CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241en
CoDAS
Revisão Crítica ou Revisão de Escopo

Reducing the gap between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part B: traditional vocal therapy techniques and modern electrostimulation and photobiomodulation techniques applied to vocal rehabilitation

Reduzindo o gap entre a ciência e a clínica: lições da academia e da prática profissional – parte B: técnicas tradicionais de terapia vocal e técnicas modernas de eletroestimulação e fotobiomodulação aplicadas à reabilitação vocal

Mara Behlau; Anna Alice Almeida; Geová Amorim; Patrícia Balata; Sávio Bastos; Mauriceia Cassol; Ana Carolina Constantini; Claudia Eckley; Marina Englert; Ana Cristina Cortes Gama; Ingrid Gielow; Bruno Guimarães; Livia Ribeiro Lima; Leonardo Lopes; Glaucya Madazio; Felipe Moreti; Vanessa Mouffron; Katia Nemr; Priscila Oliveira; Marina Padovani; Vanessa Veis Ribeiro; Kelly Silverio; Thays Vaiano; Rosiane Yamasaki

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241en CoDAS, vol.34, n5, e20210241, 2022
PDF English
PDF Português
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 8
Views: 6273

Abstract

This text is the continuation of the XVIII SBFa Congress publication. In part “A” we presented the analyses on clinical vocal evaluation. Part “B” focuses on vocal rehabilitation: 4. Traditional techniques of vocal therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation applied to vocal rehabilitation. The numerous studies on the various programs, methods, and techniques of traditional rehabilitation techniques, and many with high quality of evidence, allow us to consider such procedures relatively well described, safe, and with known effects, accounting for the treatment of various vocal disorders. The scientific evidence with traditional techniques is recognized worldwide. New fronts of evolution, with electrostimulation or photobiomodulation used to handle voice problems, seem to be promising as coadjutant approaches. There are more studies on electrostimulation in vocal rehabilitation than with photobiomodulation; however, scientific evidence for these two modern techniques is still limited. Knowledge and caution are required for the application of either technique.

Keywords

Voice; Voice Disorder; Voice Training; Therapy; Vocal Rehabilitation

Resumo

O presente texto é a continuação da publicação referente ao XVIII Congresso da SBFa. Na parte “A” apresentamos análises sobre avaliação clínica vocal. O foco da parte “B” são aspectos de reabilitação vocal: 4. Técnicas tradicionais de terapia vocal; 5. Técnicas modernas de eletroestimulação e fotobiomodulação aplicadas à reabilitação. Os inúmeros estudos sobre os diversos programas, métodos ou técnicas tradicionais de reabilitação, muitos de elevada qualidade de evidência, permitem considerar tais procedimentos relativamente bem descritos, seguros e com efeitos conhecidos, dando conta do tratamento de diversos distúrbios vocais. As evidências científicas com as técnicas tradicionais são reconhecidas mundialmente. Novas frentes de evolução, como o uso da eletroestimulação ou fotobiomodulação em voz parecem ser promissoras como abordagens coadjuvantes. Há mais estudos sobre eletroestimulação em voz do que com fotobiomodulação, contudo, evidências científicas para essas duas técnicas modernas são ainda limitadas. Conhecimento e cautela são necessários para a aplicação de quaisquer técnicas.

Palavras-chave

Voz; Distúrbio da Voz; Treinamento da Voz; Fonoterapia; Reabilitação Vocal

Referências

  1. Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M, et al. Reduzindo o gap entre a ciência e a clínica: lições da academia e da prática profissional – parte A. CoDAS. 2021. In press.
  2. Behlau M. The 2016 G. Paul Moore lecture: lessons in voice rehabilitation. J Voice. 2019;33(5):669-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.020 PMid:29567050.
  3. Froeschels E. Chewing method as therapy; a discussion with some philosophical conclusions. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1952;56(4):427-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1952.00710020449010 PMid:12984933.
  4. Froeschels E, Kastein S, Weiss DA. A method of therapy for paralytic conditions of the mechanisms of phonation, respiration and glutination. J Speech Hear Disord. 1955;20(4):365-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2004.365 PMid:13272231.
  5. Bos-Clark M, Carding P. Effectiveness of voice therapy in functional dysphonia: where are we now? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;19(3):160-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283448f85 PMid:21330925.
  6. Behlau M, Carroll L. Vocal rehabilitation or voice therapy at Journal of Voice: a 30-year analysis on publications. J Voice. [Internet]. 2022 [citado em 2021 Ago 20]. Disponível em: https://www.jvoice.org/content/ymvj-voice-rehabilitation-and-voice-therapy
  7. Timbie JW, Fox DS, Van Busum K, Schneider EC. Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice. Health Aff. 2012;31(10):2168-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0150 PMid:23048092.
  8. Murad MH. Clinical practice guidelines: a primer on development and dissemination. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(3):423-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.001 PMid:28259229.
  9. Ramig LO, Countryman S, Thompson LL, Horii Y. Comparison of two forms of intensive speech treatment for Parkinson disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1995;38(6):1232-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3806.1232 PMid:8747817.
  10. Ramig LO, Countryman S, O’Brien C, Hoehn M, Thompson L. Intensive speech treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease: short-and long-term comparison of two techniques. Neurology. 1996;47(6):1496-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.47.6.1496 PMid:8960734.
  11. Ramig LO, Sapir S, Fox C, Countryman S. Changes in vocal loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a comparison with untreated patients and normal age matched controls. Mov Disord. 2001;16(1):79-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<79::AID-MDS1013>3.0.CO;2-H PMid:11215597.
  12. Yuan F, Guo X, Wei X, Xie F, Zheng J, Huang Y, et al. Lee Silverman voice treatment for dysarthria in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(10):1957-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.14399 PMid:32539227.
  13. Ramig L, Halpern A, Spielman J, Fox C, Freeman K. Speech treatment in Parkinson’s disease: randomized controlled trial (RCT). Mov Disord. 2018;33(11):1777-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.27460 PMid:30264896.
  14. Constantinescu G, Theodoros D, Russell T, Ward E, Wilson S, Wootton R. Treating disordered speech and voice in Parkinson’s disease online: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(1):1-16. PMid:21281410.
  15. Theodoros DG, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Clinical and quality of life outcomes of speech treatment for Parkinson’s disease delivered to the home via telerehabilitation: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25(2):214-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0005 PMid:27145396.
  16. Sackley CM, Smith CH, Rick CE, Brady MC, Ives N, Patel S, et al. Lee Silverman voice treatment versus standard speech and language therapy versus control in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial (PD COMM pilot). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0222-z PMid:29344405.
  17. Saffarian A, Shavaki YA, Shahidi GA, Hadavi S, Jafari Z. Lee Silverman voice treatment (LSVT) mitigates voice difficulties in mild Parkinson’s disease. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33(1):23-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.33.5 PMid:31086784.
  18. Stemple JC, Lee L, D’Amico B, Pickup B. Efficacy of vocal function exercises as a method of improving voice production. J Voice. 1994;8(3):271-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80299-1 PMid:7987430.
  19. Angadi V, Croake D, Stemple J. Effects of vocal function exercises: a systematic review. J Voice. 2019;33(1):124.E13-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.031 PMid:29108674.
  20. Roy N, Gray SD, Simon M, Dove H, Corbin-Lewis K, Stemple JC. An evaluation of the effects of two treatment approaches for teachers with voice disorders: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44(2):286-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/023) PMid:11324651.
  21. Pasa G, Oates J, Dacakis G. The relative effectiveness of vocal hygiene training and vocal function exercises in preventing voice disorders in primary school teachers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007;32(3):128-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14015430701207774 PMid:17852714.
  22. Nguyen DD, Kenny DT. Randomized controlled trial of vocal function exercises on muscle tension dysphonia in Vietnamese female teachers. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(2):261-78. PMid:19442378.
  23. Ziegler A, Abbott KV, Johns M, Klein A, Hapner ER. Preliminary data on two voice therapy interventions in the treatment of presbyphonia. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(8):1869-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.24548 PMid:24375313.
  24. Teixeira LC, Behlau M. Comparison between vocal function exercises and voice amplification. J Voice. 2015;29(6):718-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.12.012 PMid:26296853.
  25. Kapsner-Smith MR, Hunter EJ, Kirkham K, Cox K, Titze IR. A randomized controlled trial of two semi-occluded vocal tract voice therapy protocols. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(3):535-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0231 PMid:25675335.
  26. Pedrosa V, Pontes A, Pontes P, Behlau M, Peccin SM. The effectiveness of the comprehensive voice rehabilitation program compared with the vocal function exercises method in behavioral dysphonia: a randomized clinical trial. J Voice. 2016;30(3):377.e11-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.013 PMid:25959424.
  27. Verdolini-Marston K, Burke MK, Lessac A, Glaze L, Caldwell E. Preliminary study of two methods of treatment for laryngeal nodules. J Voice. 1995;9(1):74-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80225-5 PMid:7757153.
  28. Verdolini K. Case study: resonant voice therapy. In: Stemple JC, editor. Voice therapy: clinical studies. San Diego: Singular/Thomson Learning; 2000. p. 46-62.
  29. Stemple JC, Glaze LE, Gerdeman BK, Klaben B. Clinical voice pathology: theory and management. 3rd ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000.
  30. Boone DR, McFarlane SC, Von Berg S. The voice and voice therapy. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2005.
  31. Behlau M, Madazio G, Feijó D, Azevedo R, Gielow I, Rehder MI. Aperfeiçoamento vocal e tratamento fonoaudiológico nas disfonias. In: Behlau M., editor. Voz: o livro do especialista. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2005. p. 432-59. Vol. 2.
  32. Barrichelo VM, Behlau M. Perceptual identification and acoustic measures of the resonant voice based on “Lessac’s Y-Buzz”: a preliminary study with actors. J Voice. 2007;21(1):46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.014 PMid:16458480.
  33. Roy N, Weinrich B, Gray SD, Tanner K, Stemple JC, Sapienza CM. Three treatments for teachers with voice disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46(3):670-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/053) PMid:14696994.
  34. Yiu EML, Lo MCM, Barrett EA. A systematic review of resonant voice therapy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(1):17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2016.1226953 PMid:27705008.
  35. Behlau M, Pontes P, Vieira VP, Yamasaki R, Madazio G. Presentation of the Comprehensive Vocal Rehabilitation Program for the treatment of behavioral dysphonia. CoDAS. 2013;25(5):492-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000500015 PMid:24408556.
  36. Kotby MN, El-Sady R, Basiouny SE, Abou-Rass YA, Hegazi MA. Efficacy of the accent method of voice therapy. J Voice. 1991;5(4):316-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80062-1
  37. Bassiouny S. Efficacy of the accent method of voice therapy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50(3):146-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000021458 PMid:9691529.
  38. Godoy J, Silverio K, Brasolotto A. Effectiveness of vocal therapy for the elderly when applying conventional and intensive approaches: a randomized clinical trial. J Voice. 2019;33(5):809.e19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.017 PMid:29793876.
  39. Lucchini E, Maccarini AR, Bissoni E, Borragan M, Agudo M, González MJ, et al. Voice improvement in patients with functional dysphonia treated with the Proprioceptive-Elastic (PROEL) method. J Voice. 2018;32(2):209-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.018 PMid:28732751.
  40. Fantini M, Gallia M, Borrelli G, Pizzorni N, Maccarini AR, Torre AB, et al. Substitution voice rehabilitation after open partial horizontal laryngectomy through the Proprioceptive Elastic Method (PROEL): a preliminary study. J Voice. 2022;36(2):291.e1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.025 PMid:32553498.
  41. Roy N, Bless DM, Heisey D, Ford CN. Manual circumlaryngeal therapy for functional dysphonia: an evaluation of short- and long-term treatment outcomes. J Voice. 1997;11(3):321-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80011-2 PMid:9297677.
  42. Mathieson L, Hirani SP, Epstein R, Baken RJ, Wood G, Rubin JS. Laryngeal manual therapy: a preliminary study to examine its treatment effects in the management of muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2009;23(3):353-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.002 PMid:18036777.
  43. Ribeiro VV, Pedrosa V, Silverio KC, Behlau M. Laryngeal manual therapies for behavioral dysphonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. 2018;32(5):553-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.019 PMid:28844806.
  44. Anhaia TC, Klahr PS, Ourique AAB, Gadenz CD, Fernandes RA, Spagnol PE, et al. Effects of two interventions in teachers with voice complaints. Audiol Commun Res. 2014;19(2):186-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312014000200014
  45. Silverio KCA, Brasolotto AG, Siqueira LTD, Carneiro CG, Fukushiro AP, Guirro RRJ. Effect of application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and laryngeal manual therapy in dysphonic women: clinical trial. J Voice. 2015;29(2):200-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.003 PMid:25439510.
  46. Van Lierde KM, Bodt M, Dhaeseleer E, Wuyts F, Claeys S. The treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a comparison of two treatment techniques by means of an objective multiparameter approach. J Voice. 2010;24(3):294-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.09.003 PMid:19497709.
  47. Reimann AP, Siqueira LT, Rondon AV, Brasolotto AG, Silverio KC. Immediate effect of laryngeal manual therapy in dysphonic individuals. CoDAS. 2016;28(1):59-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015089 PMid:27074191.
  48. Mendes ALF, Carmo RD, Araújo AMGD, Paranhos LR, Mota CSO, Schneiberg S, et al. The effect of phonation into glass, plastic and LaxVox® tubes in singers: a systematic review. J Voice. 2019;33(3):381e1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.12.005 PMid:29731378.
  49. Gaskill CS, Quinney DM. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices. J Voice. 2012;26(3):e79-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.03.003 PMid:21550779.
  50. Guzman M, Castro C, Testart A, Munoz D, Gerhard J. Laryngeal and pharyngeal activity during semioccluded vocal tract postures in subjects diagnosed with hyperfunctional dysphonia. J Voice. 2013;27(6):709-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.05.007 PMid:24075912.
  51. Guzman M, Laukkanen AM, Krupa P, Horáček J, Švec JG, Geneid A. Vocal tract and glottal function during and after vocal exercising with resonance tube and straw. J Voice. 2013;27(4):523.e19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.007 PMid:23683806.
  52. Enflo L, Sundberg J, Romedahl C, McAllister A. Effects on vocal fold collision and phonation threshold pressure of resonance tube phonation with tube end in water. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(5):1530-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0040) PMid:23838993.
  53. Maxfield L, Titze I, Hunter E, Kapsner-Smith M. Intraoral pressures produced by thirteen semi-occluded vocal tract gestures. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40(2):86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2014.913074 PMid:24865621.
  54. Fadel CBX, Dassie-Leite AP, Santos RS, Santos CG Jr, Dias CAS, Sartori DJ. Immediate effects of the semi-occluded vocal tract exercise with LaxVox® tube in singers. CoDAS. 2016;28(5):618-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015168 PMid:27849247.
  55. Portillo MP, Rojas S, Guzman M, Quezada C. Comparison of effects produced by physiological versus traditional vocal warm-up in contemporary commercial music singers. J Voice. 2018;32(2):200-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.022 PMid:28579159.
  56. Costa CB, Costa LHC, Oliveira G, Behlau M. Immediate effects of the phonation into a straw exercise. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(4):461-5. PMid:21860972.
  57. Paes SM, Zambon F, Yamasaki R, Simberg S, Behlau M. Immediate effects of the finnish resonance tube method on behavioral dysphonia. J Voice. 2013;27(6):717-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.04.007 PMid:24119641.
  58. Andrade PA, Wood G, Ratcliffe P, Epstein R, Pijper A, Svec JA. Electroglottographic study of seven semi-occluded exercises: LaxVox®, straw, lip-trill, tongue-trill, humming, hand-over-mouth, and tongue-trill combined with hand-over-mouth. J Voice. 2014;28(5):589-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.004 PMid:24560003.
  59. Granqvist S, Simberg S, Hertegard S, Holmqvist S, Larsson H, Lindestad P, et al. Resonance tube phonation in water: high-speed imaging, electroglottographic and oral pressure observations of vocal fold vibrations - a pilot study. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015;40(3):113-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2014.913682 PMid:24865620.
  60. Guzman M, Calvache C, Romero L, Muñoz D, Olavarria C, Madrid S, et al. Do different semi-occluded voice exercises affect vocal fold adduction differently in subjects diagnosed with hyperfunctional dysphonia? Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(2):68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000437353 PMid:26394210.
  61. Guzman M, Acuña G, Pacheco F, Peralta F, Romero C, Vergara C, et al. The impact of double source of vibration semi occluded voice exercises on objective and subjective outcomes in subjects with voice complaints. J Voice. 2018;32(6):770.e1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.021 PMid:29273232.
  62. Meerschman I, Van Lierde K, Ketels J, Coppieters C, Claeys S, D’haeseleer E. Effect of three semi-occluded vocal tract therapy programmes on the phonation of patients with dysphonia: lip trill, water-resistance therapy and straw phonation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(1):50-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12431 PMid:30408272.
  63. Guzman M, Jara R, Olavarria C, Caceres P, Escuti G, Medina F, et al. Efficacy of water resistance therapy in subjects diagnosed with behavioral dysphonia: a randomized controlled trial. J Voice. 2017;31(3):385.e1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.005 PMid:27769697.
  64. Cielo CA, Lima JPM, Christmann MK. Comparison of effects of finger kazoo and tube phonation techniques in women with normal voice. Audiol Commun Res. 2016;21:e1554.
  65. Christmann MK, Cielo CA, Scapini F, Lima JPM, Gonçalves BFT, Bastilha GR. Controlled and randomized clinical trial of intensive short-term voice therapy with finger kazzo technique in teachers. Audiol Commun Res. 2017;22:e1791.
  66. Bodt MS, Ketelslagers K, Peeters T, Wuyts FL, Mertens F, Pattyn J, et al. Evolution of vocal fold nodules from childhood to adolescence. J Voice. 2007;21(2):151-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.11.006 PMid:16504470.
  67. Guimarães BTL. Uso da eletroestimulação nervosa transcutânea na fonoterapia da disfonia espástica em adução (relato de um caso). RECCS. 1993;7:53-7.
  68. Guirro RRJ, Bigaton DR, Silvério KCA, Berni KCS, Distéfano G, Santos FL, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in dysphonic women. Pro Fono. 2008;20(3):189-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872008000300009 PMid:18852967.
  69. Siqueira LTD, Silverio KCA, Brasolotto AG, Guirro RRJ, Carneiro CG, Behlau M. Effects of laryngeal manual therapy (LMT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in vocal folds diadochokinesis of dysphonic women: a randomized clinical trial. CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20160191. PMid:28538831.
  70. Conde MCM, Siqueira LTD, Vendramini JE, Brasolotto AG, Guirro RRJ, Silverio KCA. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Laryngeal Manual Therapy (LMT): immediate effects in women with dysphonia. J Voice. 2018;32(3):385.e17-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.019 PMid:28533075.
  71. Siqueira LTD, Ribeiro VV, Moreira PAM, Brasolotto AG, Guirro RRJ, Silverio KCA. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) associated with vocal therapy on musculoskeletal pain of women with behavioral dysphonia: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Commun Disord. 2019;82: 105923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105923 PMid:31382210.
  72. Mansuri B, Torabinezhad F, Jamshidi AA, Dabirmoghadam P, Vasaghi-Gharamaleki B, Ghelichi L. Application of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in muscle tension dysphonia patients with the pain complaint: the immediate effect. J Voice. 2020;34(5):657-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.02.009 PMid:31078355.
  73. Guimarães BTL. Relaxamento laríngeo com o uso da eletroestimulação nervosa transcutânea (TENS): um estudo comparativo. Rev Fonoaudiol Brasil. 2001;1:20-28.
  74. Santos JK, Silvério KC, Oliveira NFD, Gama AC. Evaluation of electrostimulation effect in women with vocal nodules. J Voice. 2016;30(6):769.e1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.023 PMid:26822388.
  75. Fabron EMG, Petrini AS, Cardoso VM, Batista JCT, Motonaga SM, Marino VCC. Immediate effects of tongue trills associated with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20150311. PMid:28614457.
  76. Mansuri B, Torabinezhad F, Jamshidi AA, Dabirmoghadam P, Vasaghi-Gharamaleki B, Ghelichi L. Application of highfrequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in muscle tension dysphonia patients with the pain complaint: the immediate effect. J Voice. 2020;34(5):657-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.02.009 PMid:31078355.
  77. Almeida ANS, Cunha DA, Duarte BF, Guimarães BTL, Lucena JA, Pernambuco LA, et al. Effect of vocal therapy associated with TENS in women with behavioral dysphonia. J Voice. 2022;36(4):585.e27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.07.035 PMid:32863100.
  78. Almeida ANS, Cunha DA, Ferreira SLS, Guimarães BTL, Balata PMM, Silva HJ. Effect of electrical stimulation on the treatment of dysphonia: a systematic review. J Voice. 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.002 PMid:32868145.
  79. Stangherlin DA, Lemos IO, Bello JZ, Cassol MC. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in dysphonic patients: a systematic review. J Voice. 2021;35(6):876-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.03.003 PMid:32273210.
  80. Mansuri B, Torabinejhad F, Jamshidi AA, Dabirmoghaddam P, Vasaghi-Gharamaleki B, Ghelichi L. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with voice therapy in women with muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2020;34(3):490.e11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.003 PMid:30529025.
  81. Katada A, Nonaka S, Adachi M, Kunibe I, Arakawa T, Imada M, et al. Functional electrical stimulation of laryngeal adductor muscles restores mobility of vocal fold and improves voice sounds in cats with unilateral laryngeal paralysis. Neurosci Res. 2004;50(2):153-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2004.06.016 PMid:15380322.
  82. Feiner M, Gerstenberger C, Mayr W, Hortobagyi D, Gugatschka M. Exploring stimulation patterns for electrical stimulation of the larynx using surface electrodes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(11):3153-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05594-3 PMid:31414223.
  83. Gugatschka M, Feiner M, Mayr W, Groselj-Strele A, Eberhard K, Gerstenberger C. Functional electrical stimulation for presbyphonia: a prospective randomized trial laryngoscope. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(11):E662-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.28489 PMid:31910302.
  84. Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7 PMid:22045511.
  85. Freitas LF, Hamblin MR. Proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016;22(3):348-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2561201 PMid:28070154.
  86. Chavantes MC, Tomimura S. Princípios básicos da luz. In: Chavantes MC, editor. Laser em biomedicina: princípios e prática. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2008. p. 73-99.
  87. Karu T. Photobiological fundamentals of low-power laser therapy. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1987;23(10):1703-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073236
  88. Karu T, Pyatibrat L, Kalendo G. Irradiation with He-Ne laser increases ATP level in cells cultivated in vitro. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1995;27(3):219-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(94)07078-3 PMid:7769534.
  89. Meneguzzo DT, Ribeiro MS, Núñez SC. Terapia laser de baixa potência na inflamação. In: Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Núñez SC, editores. Laser de baixa potência – princípios básicos e aplicações clínicas na odontologia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2012. p. 155-67.
  90. Hashmi JT, Huang Y-Y, Osmani BZ, Sharma SK, Naeser MA, Hamblin MR. Role of low-level laser therapy in neurorehabilitation. PM R. 2010;2(12S):S292-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.013 PMid:21172691.
  91. Hawkins D, Houreld N, Abrahamse H. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) as an effective therapeutic modality for delayed wound healing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1056(1):486-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1352.040 PMid:16387711.
  92. Salate AC, Barbosa G, Gaspar P, Koeke PU, Parizotto NA, Benze BG, et al. Effect of In-Ga-Al-P diode laser irradiation on angiogenesis in partial ruptures of Achilles tendon in rats. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(5):470-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.470 PMid:16262576.
  93. Marchi T, Leal ECP Jr, Bortoli C, Tomazoni SS, Lopes-Martins RAB, Salvador M. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in human progressive-intensity running: effects on exercise performance, skeletal muscle status, and oxidative stress. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27(1):231-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0955-5 PMid:21739259.
  94. Leal-Junior ECP, Vanin AA, Miranda EF, Carvalho PTC, Corso S, Bjordal JM. Effect of phototherapy (low-level laser therapy and light-emitting diode therapy) on exercise performance and markers of exercise recovery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):925-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1465-4 PMid:24249354.
  95. Vanin AA, Verhagen E, Barboza SD, Costa LOP, Leal-Junior ECP. Photobiomodulation therapy for the improvement of muscular performance and reduction of muscular fatigue associated with exercise in healthy people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(1):181-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2368-6 PMid:29090398.
  96. Bjordal JM, Lopes-Martins RA, Joensen J, Couppe C, Ljunggren AE, Stergioulas A, et al. A systematic review with procedural assessments and meta-analysis of low level laser therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-75 PMid:18510742.
  97. Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RAB, Bjordal JM. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials. Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1897-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-1 PMid:19913903.
  98. Alves VMN, Furlan RMMM, Motta AR. Efeitos imediatos da fotobiomodulação com laser de baixa intensidade sobre o desempenho muscular: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev CEFAC. 2019;21(4):e12019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/201921412019
  99. Marinho RR, Matos RM, Santos JS, Ribeiro MA, Smaniotto S, Barreto EO, et al. Potentiated anti-inflammatory effect of combined 780 nm and 660 nm low level laser therapy on the experimental laryngitis. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013;121:86-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.02.012 PMid:23524249.
  100. Kagan LS, Heaton JT. The effectiveness of low-level light therapy in attenuating vocal fatigue. J Voice. 2017;31(3):384.e15-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.004 PMid:27839705.
  101. Lou Z, Zhang C, Gong T, Xue C, Scholp A, Jiang JJ. Wound-healing effects of 635-nm low-level laser therapy on primary human vocal fold epithelial cells: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2019a;34(3):547-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2628-0 PMid:30244401.
  102. Lou Z, Gong T, Kang J, Xue C, Ulmschneider C, Jiang JJ. The effects of photobiomodulation on vocal fold wound healing: in vivo and in vitro studies. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(9):532-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4641 PMid:31503536.
  103. Van Stan JH, Roy N, Awan S, Stemple J, Hillman RE. A taxonomy of voice therapy. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(2):101-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0030 PMid:25763678.
  104. Gondin J, Guette M, Jubeau M, Ballay Y, Martin A. Central and peripheral contributions to fatigue after electrostimulation training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(6):1147-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000222843.04510.ca PMid:16775557.
  105. Garanhani RM, Cardoso RJ, Capelli GMA, Ribeiro CM. Fisioterapia na paralisia facial periférica: estudo retrospectivo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(1):112-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992007000100018
  106. Sharififar S, Shuster JJ, Bishop MD. Adding electrical stimulation during standard rehabilitation after stroke to improve motor function. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(5):339-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.06.005 PMid:29958963.
  107. Gandolla M, Ferrante S, Molteni F, Guanziroli E, Frattini T, Martegani A, et al. Re-thinking the role of motor cortex: context-sensitive motor outputs? Neuroimage. 2014;91(100):366-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.011 PMid:24440530.
  108. Santos JKO, Gama ACC, Silvério KCA, Oliveira NFCD. Uso da eletroestimulação na clínica fonoaudiológica: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Rev CEFAC. 2015;17(5):1620-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201517518114
  109. Jafari N, Salehi A, Meerschman I, Izadi F, Ebadi A, Talebian S, et al. A novel Laryngeal Palpatory Scale (LPS) in patients with muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice. 2020;34(3):488.e9-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.003 PMid:30322821.
  110. Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(2):223-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y PMid:20473619.
  111. Navratil L, Kymplova J. Contraindications in noninvasive laser therapy: truth and fiction. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002;20(6):341-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/104454702320901134 PMid:12513921.
  112. Bensadoun RJ, Epstein JB, Nair RG, Barasch A, Raber-Durlacher JE, Migliorati C, et al. Safety and efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy in oncology: a systematic review. Cancer Med. 2020;9(22):8279-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3582 PMid:33107198.
  113. Choosing Wisely [Internet]. Philadelphia: Choosing Wisely; c2022 [citado em 2021 Out 11]. Disponível em: http://www.choosingwisely.org/about-us/history. /acessado em agosto de 2021/
     
631d67a5a9539544c41b5cc4 codas Articles
2317-1782 (Eletrônico)
CoDAS ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections