Development and evaluation of Tamil Matrix Sentence Test Performance in young adults
Ramya Vaidyanath; Neethi Jesudass; Thaaranya Krishnamoorthy Achari
Abstract
Keywords
References
1 Egan JJ. Basic aspects of speech audiometry. Ear Nose Throat J. 1979;58(5):190-3. PMid:456296.
2 Silverman SR. Use of speech tests for evaluation of clinical procedures. Arch Otolaryngol. 1950;51(6):786-97.
3 Erber NP, Alencewicz CM. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1976;41(2):256-67.
4 Carhart R. Problems in the measurement of speech discrimination. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;82(3):253-60.
5 Carhart R. Basic principles of speech audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol. 1951;40(1-2):62-71.
6 Office of The Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India [Internet]. New Delhi: Office of The Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India; c2011 [cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:
7 Geetha C, Kumar KSS, Manjula P, Pavan M. Development and standardisation of the sentence identification test in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci. 2014;4(1):18-26.
8 Jain C, Narne VK, Singh NK, Kumar P. [Internet]. Development of sentence test for speech recognition in Hindi. Mysuru: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 2012 [cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:
9 Tanniru K, Narne VK, Jain C, Konadath S, Singh NK, Sreenivas KJR, et al. Development of equally intelligible Telugu sentence-lists to test speech recognition in noise. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(9):664-71.
10 Boominathan P [Internet]. Picture speech identification test for children in Tamil. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 1999 [cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:
11 Samuel JD [Internet]. Development and standardization of phonetically balanced test materials in Tamil language. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 1976 [cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:
12 Lehiste I, Peterson GE. The identification of filtered vowels. Phonetica. 1959;4(4):161-77.
13 Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95(2):1085-99.
14 Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102(4):2412-21.
15 Hirsh IJ, Davis H, Silverman SR, Reynolds EG, Eldert E, Benson RW. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord. 1952;17(3):321-37.
16 Kalikow DN, Stevens KN, Elliott LL. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977;61(5):1337-51.
17 Silverman SR, Hirsh IJ. CX problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1955;64(4):1234-44.
18 Houben R, Koopman J, Luts H, Wagener KC, van Wieringen A, Verschuure H, et al. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(10):760-3.
19 Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A, Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, et al. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(7):728-37.
20 Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol. 1982;11(2):79-87.
21 Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(Suppl 2):71-9.
22 Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(Suppl 2):51-61.
23 Gnanateja GN, Bhattarai B. Matrix sentence test - stimuli shuffler [Matlab File Exchange] [software]. USA: MathWorks; 2015 [cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:
24 Hudgins CV, Hawkins JE, Kaklin JE, Stevens SS. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope. 1947;57(1):57-89.
25 von Hapsburg D, Champlin CA, Shetty SR. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004;15(1):88-98.
26 Jansen S, Luts H, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B, Del Rio M, Dauman R, et al. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study. Int J Audiol. 2012;51(3):164-73.
Submitted date:
11/05/2022
Accepted date:
04/19/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email