CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022245pt
CoDAS
Original Article

Desempenho de pré-escolares e escolares no protocolo ProNOH: aspectos macroestruturais

Performance of preschool and schoolchildren on the ProNOH protocol: macrostructure aspects

Natalia Freitas Rossi; Ana Carolina Xavier; Kriscia Gobi Rosa; Célia Maria Giacheti

Downloads: 0
Views: 321

Resumo

RESUMO: Objetivo: Investigar se o escore narrativo obtido por meio da aplicação do “Protocolo de Avaliação da Narrativa Oral de História (ProNOH)” permite discriminar os grupos etários estudados, bem como sua relação com o nível de coerência global da história.

Método: Participaram 97 pré-escolares e escolares com desenvolvimento típico de linguagem, entre 5 e 12 anos, ambos os sexos que frequentavam escola pública. Foi aplicado o “Protocolo de Avaliação da Narrativa Oral de História (ProNOH)” e calculado o escore narrativo na dimensão macroestrutural a partir dos elementos estruturais previstos no modelo da gramática de história. Esses mesmos elementos foram usados para obter o nível de coerência global da história, segundo proposta de análise de Spinillo e Martins (1997).

Resultados: Diferença estatisticamente significante foi encontrada entre os grupos etários, principalmente entre as idades fronteiriças de 5-6 anos, 7-8 anos, 9-10 anos e 11-12 anos. Correlação positiva e estatisticamente significante foi encontrada com a idade e o escore narrativo e a coerência global, bem como entre o escore narrativo e o nível de coerência global.

Conclusão: O protocolo mostrou ser útil para identificar o repertório de elementos típicos da gramática de história na narrativa oral como uma medida objetiva que diferenciou a narrativa oral de grupos etários. Os resultados indicaram ainda que o escore narrativo pode ser uma medida norteadora do nível de coerência da história, apesar deste valor não substituir uma análise específica.

Palavras-chave

Narração, Linguagem, Desenvolvimento Infantil, Testes de Linguagem, Estudantes

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate if the narrative score of the ProNOH protocol allows for discriminating age groups, as well as its relation with the global coherence level of the story. The performance of preschool and schoolchildren on the macrostructure aspects.

Methods: Participants were 97 preschoolers and schoolchildren with typical language development, aged between five and 12 years old, and both sexes who attended public schools. The “Protocolo de Avaliação da Narrativa Oral de História (ProNOH)” (Protocol for the Evaluation of Oral Storytelling) was applied and the narrative score in the macrostructure dimension was calculated with story grammar elements. These same story elements were used to obtain the global coherence level of the story, as proposed by Spinillo and Martins (1997).

Results: A statistically significant difference was found between age groups, mainly between the borderline ages of 5-6 years, 7-8 years, 9-10 years, and 11-12 years. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between the narrative score and global coherence and age, as well as between the narrative score and global coherence.

Conclusion: The protocol proved to be useful for identifying the repertoire of typical story grammar elements as an objective measure that differs in oral narrative across age groups. The results also indicate that the narrative score can provide an idea about the global coherence of the story, although this value does not replace a specific analysis.

Keywords

Narration; Language; Child Development; Language Tests; Students

Referencias

1 Hughes DL, McGillivray L, Schmidek M. Guide to narrative language: procedures for assessment. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking; 1997.

2 Gillam RB, Pearson NA. TNL: Test of Narrative Language. Austin: Pro-ed; 2004.

3 Justice LM, Bowles RP, Kaderavek JN, Ukrainetz TA, Eisenberg SL, Gillam RB. The index of narrative microstructure: a clinical tool for analyzing school-age children’s narrative performances. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;15(2):177-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/017). PMid:16782689.

4 Petersen D, Gillam S, Gillam R. Emerging procedures in narrative assessment: the index of narrative complexity. Top Lang Disord. 2008;28(2):115-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000318933.46925.86.

5 Gillam SL, Olszewski A, Squires K, Wolfe K, Slocum T, Gillam RB. Improving narrative production in children with language disorders: an early-stage efficacy study of a narrative intervention program. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018;49(2):197-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0047. PMid:29621800.

6 Pauls LJ, Archibald LMD. Cognitive and linguistic effects of narrative-based language intervention in children with Developmental Language Disorder. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2021;6:23969415211015867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415211015867. PMid:36381534.

7 Favot K, Carter M, Stephenson J. The effects of oral narrative intervention on the narratives of children with language disorder: a systematic literature review. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2021;33(4):489-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09763-9.

8 Zenaro MP, Rossi NF, Souza ALDM, Giacheti CM. Estrutura e coerência da narrativa oral de crianças com transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade. CoDAS. 2019;31(6):e20180197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018197. PMid:31778423.

9 Jepsen IB, Hougaard E, Matthiesen ST, Lambek R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of narrative language abilities in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022;50(6):737-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-021-00871-4. PMid:34807333.

10 Fisher EL, Barton-Hulsey A, Walters C, Sevcik RA, Morris R. Executive functioning and narrative language in children with dyslexia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(3):1127-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0106. PMid:31200604.

11 Vretudaki H. ‘Tell me the whole story’: moving from narrative comprehension to narrative production skills. Eur Early Child Educ Res J. 2022;30(6):949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2098991.

12 Mäkinen L, Loukusa S, Nieminen L, Leinonen E, Kunnari S. The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, referential cohesion and event content in four-to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Lang. 2014;34(1):24-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0142723713511000.

13 Mayer M. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press; 1969.

14 Berman RA, Slobin DI, editores. Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. New York: Psychology Press; 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203773512.

15 Reilly J, Losh M, Bellugi U, Wulfeck B. “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain Lang. 2004;88(2):229-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00101-9. PMid:14965544.

16 Souza MSL, Cáceres-Assenço AM. O vocabulário e as habilidades narrativas se correlacionam em pré-escolares com desenvolvimento típico de linguagem? CoDAS. 2021;33(6):e20200169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020169.

17 Reilly JS, Bates EA, Marchman VA. Narrative discourse in children with early focal brain injury. Brain Lang. 1998;61(3):335-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1882. PMid:9570869.

18 Coggins TE, Friet T, Morgan T. Analysing narrative productions in older school-age children and adolescents with fetal alcohol syndrome: an experimental tool for clinical applications. Clin Linguist Phon. 1998;12(3):221-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985223.

19 Rossi NF, Rosa KG, Giacheti CM. A narrativa oral de história no contexto da avaliação da linguagem: proposta de protocolo dos aspectos macro e microestruturais. In: Giacheti CM, editor. Avaliação da fala e da linguagem: perspectivas interdisciplinares em Fonoaudiologia. Marília: Oficina Universitária; 2020. p. 273. http://dx.doi.org/10.36311/2020.978-65-86546-87-3.p273-292.

20 Gardner-Nebletti N. What predicts oral narrative competence among African American children? Exploring the role of linguistic and cognitive skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022;65(8):2931-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00002. PMid:35914022.

21 Spinillo AG, Martins RA. Uma análise da produção de histórias coerentes por crianças. Psicol Reflex Crit. 1997;10(2):219-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79721997000200004.

22 Dadalto EV, Goldfeld M. Características comuns à narrativa oral de crianças na pré-alfabetização. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(1):42-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009005000013.

23 Westby, C. 21st century literacy for a diverse world. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004;56(4):254-71.

24 Forman H. Events and children’s sense of time: a perspective on the origins of everyday time-keeping. Front Psychol. 2015;6:259. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00259. PMid:25814969.

25 Cohn N. Visual narrative comprehension: universal or not? Psychon Bull Rev. 2020;27(2):266-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01670-1. PMid:31820277.

26 Lindgren J. Comprehension and production of narrative macrostructure in Swedish: A longitudinal study from age 4 to 7. First Lang. 2019;39(4):412-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0142723719844089.

27 Ralli AM, Kazali E, Kanellou M, Mouzaki A, Antoniou F, Diamanti V, et al. Oral language and story retelling during preschool and primary school years: developmental patterns and interrelationships. J Psycholinguist Res. 2021;50(5):949-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09758-3. PMid:33515178.

28 Adlof SM, McLeod AN, Leftwich B. Structured narrative retell instruction for young children from low socioeconomic backgrounds: a preliminary study of feasibility. Front Psychol. 2014;5:391. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00391. PMid:24847295.

29 Gonçalves F, Dias MGBB. Coerência textual: um estudo com jovens e adultos. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2003;16(1):29-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722003000100005.

30 Pessoa APP, Correa J, Spinillo A. Contexto de produção e o estabelecimento da coerência na escrita de histórias por crianças. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2010;23(2):253-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722010000200007.
 


Submitted date:
06/10/2022

Accepted date:
03/03/2023

66577420a953955f037e9e45 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections