Protocolo de avaliação para apraxia de fala adquirida
Assessment protocol for acquired apraxia of speech
Beatriz Maurer Costa; Cláudia Regina Brescancini; Karin Zazo Ortiz
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an assessment protocol for speech motor planning with phonologically balanced stimuli for Brazilian Portuguese, including all necessary variables for this diagnosis.
Methods: Three stages were carried out: In the first, word lists were built with the main criterion being syllabic and accentual patterns. From the survey conducted in Stage 1, the words that composed the first version of the protocol lists in Stage 2 were selected, and grouped into two fundamental tasks for diagnosing acquired apraxia of speech (AOS): repetition and Reading Aloud (RA). In Stage 3, the occurrence of words was investigated using the Brazilian Corpus (PUC-SP) - Linguateca database, and a statistical analysis was performed to verify if the repetition and RA lists were balanced in terms of the occurrences. Thus, the lists were distributed in quartiles and submitted to both descriptive and bivariate analyses. A significance level of 5% (p<0.05) was adopted.
Results: After completion of all stages, the words that composed the lists of the repetition and RA tasks were obtained. Finally, other tasks considered essential for the assessment of AOS, such as diadochokinetic rates and the board for spontaneous oral emission, were then added to the protocol.
Conclusion: The developed protocol contains the tasks considered standard for the assessment of AOS according to the international literature, which makes this instrument important for diagnosing this disorder in speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
Keywords
Referências
1 Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Motor speech disorders. 1st ed. Philadelphía: W. B. Saunders; 1975.
2 McNeil MR, Pratt SR, Fossett TRD. The differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. In: Maassen B, Kent R, Peters H, van Lieshout P, Hulstijn W, editors. Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 389-412.
3 Ballard KJ, Azizi L, Duffy JR, McNeil MR, Halaki M, O’Dwyer N, et al. A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech. Neuropsychologia. 2016;81:129-39.
4 Van Der Merwe A. New perspectives on speech motor planning and programming in the context of the four-level model and its implication for understanding the pathophysiology underlying apraxia of speech and other motor speech disorders. Aphasiology. 2020;32(1):88-102.
5 Haley KL, Jacks A, Richardson JD, Wambaugh JL. Perceptually salient sound distortions and apraxia of speech: a performance continuum. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2S):631-40.
6 Cera ML, Ortiz KZ, Bertolucci PHF, Minett T. Phonetic and phonological aspects of speech in Alzheimer’s disease. Aphasiology. 2018;32(1):88-102.
7 Dabul B. Apraxia battery for adults. Austin: PRO-ED; 2000.
8 Strand EA, Duffy JR, Clark HM, Josephs K. The apraxia of speech rating scale: A tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech. J Commun Disord. 2014;51:43-50.
9 Haley KL, Jacks A, de Riesthal M, Abou-Khalil R, Roth HL. Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55(5):S1502-17.
10 Haley KL, Jacks A. Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(5):479-95.
11 Martins FC, Ortiz KZ. Proposta de protocolo para avaliação da apraxia da fala. Fono Atual. 2004;30:53-61.
12 Molloy J, Jagoe C. Use of diverse diagnostic criteria for acquired apraxia of speech: a scoping review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(6):875-93.
13 Basilakos A, Yourganov G, den Ouden DB, Fogerty D, Rorden C, Feenaughty L, et al. A multivariate analytic approach to the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60(12):3378-92.
14 Bislick L, Hula WD. Perceptual characteristics of consonant production in apraxia of speech and aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(4):1411-31.
15 Bartle CJ, Goozée J, Murdoch B. An EMA analysis of the effect of increasing word length on consonant production in apraxia of speech: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21(3):189-210.
Submetido em:
01/10/2022
Aceito em:
20/03/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email