CoDAS
https://codas.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020300
CoDAS
Artigo Original

Efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente na síndrome de Turner

Efferent Auditory Pathways Inhibition in Turner syndrome

Martha Marcela de Matos Bazilio; Adriana Fernandes Duarte dos Santos; Silvana Frota; Marília Guimarães; Márcia Gonçalves Ribeiro

Downloads: 0
Views: 809

Resumo

Objetivo: investigar o efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente na síndrome de Turner e relacionar com o perfil citogenético. Método: estudo descritivo transversal com grupo de comparação. Amostra: Grupo estudo formado por 40 pacientes com síndrome de Turner (17,6 anos); e Grupo controle constituído por 54 indivíduos (18,9 anos), do sexo feminino sem síndrome. Os indivíduos selecionados foram submetidos à pesquisa do efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente. Resultados: A média do Efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente no grupo estudo na orelha direita foi 0,4 dB e no grupo comparação foi de 1,9 dB, entretanto na orelha esquerda a média do efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente foi 1,4 dB no grupo estudo e 0,8 dB no grupo comparação. O efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente foi presente em 14 indivíduos com monossomia e em 15 com outras alterações citogenéticas. Conclusão: No grupo estudo o valor do efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente foi significantemente maior na orelha esquerda e significativamente menor que o grupo controle na direita. Não houve diferença significativa no efeito inibitório da via auditiva eferente entre os tipos de cariótipo.

Palavras-chave

Síndrome de Turner; Disgenesia Gonadal 45X; Via Eferente; Complexo Olivar Superior; Emissões Otoacústicas

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study is to investigate the efferent auditory pathways inhibition in Turner’s syndrome and to relate it to the cytogenetic profile. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with a comparison group. A sample with 94 participants divided into two groups: The study group was a sample of 40 patients diagnosed with Turner’s syndrome (17.6 years of age). The control group was composed of 54 volunteers (18.9 years of age), female, without syndrome. The selected individuals were submitted to efferent auditory pathways inhibition research. Results: The mean of the inhibitory effect of the efferent auditory pathway in the study group in the right ear was 0.4 dB and in the comparison group it was 1.9 dB, however in the left ear the mean of the inhibitory effect of the efferent auditory pathway was 1.4 dB in the study group and 0.8 dB in the comparison group. The inhibitory effect of the efferent auditory pathway was present in 14 individuals with monosomy and in 15 with other cytogenetic alterations. Conclusions: In the study group, the efferent auditory pathways inhibition value was significantly higher in the left ear and significantly lower than the control group in the right ear. There was no significant difference in efferent auditory pathways inhibition of right ear and left ear between the karyotype types

Keywords

Turner Syndrome; XO Gonadal Dysgenesis; Efferent pathways; Superior olivary complex; Otoacoustic emissions

Referências

1) Kubba H, McAllister K, Hunter K, Mason A. Annual hearing screening in girls with Turner Syndrome: results from the first three years in Glasgow. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;120:152-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.025 PMid:30798112.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.025
2) Mandelli AS, Abramides DVM. Manifestações clínicas e fonoaudiológicas na síndrome de Turner: estudo bibliográfico. Rev CEFAC. 2012;14(1):146-55.
3) Bois E, Nassar M, Zenaty D, Léger J, Abeele TVD, Teissier N. Otologic disorders in Turner syndrome. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018;135(1):21-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.08.006 PMid:28941966.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2017.08.006
4) Bonnard Å, Bark R, Hederstierna C. Clinical update on sensorineural hearing loss in Turner syndrome and the X- chromossome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019;181(1):18-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31673 PMid:30632288.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31673
5) Bazilio MM, Santos AFD, Almeida FG, Frota S, Guimarães M, Ribeiro MG. Association between cytogenetic alterationand the audiometric profile of individuals with Turner syndrome. Braz Journ Otorhinol. 2020; [In press].
6) Momensohn-Santos TM, Dias AMN, Valente CHB, Assayag FM. Prática da Audiologia Clínica. 6. ed. São Paulo: Editora Cortez; 2007. Anatomia e Fisiologia do órgão da Audição e do Equilíbrio; p. 12-43.
7) Fávero ML, Sanchez TG, Bento RF. Vias auditivas eferentes e seu papel no sistema auditivo. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol. 2001;72(5):575-9.
8) Guinan JJ Jr. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):589-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000240507.83072.e7 PMid:17086072.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000240507.83072.e7
9) Jesus NO, Angrisani RG, Maruta EC, Azevedo MF. Efeito de supressão das Emissões Otoacústicas em lactentes termo e pré-termo. CoDAS. 2016;28(4):331-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015153 PMid:27509398.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015153
10) Guinan JJ Jr, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: Otoacoustic Emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003;4(4):521-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-002-3037-3 PMid:12799992.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-002-3037-3
11) OMS: Organização Mundial de Saúde [Internet]. Prevention of blindness and deafness: grades of hearing impairment. Geneve: WHO. 1997 [citado em 2017 Nov 04]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/pdf/deafness/hearing_impairment/grades/
» http://www.who.int/pdf/deafness/hearing_impairment/grades/
12) Hederstierna C, Hulcrantz M, Rosenhal U. Estrogen and hearing from a clinical point of view; characteristics of auditory function in Women with Turner syndrome. Hear Res. 2009;252(1-2):3-8. PMid:19095053.
13) Menegotto IH. Logoaudiometria básica. In: Bevilaqua F, Martinez S, Balen MAN, Pupo SA, Reis AC, Barbosa ACM, editores. Tratado de Audiologia. 1. ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2012, p. 81-99.
14) Durante AS. Emissões otoacústicas. In: Bevilaqua F, Martinez S, Balen MAN, Pupo SA, Reis AC, Barbosa ACM, editores. Tratado de Audiologia. 1. ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2012, p. 145-56.
15) Collet L, Veuillet E, Bene J, Morgan A. Effects of contralateral white noise on click – evoked emissions in normal and sensorineural ears: towards an exploration of the medial olivocochlear system. Audiology. 1992;31(1):1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206099209072897 PMid:1554329.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206099209072897
16) Antunes AM, Costa AJ, Haase VG. Variações cariotípicas na Síndrome de Turner: uma análise do fenótipo cognitivo. Rev Interinst Psic. 2015;8(2):348-58.
17) Silva TR, Dias FAM. Laterality of activity of medial olivocochlear efferent system: prelinary study. Rev CEFAC. 2015;17(6):1855-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620151768615
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620151768615
18) Thunström S, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Bryman I, Hanson C. Side diferences in the degree of mosaicismo f the buccal mucosa in Turner syndrome. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(10):e00938. PMid:31466136.
19) Barros BA, Maciel-Guerra AT, Mello MP, Coeli FB, Carvalho AB, Viguetti-Campos N, et al. A inclusão de novas técnicas de análise citogenética aperfeiçoou o diagnóstico cromossômico da síndrome de Turner. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2009;53(9):1137-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27302009000900010
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27302009000900010
20) Moore K, Persaud TVN, Tochia MG. A terceira semana do Desenvolvimento Humano. In: Moor K, editor. Embriologia Básica. 9. ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
21) Ryan S, Kemp DT. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res. 1996;94(1-2):140-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(96)00021-4 PMid:8789819.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(96)00021-4
22) Gkoritsa E, Korres S, Psarommatis I, Tsakanikos M, Apostolopoulos N, Ferekidis E. Maturation of the auditory system:1. Transient otoacoustic emissions as na index of inner ear maturation. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(6):271-6. PMid:17530511.
23) Veuillet E, Georgieff N, Philibert B, Dalery J, Marie-Cardine M, Collet L. Abnormal peripheral auditory asymmetry in schizophrenia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):88-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.1.88 PMid:11118254.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.1.88
24) Reuss S, Closhen-Gabrisch S, Closhen C. The brainstem efferent acoustic chiasm in pigmented and albino rats. Hear Res. 2016;332:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.012 PMid:26657095.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.012
25) Mishra SK. Medial efferent mechanisms in children with auditory processing disorders. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:860. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00860 PMid:25386132.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00860
26) Mishra SK, Lutman ME. Top-down influences of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in speech perception in noise. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085756 PMid:24465686.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085756
27) Paschoal CP, Azevedo MF. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for auditory problems. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(6):893-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30556-5
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30556-5
28) Oliveira M, Roberta J, Candido FF, Orozimbo ACF. Estudo da supressão da amplitude das Emissões Otoacústicas: dominância lateral. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaringology. 2011;77(5):547-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000500002
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000500002
29) Gawron W, Wikiera B, Rostkowska-Nadolska B, Orendorz-Fraczkowska K, Noczyńska A. Evaluation of hearing organ in patients with Turner syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(5):575-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.01.021 PMid:18343510.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.01.021
30) Coelho MSB, Ferraz JRS, Almeida EOC, Almeida NA Fo. As emissões otoacústicas no diagnóstico diferencial das perdas auditivas induzidas por ruído. Rev CEFAC. 2010;12(6):1050-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010005000108
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010005000108


Aceito em:
04/02/2021

6195632ba95395545074b953 codas Articles

CoDAS

Share this page
Page Sections