Restrição à participação de adultos e idosos: associação com fatores auditivos e socioambientais
Participation restriction of adults and elderly users of an audiology clinic: association with auditory and social-environmental factors
Valquíria Conceição Souza; Stela Maris Aguiar Lemos
Resumo
Objetivo: Verificar a associação entre a restrição à participação auditiva com a qualidade de vida, a autopercepção de saúde, os fatores auditivos e os aspectos sociodemográficos de adultos e idosos atendidos em um serviço de audiologia. Método: Participaram do estudo 152 indivíduos e a restrição à participação auditiva foi avaliada por meio dos instrumentos Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults – HHIA e o Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly – HHIE. Para a avaliação da qualidade de vida os participantes responderam o World Health Organization Quality of Life- versão abreviada (WHOQOL-bref). As características sociodemográficos foram avaliadas por meio de um questionário de caracterização dos participantes e pelo Critério Brasil ABEP, também foram coletados os resultados da avaliação auditiva. Foram realizadas análises estatísticas descritiva, bivariada (p ≤ 0,20) e regressão logística múltipla (p ≤ 0,05) Resultados: Em relação à classe social, indivíduos pertencentes às classes B1 e C2 possuíam respectivamente, 4,75 e 7,73 vezes chances maiores de apresentar restrição à participação auditiva quando comparados aos indivíduos da classe D. Em relação aos fatores auditivos, ter perda auditiva incapacitante aumentou em 3,4 vezes a chance de apresentar percepção de restrição à participação auditiva. No domínio ambiental do instrumento Whoqol-Bref, a cada unidade aumentada no escore, houve diminuição de 0,96 vezes a chance de percepção de restrição na participação auditiva. Conclusão: Verificou-se que apenas o uso do aparelho de amplificação sonora individual, apesar dos benefícios, não foi capaz de eliminar a presença da restrição à participação auditiva da maioria dos participantes.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To verify the association between restrictions to auditory participation and quality of life, self-perceived health, auditory factors and sociodemographic aspects of adults and elderlies assisted in an audiology service. Methods: The study included 152 participants; restrictions to auditory participation were assessed using the instruments Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults - HHIA and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly - HHIE. In order to assess the quality of life, participants answered the World Health Organization Quality of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-bref). Sociodemographic characteristics were assessed using a questionnaire to characterize the participants; and by the Brazilian Criteria ABEP. The results of the hearing assessment were also collected. Descriptive, bivariate statistical analyzes (p ≤ 0.20) and multiple logistic regression (p ≤ 0.05) were performed. Results: Regarding social class, individuals belonging to classes B1 and C2 had, respectively, 4.75 and 7.73 times greater chances of presenting restrictions to auditory participation compared to individuals of class D. Regarding hearing factors, disabling hearing loss increased by 3.4 times the chance of presenting perception of restriction to auditory participation. In the environmental domain of the WHOQOL-bref instrument, each unit increased in the score was associated with a decrease of 0.96 times in the chance of perceived restriction in auditory participation. Conclusion: We found that the use of the amplifying hearing aid by itself, despite its benefits, did not eliminate the restrictions on auditory participation of most participants.
Keywords
Referencias
1) WHO: World Health Organization. Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018 [citado em 2020 Jun 30]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260336/9789241550260-eng.pdf?sequence=1&ua=1
» https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260336/9789241550260-eng.pdf?sequence=1&ua=1
2) IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico: resultados [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2014 [citado em 2015 Nov 9]. Disponível em: http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultados
» http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultados
3) Alfakir R, Holmes AE, Noreen F. Functional performance in older adults with hearing loss: application of the International Classification of Functioning brief core set for hearing loss: a pilot study. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(9):579-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903 PMid:25816864.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903
4) Helvik AS, Jacobsen G, Wennberg S, Arnesen H, Ringdahl A, Hallberg LR. Activity limitation and participation restriction in adults seeking hearing aid fitting and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(5):281-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280500160311 PMid:16492622.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280500160311
5) Helvik AS, Krokstad S, Tambs K. Socioeconomic inequalities in hearing loss in a healthy population sample: the HUNT study. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(8):1376-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.133215 PMid:19542048.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.133215
6) Hallberg LR, Hallberg U, Kramer SE. Self-reported hearing difficulties, communication strategies and psychological general well-being (quality of life) in patients with acquired hearing impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(3):203-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701228073 PMid:17852289.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701228073
7) McArdle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):127-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108471380500900304 PMid:16244759.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108471380500900304
8) Dawes P, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Hearing-aid use and long-term health outcomes: hearing handicap, mental health, social engagement, cognitive function, physical health, and mortality. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(11):838-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1059503 PMid:26140300.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1059503
9) Dawes P, Fortnum H, Moore DR, Emsley R, Norman P, Cruickshanks K, et al. Hearing in middle age: a population snapshot of 40- to 69-year olds in the United Kingdom. Ear Hear. 2014;35(3):e44-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000010 PMid:24518430.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000010
10) Dashti R, Khiavi FF, Sameni SJ, Bayat A. Satisfaction with hearing aids among aged patients with different degrees of hearing loss and length of daily use. J Audiol Otol. 2015;19(1):14-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.14 PMid:26185786.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.14
11) Lutman ME, Robinson DW. Quantification of hearing disability for medicolegal purposes based on self-rating. Br J Audiol. 1992;26(5):297-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03005369209076651 PMid:1486358.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03005369209076651
12) Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H. Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology. 1995;34(6):311-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206099509071921 PMid:8833311.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00206099509071921
13) Metselaar M, Maat B, Krijnen P, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Feenstra L. Self-reported disability and handicap after hearing-aid fitting and benefit of hearing aids: comparison of fitting procedures, degree of hearing loss, experience with hearing aids and uni- and bilateral fittings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(6):907-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0847-x PMid:19005632.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0847-x
14) Umansky AM, Jeffe DB, Lieu JE. The HEAR-QL: quality of life questionnaire for children with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22(10):644-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.22.10.3 PMid:22212764.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.22.10.3
15) Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear. 1990;11(6):430-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199012000-00004 PMid:2073976.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199012000-00004
16) Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982;3(3):128-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006 PMid:7095321.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006
17) leck MPA, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, et al. Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-bref. Rev Saude Publica. 2000;34(2):178-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102000000200012 PMid:10881154.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102000000200012
18) ABEP: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil [Internet]. São Paulo: ABEP; 2014 [citado em 2015 Out 9]. Disponível em: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil
» http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil
19) WHO: World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020 [citado em 2020 Jun 30]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
» https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
20) Chisolm TH, Willott JF, Lister JJ. The aging auditory system: anatomic and physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(Supl. 2):S3-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074637 PMid:12918622.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074637
21) Luz VB, Silva MC, Scharlach RC, Iório MCM. Correlation between the handicap and the benefit of hearing aid use in adults and elderly. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(2):160-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000200009
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342011000200009
22) Guarinello AC, Marcelos SB, Ribas A, Marques JM. Analysis of the perception of a group of seniors about their hearing handicap before and after hearing aid use. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2013;16(4):739-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232013000400008
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232013000400008
23) Vuorialho A, Karinen P, Sorri M. Counselling of hearing aid users is highly cost-effective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(11):988-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0104-0 PMid:16799805.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0104-0
24) Preminger JE, Meeks S. Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(5):315-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.5.4 PMid:20569666.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.5.4
25) Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n. 2.073/GM, de 28 de setembro de 2004. Institui a Política Nacional de Atenção à Saúde [Internet]. Diário Oficial da União; Brasília; 2004 [citado em 2016 Jan 20]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2004/prt2073_28_09_2004.html
» http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2004/prt2073_28_09_2004.html
26) Pierre PV, Fridberger A, Wikman A, Alexanderson K. Self-reported hearing difficulties, main income sources, and socio-economic status; a cross-sectional population-based study in Sweden. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-874 PMid:23067045.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-874
27) Manchaiah VKC, Molander P, Rönnberg J, Andersson G, Lunner T. The acceptance of hearing disability among adults experiencing hearing difficulties: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):e004066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004066 PMid:24401726.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004066
28) Ribas A, Kozlowski L, Almeida G, Marques JM, Silvestre RAA, Mottecy CM. Quality of life: comparing results in elderly with and without presbyacusis. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol. 2014;17(2):353-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232014000200012
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1809-98232014000200012
29) Mondelli MF, Souza PJ. Quality of life in elderly adults before and after hearing aid fitting. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2012;78(3):49-56. PMid:22714847.
30) Dawes P, Emsley R, Cruickshanks KJ, Moore DR, Fortnum H, Edmondson-Jones M, et al. Hearing loss and cognition: the role of hearing aids, social isolation and depression. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119616 PMid:25760329.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119616
Submitted date:
14/07/2020
Accepted date:
19/12/2020
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email