro JFL. Ação da laserterapia no processo de proliferação e diferenciação celular: revisão da literatura. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2010;37(4):295-302.
16 Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (Light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516-33.
17 Kagan LS, Heaton JT. The effectiveness of low-level light therapy in attenuating vocal fatigue. J Voice. 2017;31(3):384.e15-23.
18 Oliveira P, Ribeiro VV, Florêncio DSF, Palhano M, Gonçalves RR, Alves do Nascimento M, et al. Vocal training in healthy individuals: a scoping review. J Voice. 2024;38(5):1250.e11-23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.03.004. PMid:35400555.
19 Kridgen S, Hillman RE, Stadelman-Cohen T, Zeitels S, Burns JA, Hron T, et al. Patient-reported factors associated with the onset of hyperfunctional voice disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021;130(4):389-94.
20 Hillman RE, Stepp CE, Van Stan JH, Zañartu M, Mehta DD. An updated theoretical framework for vocal hyperfunction. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(4):2254-60.
21 Zhang Z. Effect of vocal fold stiffness on voice production in a three-dimensional body-cover phonation model. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;142(4):2311-21.
22 Ferraresi C, Parizotto NA, Sousa MVP, Kaippert B, Huang YY, Koiso T, et al. Light-emitting diode therapy in exercise-trained mice increases muscle performance, cytochrome c oxidase activity, ATP and cell proliferation. J Biophotonics. 2015;8(9):740-54.
23 El Mobadder M, Farhat F, El Mobadder W, Nammour S. Photobiomodulation therapy in the treatment of oral mucositis, dysphagia, oral dryness, taste alteration, and burning mouth sensation due to cancer therapy: a case series. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(22):4505.
24 Costa SAP, Florezi GP, Artes GE, Costa JRD, Gallo RT, Freitas PM, et al. The analgesic effect of photobiomodulation therapy (830 nm) on the masticatory muscles: a randomized, double-blind study. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31(0):e107.
25 Gomes BS, Bomfim FRC, Lopes GJ Fo. A fotobiomodulação no processo cicatricial da pele-revisão da literatura. Braz J of Develop. 2020;6(9):66814-26.
26 Matos A, Berretin-Felix G, Bandeira R, et al. Laserterapia aplicada à motricidade orofacial: percepção dos membros da Associação Brasileira de Motricidade Orofacial-Abramo. Rev CEFAC. 2018;20(1):61-8.
27 Chen H, Wu H, Yin H, Wang J, Dong H, Chen Q, et al. Effect of photobiomodulation on neural differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(4):667-75.
28 Rubio DMG, Schoenbaum EE, Lee LS, Schteingart DE, Marantz PR, Anderson KE, et al. Defining translational research: implications for training. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):470-5.
29 Guimarães R. Pesquisa translacional: uma interpretação. Cien Saude Colet. 2013;18(6):1731-44.
30 Lin Y, Yamashita M, Zhang J, Ling C, Welham NV. Pulsed dye laser-induced inflammatory response and extracellular matrix turnover in rat vocal folds and vocal fold fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(8):585-94.
31 Marinho RR, Matos RM, Santos JS, Ribeiro MA, Smaniotto S, Barreto EO, et al. Potentiated anti-inflammatory effect of combined 780 nm and 660 nm low level laser therapy on the experimental laryngitis. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013;121:86-93.
32 Lou Z, Zhang C, Gong T, Xue C, Scholp A, Jiang JJ. Wound-healing effects of 635-nm low-level laser therapy on primary human vocal fold epithelial cells: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(3):547-54.
33 Greenwell T, Walsh B. Evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology: where are we now? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(1):186-98.
34 Campbell WN, Douglas NF. Supporting evidence-based practice in speech-language pathology: A review of implementation strategies for promoting health professional behavior change. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv. 2017;11(3-4):72-81.
35 Knaapen L. Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: the management of non-evidence in guideline development. Soc Stud Sci. 2013;43(5):681-706.
36 Armstrong D. Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors’ behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(10):1771-7.
37 Avella JR. Delphi panels: research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. Int J Dr Stud. 2016;11:305-21. http://doi.org/10.28945/3561.
38 Trevelyan EG, Robinson N. Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7(4):423-8.
39 Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401-9.
40 Veugelers R, Gaakeer MI, Patka P, Huijsman R. Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):156.
41 Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ, Thompson PA, Greenhalgh T. CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study. Identifying language impairments in children. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158753.
42 Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476.
43 Timmer AJ, Unsworth CA, Taylor NF. Occupational therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions with deconditioned older adults following an acute hospital admission: a Delphi study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(1):41-9.
44 Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376-82.
45 Barrios M, Guilera G, Nuño L, Gómez-Benito J. Consensus in the delphi method: what makes a decision change? Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;163:120484.
46 Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 2004;42(1):15-29.
47 McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655-62.
48 Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, Le Dorze G. Core outcomes in aphasia treatment research: an e-Delphi consensus study of international aphasia researchers. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25(4):S729-42.
49 Cooke K, Millard SK. The most important therapy outcomes for school-aged children who stutter: an exploratory study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(4S):1152-63.
50 Izaryk K, Skarakis-Doyle E. Using the delphi technique to explore complex concepts in speech-language pathology: an illustrative example from children’s social communication. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(4):1225-35.
51 Henderson RJ, Johnson AM, Moodie ST. Revised conceptual framework of parentto-parent support for parents of children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a modified delphi study. Am J Audiol. 2016;25(2):110-26.
52 Meibos A, Muñoz K, Twohig M. Counseling competencies in audiology: a modified Delphi study. Am J Audiol. 2019;28(2):285-99.
53 Starmer HM, Arrese L, Langmore S, Ma Y, Murray J, Patterson J, et al. Adaptation and validation of the dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity for flexible endoscopic evaluation of Swallowing: digest-fees. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(6):1802-10.
54 Hardin KY, Black C, Caldbick K, Kelly M, Malhotra A, Tidd C, et al. Current practices among speech-language pathologists for mild traumatic brain injury: A mixed-methods modified delphi approach. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30(4):1625-55.
55 Singer I, Klatte IS, Welbie M, Cnossen IC, Gerrits E. A multidisciplinary delphi consensus study of communicative participation in young children with language disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63(6):1793-806.
56 Wong ECH, Lee KYS, Tong MCF. The applicability of the clinical features of english childhood apraxia of speech to cantonese: A modified Delphi survey. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(2):652-63.
57 Nickbakht M, Meyer C, Beswick R, Scarinci N. Minimum data set for families of children with hearing loss: an eDelphi Study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022;65(4):1615-29.
58 Denman D, Kim JH, Munro N, Speyer R, Cordier R. Consensus on terminology for describing child language interventions: A delphi study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(9):3504-19.
59 Calaf N, Garcia-Quintana D. Development and validation of the bilingual catalan/spanish cross-cultural adaptation of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024;67(4):1072-89.
60 Krikheli L, Carey LB, Mathisen BA, Erickson S, Carey-Sargeant CL. Speech-language pathologists in paediatric palliative care: a Delphi study protocol. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020;10(4):e43.
61 Rowe G, Wright G, Bolger F. The Delphi Technique: a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1991;39(3):235-51.
62 Van Stan JH, Whyte J, Duffy JR, Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Doyle PB, Gherson S, et al. Rehabilitation treatment specification system: methodology to identify and describe unique targets and ingredients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(3):521-31.
63 Drumm S, Bradley C, Moriarty F. ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi Technique. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022;18(1):2230-6.
64 Brockhoff K. The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face-to-face discussion [Internet]. 2002 [citado em 2024 Jan 9]. Disponível em:
65 Haven TL, Errington TM, Gleditsch KS, van Grootel L, Jacobs AM, Kern FG, et al. Preregistering qualitative research: a Delphi study. Int J Qual Methods, 2020:19. http://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920976417.
66 Hernandez-Nieto R. Contribuciones al análisis estadístico de datos. Charleston: BookSurge Publishing; 2002.
67 Yaghmaie F. Content validity and its estimation. J Med Educ. 2003;3(1):e105015.
68 Koller I, Levenson MR, Glück J. What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Front Psychol. 2017;8:126.
69 Silveira MB, Saldanha RP, Leite JCC, Silva TOF, Silva T, Filippin LI. Construction and validation of content of one instrument to assess falls in the elderly. Einstein. 2018;16(2):1-8.
70 Filgueiras A, Galvão BO, Pires E, Fioravanti-Bastos ACM, Hora GPR, Teixeira Santana CMT, et al. Tradução e adaptação semântica do Questionário de Controle Atencional para o Contexto Brasileiro. Estud Psicol. 2015;32(2):173-85.
71 Plake BS, Wise LL, Cook LL, Drasgow F, Gong BT, Hamilton LS, et al. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
72 Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019;15(2):214-21.
73 Munaretto LF, Corrêa HL, Carneiro da Cunha JA. Um estudo sobre as características do método Delphi e de grupo focal, como técnicas na obtenção de dados em pesquisas exploratórias. ReA UFSM. 2013;6(1):9-24.
74 Hamlet C, Rumsey N, Williamson H, Johnson K, Nduka C. Consensus research priorities for facial palsy: a Delphi survey of patients, carers, clinicians and researchers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(12):1777-84.
75 Correia PRB, Coêlho JF, Freire MLJ, Almeida LNA, Pernambuco LA, Alves GAS. Fotobiomodulação em fonoaudiologia: o perfil da prática profissional e o nível de informação dos fonoaudiólogos brasileiros. Rev CEFAC. 2021;23(3):e12920.
76 Tomé RFF, Silva DFB, dos Santos CAO, de Vasconcelos Neves G, Rolim AKA, de Castro Gomes DQ. ILIB (intravascular laser irradiation of blood) as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic systemic diseases: an integrative literature review. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(9):1899-907.
77 Vanin AA, Miranda EF, Machado CS, de Paiva PR, Albuquerque-Pontes GM, Casalechi HL, et al. What is the best moment to apply phototherapy when associated to a strength training program? A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial: phototherapy in association to strength training. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(8):1555-64.
78 Pinto HD, Vanin AA, Miranda EF, Tomazoni SS, Johnson DS, Albuquerque-Pontes GM, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy improves performance and accelerates recovery of high-level rugby players in field test: a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(12):3329-38.
79 Reis FA, Silva BAK, Laraia EMS, Melo RM, Silva PH, Leal-Junior EC, et al. Effects of pre-or post-exercise low-level laser therapy (830 nm) on skeletal muscle fatigue and biochemical markers of recovery in humans: double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(2):106-12.
80 Cavalcanti NR, Souza BO, Gama ACC, Medeiros AM. Efeito do programa integral de reabilitação vocal em professoras com disfonia comportamental. CoDAS. 2018;30(4):e20170182.
81 Alves VMN, Furlan RMM, Motta AR. Immediate effects of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy on muscle performance: an integrative literature review. Rev CEFAC. 2019;21(4):e12019.
82 Robijns J, Nair RG, Lodewijckx J, Arany P, Barasch A, Bjordal JM, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022. Front Oncol. 2022;12:927685.
83 Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation and Light therapy in oncology: mechanisms and positive or negative effects on cancer. In: Nair R. editor. Orofacial supportive care in cancer. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 255-86.
84 Ravera S, Bertola N, Pasquale C, Bruno S, Benedicenti S, Ferrando S, et al. 808-nm photobiomodulation affects the viability of a head and neck squamous carcinoma cellular model, acting on energy metabolism and oxidative stress production. Biomedicines. 2021;9(11):1717.
85 Bensadoun R-J, Epstein JB, Nair RG, Barasch A, Raber-Durlacher JE, Migliorati C, et al. Safety and efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy in oncology: a systematic review. Wiley Online Library. 2020;9(22):8279-300.
86 Genot-Klastersky MT, Paesmans M, Ameye L, Kayumba A, Beauvois S, Dragan T, et al. Retrospective evaluation of the safety of low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in patients with head/neck cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(7):3015-22.
87 Kreisler M, Christoffers AB, Willershausen B, d’Hoedt B. Low-level 809 nm GaAlAs laser irradiation increases the proliferation rate of human laryngeal carcinoma cells in vitro. Lasers Med Sci. 2003;18(2):100-3.
88 Deng J, Lukens JN, Swisher-McClure S, Cohn JC, Spinelli BA, Quinn RJ, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy in head and neck cancer-related lymphedema: a pilot feasibility study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2021;20:15347354211037938.
89 Pontes ES, Vaiano TG, Bastos RSA, Lopes LW. Opinion of speech-language pathologist on the use of photobiomodulation in the vocal clinic. CoDAS. 2023;35(6):e20220060.
90 Shamloo S, Defensor E, Ciari P, Ogawa G, Vidano L, Lin JS, et al. The anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation are mediated by cytokines: evidence from a mouse model of inflammation. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1150156.
91 de Souza Costa M, de Brito TV, de Oliveira SB, Souza Brauna I, Neto JCRM, Teles RHG, et al. Photobiomodulation exerts anti-inflammatory effects on the vascular and cellular phases of experimental inflammatory models. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37(1):563-71.
92 Girasol CE, de Araújo Braz G, Bachmann L, et al. Laser light sources for photobiomodulation: the role of power and beam characterization in treatment accuracy and reliability. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0266193.
93 Yadav A, Gupta A. Noninvasive red and near-infrared wavelength-induced photobiomodulation: promoting impaired cutaneous wound healing. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2017;33(1):4-13.
94 Colombo E, Signore A, Aicardi S, Zekiy A, Utyuzh A, Benedicenti S, et al. Experimental and clinical applications of red and near-infrared photobiomodulation on endothelial dysfunction: a review. Biomedicines. 2021;9(3):274.
95 Machado BCZ, Mazzetto MO, Silva MAMR, Felício CM. Effects of oral motor exercises and laser therapy on chronic temporomandibular disorders: a randomized study with follow-up. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(5):945-54.
96 Silva RMV, de Macedo LB, Pimentel MJ, de Brito Vieira WH, Brasileiro JS. Immediate effects of photobiomodulation on neuromuscular performance after muscle fatigue-induced: a randomized, clinical trial. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2017;20(5):147.
97 Aleixo-Junior IO, Leal-Junior ECP, Casalechi HL, Vanin AA, Paiva PRV, Machado CSM, et al. Immediate effects of photobiomodulation therapy combined with a static magnetic field on the subsequent performance: a preliminary randomized crossover triple-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Biomed Opt Express. 2021;12(11):6940-53.
98 Zhang Z. Mechanics of human voice production and control. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(4):2614-35.
99 Pretterklieber M. Functional anatomy of the human intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Eur Surg. 2003;35(5):250-8.
100 Sprinzl GM, Eckel HE, Sittel C, Pototschnig C, Koebke J. Morphometric measurements of the cartilaginous larynx: an anatomic correlate of laryngeal surgery. Head Neck. 1999;21(8):743-50.
101 McCullagh KL, Shah RN, Huang BY. Anatomy of the Larynx and Cervical Trachea. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2022;32(4):809-29.
102 Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Zhang Z, Chhetri DK. Hirano’s cover-body model and its unique laryngeal postures revisited. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(6):1412-8.
103 Chhetri DK, Zhang Z, Neubauer J. Measurement of Young’s Modulus of Vocal Folds by Indentation. J Voice. 2011;25(1):1-7.
104 Bacelete VSB, Gama ACC. Efeitos terapêuticos da fotobiomodulação na clínica fonoaudiológica: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev CEFAC. 2021;23(1):e9120.
105 Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Pillutla P, Zhang Z, Chhetri DK. Dynamics of intrinsic laryngeal muscle contraction. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(1):E21-5.
106 Bailey D, Goldenberg D. Surgical anatomy of the larynx. Oper Tech Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2019;30(4):232-6.
107 Wu L, Zhang Z. Impact of the paraglottic space on voice production in an MRI-Based Vocal Fold Model. J Voice. 2023;37(4):633.e15-23.
108 Máximo C, Coêlho J, Benevides S, Alves GAS. Fotobiomodulação com laser de baixa potência na função mastigatória e nos movimentos mandibulares em adultos com disfunção temporomandibular. CoDAS. 2022;34(3):e20210138.
109 Topaloglu N, Özdemir M, Çevik ZBY. Comparative analysis of the light parameters of red and near-infrared diode lasers to induce photobiomodulation on fibroblasts and keratinocytes: an in vitro study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2021;37(3):253-62.
110 Huang YY, Chen AC, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy. Dose Response. 2009;7(4):358-83.
111 Gomes CF, Schapochnik A. The therapeutic use of low-intensity laser (LLLT) in some diseases and its relation to the performance in speech therapy. Distúrb Comun. 2017;29(3):570-8.
112 Chen Z, Huang S, Liu M. The review of the light parameters and mechanisms of Photobiomodulation on melanoma cells. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022;38(1):3-11.
113 Dompe C, Moncrieff L, Matys J, Grzech-Leśniak K, Kocherova I, Bryja A, et al. Photobiomodulation-underlying mechanism and clinical applications. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1724.
114 Roy N, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Eadie T, Sivasankar MP, Mehta D, Paul D, et al. Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22(2):212-26.
115 Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: american speech-language-hearing association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):887-905.
116 Lopes LW, da Silva JD, Simões LB, Evangelista DDS, Silva POC, Almeida AA, et al. Relationship between acoustic measurements and self-evaluation in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2017;31(1):119.e1-10.
117 Behlau M, Madazio G, Moreti F, Oliveira G, Santos LM, Paulinelli BR, et al. Efficiency and cutoff values of self-assessment instruments on the impact of a voice problem. J Voice. 2016;30(4):506.e9-18.
118 Cohen SM. Self-reported impact of dysphonia in a primary care population: an epidemiological study. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(10):2022-32.
119 Abreu SR, Moraes RM, Martins PDN, Lopes LW. VoxMore: technological artifact to assist voice acoustic evaluation in the teaching-learning process and clinical practice. CoDAS. 2023;35(6):e20220166.
120 Moura LMGMO, Silva POC, Santana ÉR, Batista DJ, Duarte JMT, Ribeiro VV et al. Medidas de efeito das intervenções em vozes saudáveis: uma revisão de escopo. Audiol Commun Res. 2023;28:e2769.
121 Nowack M, Endrikat JE, Guenther E. Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(9):1603-15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.006.
Submetido em:
09/01/2024
Aceito em:
15/07/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email