CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021024
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Immediate effects of photobiomodulation on maximum lip pressure

Efeitos imediatos da fotobiomodulação sobre a pressão máxima dos lábios

Vanessa Mouffron; Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan; Andréa Rodrigues Motta

Downloads: 1
Views: 576

Abstract

Purpose: To verify the immediate effects of different doses of photobiomodulation on maximum lip pressure. Methods: Experimental, randomized and triple-blind study. The sample consisted of 23 women and 17 men, age between 18 and 33 years old (average 23.18 years old, SD=2.1), distributed in four groups: CG (control group), G1, G4 and G7. The maximum pressure was assessed with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). The bulb was placed between the lips and the participants were instructed to press it as strong as possible. Infrared LASER (808 nm), manufactured by DMC, Therapy EC model, 100 mW of power output, was applied. The doses tested were 1 J (G1), 4 J (G4) and 7 J (G7), applied at six points of the orbicularis oris muscle. In the CG there was no intervention. The evaluation procedures were repeated after the LASER application. The results were analyzed with a significance level of 95%. Results: The maximum lip pressure increased significantly only in the group irradiated with 7 J. Conclusion: Low level LASER therapy with 7 J dose promoted changes in the performance of the orbicularis oris muscle in the maximum pressure task.

Keywords

Low-level Light Therapy; Lip; Muscle Strenght; Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences; Myofunctional Therapy

Resumo

Objetivo: Verificar os efeitosimediatos da fotobiomodulação sobre a pressão máxima doslábios para diferentes doses. Método: Estudo experimental, randomizado e triplo cego. A amostra foi composta por 23 mulheres e 17 homens com idade entre 18 e 33 anos (média 23,18 anos, DP=2,1), divididos em quatro grupos: GC (grupo controle), G1, G4 e G7.Apressão máxima foi avaliada com o Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI). O bulbo foi posicionado entre os lábios e os participantes foram orientados a pressioná-lo com a maior força possível. Aplicou-se o LASER infravermelho (808 nm) da marca DMC, modelo Therapy EC, 100 mW de potência. As doses testadas foram 1 J (G1), 4 J (G4) e 7 J (G7) aplicadas em seis pontos do músculo orbicular da boca. No GC não houve intervenção. Após a aplicação do LASER, foram repetidos os procedimentos de avaliação. Os resultados foram analisados com nível de significância de 95%. Resultados: A pressão máxima de lábios aumentou significativamente apenas no grupo irradiado com 7 joules. Conclusão: O LASER de baixa intensidade na dose de 7 J promoveu mudanças no desempenho do músculo orbicular da boca em tarefa de pressão máxima.

Palavras-chave

Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade; Lábio; Força Muscular; Fonoaudiologia; Terapia Miofuncional

Referências

1. Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ,Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(4):183-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.9848. PMid:25844681.

2. Garcez AS, Suzuki SS. Terapia LASER de baixa potência nas desordens temporomandibulares. In: Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Núnez SC, editores. LASER de baixa potência: princípios básicos e aplicações clínicas na Odontologia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2012. p. 357-75.

3. Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy.J Biophotonics. 2016;9(11-12):1122-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201670113. PMid:27973730.

4. Karu T. Photobiology of low power laser effects. Health Phys. 1989;56(5):691- 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198905000-00015. PMid:2651364.

5. Kisner C, Colby LA. Exercícios terapêuticos: fundamentos e técnicas. 5ª ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2009.

6. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Tratado de fisiologia médica. 13ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2017.

7. Leal-Junior EC, VaninAA, Miranda EF, Carvalho PT, Dal Corso S, Bjordal JM. Effect of phototherapy (low-level laser therapy and light-emitting diode therapy) on exercise performance and markers of exercise recovery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):925- 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1465-4. PMid:24249354.

8. Nampo FK, Cavalheri V, Soares FS, Ramos SP, Camargo EA. Low-level phototherapy to improve exercise capacity and muscle performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(9):1957- 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1977-9. PMid:27272746.

9. Vanin AA, Verhagen E, Barboza SD, Costa LOP, Leal-Junior ECP. Photobiomodulation therapy for the improvement of muscular performance and reduction of muscular fatigue associated with exercise in healthy people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(1):181- 214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2368-6. PMid:29090398.

10. Rahal A. Fisiologia do exercício. In: Busanello-Stella AR, Stefani FM, Gomes E, Silva HJ, TessitoreA, MottaAR, et al. Evidências e perspectivas em motricidade orofacial. São José dos Campos: Pulso; 2018. p. 113-9.

11. Machado BC, Mazzetto MO, Silva MA, Felício CM. Effects of oral motor exercises and LASER therapy on chronic temporomandibular disorders: a randomized study with follow-up. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(5):945-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1935-6.

12. Alves GÂS, Gondim YRR, Lima JAS, Silva MAPS, Florêncio DSF, Almeida LNA, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation associated with orofacial myofactional therapy on temporomandibular joint dysfunction. CoDAS. 2021;33(6):e20200193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020193. PMid:34105614.

13. Navratil L, Kymplova J. Contraindications in noninvasive laser therapy: truth and fiction. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2002;20(6):341-3. http://dx.doi. org/10.1089/104454702320901134. PMid:12513921.

14. Clark HM, Solomon NP. Age and Sex Differences in Orofacial Strength. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):2-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9328-2. PMid:21350818.

15. Potter NL, Kent RD, Lazarus JA. Oral and manual force control in preschool-aged children: is there evidence for common control? J Mot Behav. 2009;41(1):66-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2009.101 25919. PMid:19073472.

16. Adams V, Mathisen B, Baines S, Lazarus C, Callister R. Reliability of measurements of tongue and hand strength and endurance using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument with healthy adults. Dysphagia. 2014;29(1):83- 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9486-5. PMid:24045852.

17. Vitorino J. Effect of age on tongue strength and endurance scores of healthy Portuguese speakers. IntJ Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12(3):237-43. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3109/17549501003746160. PMid:20433342.

18. Muñoz ISS, Hauck LA, Nicolau RA, Kelencz CA, Maciel TS, Paula AR Jr. Effect of laser vs LED in the near infrared region on the skeletal muscle activity: clinical study. Rev Bras Eng Bioméd. 2013;29(3):262-8. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbeb.2013.023.

19. Alves VMN, Furlan RMMM, Motta AR. Immediate effects of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy on muscle performance: an integrative literature review. Rev CEFAC. 2019;21(4):e12019. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/201921412019.

20. De Luca CJ. The use ofsurface electromyography in biomechamics.JAppl Biomech. 1997;13(2):135-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.13.2.135. 21. Ferraresi C, Huang YY, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation in human muscle tissue: an advantage in sports performance? J Biophotonics. 2016;9(11- 12):1273-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600176. PMid:27874264.

22. Leal-Junior ECP, Lopes-Martins RAB, Bjordal JM. Clinical and scientific recommendations for the use of photobiomodulation therapy in exercise performance enhancement and post-exercise recovery: current evidence and future directions. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(1):71-5. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.002. PMid:30591412.

23. Murakami M,Adachi T, Nakatsuka K, Kato T, Oishi M, Masuda Y. Gender differences in maximum voluntary lip‐closing force during lip pursing in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(6):399-404. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02268.x. PMid:22115393.

24. Abe T, Wong V, Spitz RW, Viana RB, Bell ZW, Yamada Y, et al. Influence of sex and resistance training status on orofacial muscle strength and morphology in healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 40: a crosssectional study. Am J Hum Biol. 2020;32(6):e23401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ ajhb.23401. PMid:32030840.

25. Alighieri C, Bettens K, Roche N, Bruneel L, Van Lierde K. Lipofilling in patients with a cleft lip (and-palate): a pilotstudy assessing functional outcomes and patients satisfaction with appearance. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;128:109692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109692. PMid:31568953.

26. Toma RL, Vassão PG, Assis L, Antunes HK, Renno AC. Low level laser therapy associated with a strength training program on muscle performance in elderly women: a randomized double blind control study. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(6):1219-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1967-y. PMid:27250715.

27. Vassão PG, Toma RL, Antunes HK, Tucci HT, Renno AC. Effects of photobiomodulation on the fatigue level in elderly women: an isokineticdynamometry evaluation. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(2):275-82. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10103-015-1858-7. PMid:26714981.

28. Toma RL, Tucci HT, Antunes HK, Pedroni CR, Oliveira CS, Buck I, et al. Effect of 808 nm low-level laser therapy in exerciseinduced skeletal muscle fatigue in elderly women. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(5):1375-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1246-5. PMid:23296713.

29. Leal EC Jr, Lopes-Martins RA, Baroni BM, De Marchi T, Taufer D, Manfro DS, et al. Effect of 830 nm low-level laser therapy applied before high-intensity exercises on skeletal muscle recovery in athletes. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(6):857-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0633-4. PMid:19057981.

30. Vieira WHB, Bezerra RM, Queiroz RA, Maciel NF, Parizotto NA, Ferraresi C. Use of low-level laser therapy (808 nm) to muscle fatigue resistance: a randomized double-blind crossover trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(12):678-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3812. PMid:25496083.

61ddc5e0a9539536d5438cf2 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections