Teste de palavras no ruído: confiabilidade no teste-reteste em adultos normo-ouvintes
The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults
Lidiéli Dalla Costa; Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher; Maristela Julio Costa
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.
Methods: Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.
Conclusion: The Word-withNoise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.
Keywords
Referências
1 McArdle RA, Wilson RH, Burks CA. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words and sentences. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(9):726-39, quiz 763-4.
2 Carhart R, Tillman TW. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91(3):273-9.
3 Taylor B. Speech in noise tests: how and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J. 2003;56(1):40-6.
4 Wilson RH. Adding speech-in-noise testing to your clinical protocol: why and how. Hear J. 2004;57(2):10-6.
5 Wilson RH, McArdle RA. Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4, Suppl 2):79-94.
6 Wilson RH. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(7):405-23.
7 Reynard P, Lagacé J, Joly CA, Dodelé L, Veuillet E, Thai-Van H. Speech-in-noise audiometry in adults: a review of the available tests for french speakers. Audiol Neurotol. 2022;27(3):185-99.
8 British Society of Audiology. Practice Guidance. Assessment of speech understanding in noise in adults with hearing difficulties [Internet]. West Lothian: British Society of Audiology; 2019 [citado em 2023 Jan 12]. Disponível em:
9 Joly CA, Reynard P, Mezzi K, Bakhos D, Bergeron F, Bonnard D, et al. Guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) and the French Society of Audiology (SFA) for speech-in-noise testing in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2022;139(1):21-7.
10 Costa LD, Vaucher AVA, Pagliarin KC, Costa MJ. Teste de Palavras no Ruído: desenvolvimento, validação e valores de referência. CoDAS. 2024. No prelo.
11 Vaucher AVA. Construção e validação de listas de monossílabos para a realização do índice percentual de reconhecimento de fala [tese]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; 2016.
12 Vaucher AVA, Menegotto IH, de Moraes AB, Costa MJ. Lists of monosyllables for speech audiometry testing: construct validity. Audiol Commun Res. 1729;2017(22):1-5.
13 Vaucher AVA, Dalla Costa L, de Moraes AB, Menegotto IH, Costa MJ. Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence. CoDAS. 2022;34(3):1-9.
14 Hennig TR. Teste para a pesquisa do limiar de reconhecimento de fala: desenvolvimentos e estudos psicométricos [tese]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; 2017.
15 Hennig TR, Vaucher AVA, Costa MJ. Development and validation of lists of disyllabic words for speech audiometry testing. Audiol Commun Res. 1915;2018(23):e1915.
16 Costa MJ, Iorio MCM, Albernaz PLM, Cabral EF Jr, Magni AB. Development of speech-spectrum noise. Acta Awho. 1998;17(2):84-9.
17 Pacico JC, Hutz CS, Schneider AMA, Bandeira DR. Validade. In: Hutz CS, Bandeira DR, Trentini CM. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015. p. 71-84.
18 Martins GA. Sobre confiabilidade e validade. Rev Bras Gest Neg. 2006;8(20):1-12.
19 Urbina S. Fundamentos da testagem psicológica. Porto Alegre: ArtMed; 2007.
20 Zanon C, Hauck N Fo. Fidedignidade. In: Hutz CS, Bandeira DR, Trentini CM. Psicometria. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015. p. 85-96.
21 Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113.
22 Brito GN, Brito LS, Paumgartten FJ, Lins MF. Lateral preferences in Brazilian adults: an analysis with the Edinburgh Inventory. Cortex. 1989;25(3):403-15.
23 Levitt H, Rabiner LR. Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1967;42(3):609-12.
24 Russo ICP, Momensohn-Santos TM. Logoaudiometria. In: Momensohn-Santos TM, Russo ICP. A prática da Audiologia clínica. 6. ed. São Paulo: Cortez; 2007. p. 135-54.
25 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
26 Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033-9.
27 Spyridakou C, Rosen S, Dritsakis G, Bamiou DE. Adult normative data for the speech in babble (SiB) test. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(1):33-8.
28 Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59.
29 Wilson RH, McArdle RA. Speech-in-noise measures as necessary components of routine audiologic evaluations and auditory processing disorder evaluations. In: Cacace AT, McFarland DJ. Controversies in central auditory processing disorder. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008. p. 151-68.
30 Santos TBL. Tamanho de amostra para o teste-reteste na determinação do coeficiente de correlação intraclasse [trabalho de conclusão de curso]. Uberlândia: Universidade Federal de Uberlânda; 2018.
Submetido em:
24/04/2023
Aceito em:
06/07/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email