Instrumento multiprofissional de rastreio para risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalar à população idosa: evidências de validade baseada nos processos de resposta
Multi-professional screening instrument for risk of broncho-aspiration in a hospital environment for the elderly population: validity evidence based on response processes
Paloma Alves Miquilussi; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Giselle Aparecida de Athayde Massi
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to validate the Multiprofessional Screening Instrument for Broncho-aspiration Risk in Hospital Environment, which is aimed at the elderly population, based on response processes.
Methods: Judges applied the instrument to different patients and randomly selected. After the application, the judges were interviewed so that it was possible to verify their impression regarding the relevance of the items about their interpretation of the written content, as well as grammatical and semantic issues. Suggestions for adding alternative questions and answers were considered, as well as proposals for adapting the questions that made up the instrument. Non-verbal reactions, such as facial expressions that suggested doubts or hesitations, by the judges concerning the instrument were also analyzed.
Results: The agreement of the judges concerning each item of the device was calculated by the Content Validity Index (CVI) and by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and their results showed a high level of agreement. Through the suggestions of the judges, a new version of the Multi-professional Screening Instrument for the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in a Hospital Environment in the Elderly was elaborated.
Conclusion: The results obtained showed that the validity of the Multi-professional Instrument for Screening the Risk of Broncho-aspiration in the Hospital Environment with the elderly population, based on the response processes, was achieved and makes it a promising device to assist professionals in hospital care for the elderly.
Keywords
Referências
1 Dudik JM, Kurosu A, Coyle JL, Sejdić E. Dysphagia and its effects on Swallowing sounds and vibrations in adults. Biomed Eng Online. 2018;17(1):69.
2 Carmo LFS, Santos FAA, Mendonça SCB, Araújo BCL. Management of the risk of bronchoaspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Rev CEFAC. 2018;20(4):532-40.
3 Magalhães HV Jr. Evidências de validade do Questionário autorreferido para rastreamento de disfagia orofaríngea em idosos – RaDI [tese]. Natal: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; 2018. p. 21, 31, 32, 115.
4 American Educational Research Association. American Psychology Association. National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. New York: AERA; 1999.
5 Azevedo SB, Lima MLLT, Griz SMS, Leal LP. Instrument for evaluating child hearing health services: construction and validity. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03357. PMid:30328981.
6 Sartori APA, Coltro PH, Boumer T, Zanata I, Santos RS. Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment. Res Soc Dev. 2022;11(1):e27111124847.
7 Souza LF, Batista REA, Camapanharo CRV, Costa PCP, Lopes MCBT, Okuno MFP. Factors associated with risk, perception and knowledge of falls in elderly people. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2022;43:e20200335.
8 Almeida TM, Cola PC, Pernambuco LA, Magalhães Júnior HV, Magnoni CD, Silva RG. Screening tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in Stroke - Part I: evidence of validity based on the content and response processes. CoDAS. 2017;29(4):e20170009.
9 Miot HA. Agreement analysis in clinical and experimental trials. J Vasc Bras. 2016;15(2):89-92.
10 Lee KM, Lee J, Chung CY, Ahn S, Sung KH, Kim TW, et al. Pitfalls and important issues in testing reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients in orthopaedic research. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):149-55.
11 Pasquali L. Principles of elaboration of psychological scales. Arch Clin Psychiatry. 1998;25(5):206-13.
12 Costa CMM, Chagas HMA, Matsukura TS, Vieira GI, Marqueze EC, Lopes CG, et al. Contributions of a graduate program in the health field for professional education: experience report. Saude Soc. 2014;23(4):1471-81.
13 Presotto M, Rieder CRM, Olchik MR. Validation of Content and Reliability of the Protocol for the Evaluation of Acquired Speech Disorders in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease (PADAF). CoDAS. 2019;31(5):e20180230.
14 Leite SS, Áfio ACE, Carvalho LV, Silva JM, Almeida PC, Pagliuca LMF. Construction and validation of an educational content validation instrument in health. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(Suppl 4):1635-41.
15 Lima MS, Sassi FC, Medeiros GC, Jayanthi SK, Andrade CRF. Diagnostic precision for bronchopulmonary aspiration in a heterogeneous population. CoDAS. 2020;32(5):e20190166.
16 Ferrucci JL, Sassi FC, Medeiros GC, Andrade CRF. Comparison between the functional aspects of swallowing and clinical markers in ICU patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). CoDAS. 2019;31(2):e20170278.
17 Apolinário D, Yamaguti STF, Dutra AF, Lara SEM, Coli RCP, Weber B. Safe Hospital Program for the Elderly Person: an observational study on the impact in reducing functional decline. Cad Saude Publica. 2022;38(2):e00305620.
18 Medeiros GC, Sassi FC, Andrade CRF. Use of silicone bracelet to signal risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital setting. Audiol Commun Res. 2019;24:e2258.
Submetido em:
11/09/2022
Aceito em:
15/02/2023
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email