Efeito imediato da hidratação laríngea de superfície associada à técnica de vibração sonorizada de língua em cantores amadores
Immediate effect of surface laryngeal hydration associated with tongue trill technique in amateur singers
Maria Cecilia Bayer Pereira, Suely Mayumi Motonaga Onofri, Evelyn Alves Spazzapan, Joyra da Silva Carrer, Luana Alves da Silva, Eliana Maria Gradim Fabbron
Resumo
Objetivo: Analisar o efeito imediato da hidratação de superfície laríngea associado à técnica de vibração sonorizada de língua (TVSL) em cantores. Método: Participaram 30 cantores, sem queixas vocais ou alterações laríngeas, divididos em grupo controle (GC) e experimental (GE). O GC realizou a TVSL por cinco minutos. O GE foi submetido à nebulização de 3 ml de solução salina seguido da TVSL por cinco minutos. Foram realizadas autoavaliação vocal, análise acústica e avaliação perceptivoauditiva nos momentos pré (PréTVSL) e pós (PTVSL) no GC e no momento pré (PréHTVSL), pós hidratação (PH) e pós hidratação+TVSL (PHTVSL) no GE. Na autoavaliação foram avaliados: qualidade, estabilidade, rouquidão e intensidade vocal. Os parâmetros acústicos analisados foram Frequência Fundamental; Jitter%; Shimmer%, Noise-to-harmonic Ratio e Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPs). A avaliação perceptivoauditiva foi realizada por uma fonoaudióloga experiente. Resultados: Na comparação dos resultados da autoavaliação, entre os grupos, observou-se melhora da percepção de estabilidade e intensidade vocal no PTVSL (GC) em relação ao PH (GE). Na comparação entre os momentos do GE houve diferença estatística na sensação de intensidade vocal, apontando melhor resultado para PHTVSL. Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos investigados na avaliação perceptivoauditiva e na análise acústica. Conclusão: A hidratação laríngea de superfície não potencializa o efeito da TVSL em cantores em condição natural de hidratação com uso de 3ml de nebulização. Para os profissionais da voz com grande demanda vocal, a hidratação de superfície pode ser introduzida durante a utilização da voz, para manutenção da qualidade vocal, sem perda de sua qualidade.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the immediate effect of laryngeal surface hydration associated with the performance of Tongue Trills (TT) on singers. Methods: Thirty singers without vocal complaints or laryngeal alterations divided into control (CG) and experimental (EG) groups. The CG performed the TT for five minutes. The EG was submitted a nebulization with 3 ml of saline solution followed by TT for five minutes. Voice self-assessment, acoustic analysis and perceptual assessment were performed at Pre (Pre TT) and post (PTT) moments in CG and pre (Pre TT), post hydration (PH) and post hydration + TT (PHTT) in GE. In the self-assessment were evaluated quality, stability, vocal intensity and hoarseness. There were extract the values of the Fundamental frequency; Jitter%; Shimmer%, Noise-to-harmonic Ratio e Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPs) in the acoustic analyze. The perceptual evaluation was performed by an experienced speech therapist. Results: Comparing the results of self-assessment between groups showed improvement in the perception of stability and vocal intensity in the PTT (CG) in relation to PH (EG). Comparison between the EG moments showed a statistical difference in the vocal intensity perception, indicating a better results for PHTT. There was no statistical difference between the groups investigated in the perceptual assessments and acoustic analysis. Conclusion: Surface laryngeal hydration does not potentiate the effect of TT on naturally hydrated singers with 3ml nebulization. For voice professionals with high vocal demand, surface hydration can be introduced during voice use to maintain vocal quality.
Keywords
References
1. Alves M, Krüger E, Pillay B, van Lierde K, van der Linde J. The effect of hydration on voice quality in adults: a systematic review. J Voice. 2019;33(1):125.e13-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.001. PMid:29122414.
2. Leydon C, Wroblewski M, Eichorn N, Sivasankar M. A meta-analysis of outcomes of hydration intervention on phonation threshold pressure. J Voice. 2010;24(6):637-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.06.001. PMid:20359862.
3. van Wyk L, Cloete M, Hattingh D, van der Linde J, Geertsema S. The effect of hydration on the voice quality of future professional vocal performers. J Voice. 2017;31(1):111.e29-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jvoice.2016.01.002. PMid:26873423.
4. Tanner K, Roy N, Merrill RM, Muntz F, Houtz DR, Sauder C, et al. Nebulized isotonic saline versus water following a laryngeal desiccation challenge in classically trained sopranos. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(6):1555-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0249). PMid:20699338.
5. Tanner K, Fujiki RB, Dromey C, Merrill RM, Robb W, Kendall KA, et al. Laryngeal desiccation challenge and nebulized isotonic saline in healthy male singers and nonsingers: effects on acoustic, aerodynamic, and selfperceived effort and dryness measures. J Voice. 2016;30(6):670-6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.08.016. PMid:26412295.
6. Mahalingam S, Boominathan P. Effects of steam inhalation on voice quality-related acoustic measures. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(10):2305-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25933. PMid:26972609.
7. Santana ÉR, Masson MLV, Araújo TM. The effect of surface hydration on teachers’ voice quality: an intervention study. J Voice. 2017;31(3):383. e5-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.08.019. PMid:27765431.
8. Fujiki RB, Chapleau A, Sundarrajan A, McKenna V, Sivasankar MP. The interaction of surface hydration and vocal loading on voice measures. J Voice. 2017;31(2):211-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.005. PMid:27522343.
9. Masson MLV, de Araújo TM. Protective strategies against dysphonia in teachers: preliminary results comparing voice amplification and 0.9% NaCl nebulization. J Voice. 2018;32(2):257.e1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jvoice.2017.04.013. PMid:28579158.
10. Vermeulen R, van der Linde J, Abdoola S, van Lierde K, Graham MA. The Effect of superficial hydration, with or without systemic hydration, on voice quality in future female professional singers. J Voice. 2020; In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.01.008. PMid:32046884.
11. Tanner K, Roy N, Merrill RM, Kendall K, Miller KL, Clegg DO, et al. Comparing nebulized water versus saline after laryngeal desiccation challenge in Sjögren’s Syndrome. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):2787-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.24148. PMid:23674107.
12. de Vasconcelos D, Gomes A OC, de Araújo CMT. Voiced lip and tongue trill technique: literature review. Distúrb Comun. 2016;28(3):581-93.
13. Cordeiro GF, Montagnoli AN, Ubrig MT, Menezes MHM, Tsuji DH. Comparison of tongue and lip trills with phonation of the sustained vowel /e/ regarding the periodicity of the electroglottographic waveform and the amplitude of the electroglottographic signal. Open J Acoust. 2015;30(4):226- 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oja.2015.54018.
14. Azevedo LL, Passaglio KT, Rosseti MB, da Silva CB, de Oliveira BFV, Costa RC. Avaliação da performance vocal antes e após a vibração sonorizada de língua. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(3):343-8. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342010000300006.
15. Pimenta RA, Dájer ME, Hachiya A, Tsuji DH, Montagnoli AN. Parameters Acoustic and High-speed kymography identified effects of voiced vibration and vocal fry exercises. CoDAS. 2013;25(6):577-83. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S2317-17822014000100010. PMid:24626983.
16. Lima AT, Lucena JA, de Araújo ANB, de Lira ZS, Gomes AOC. Vocal range profile of chorists after the tongue-trill technique associated with scales. Rev CEFAC. 2016;18(3):626-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982- 0216201618315415.
17. Fabron EMG, Petrini AS, Cardoso VM, Batista JCT, Motonaga SM, Marino VCC. Immediate effects of tongue trills associated with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). CoDAS. 2017;29(3):e20150311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20172015311. PMid:28614457.
18. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.3.56. [Internet]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2005 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from: http://www.praat.org
19. Maryn Y, Weenink D. Objective dysphonia measures in the program praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index. J Voice. 2015;29(1):35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.015. PMid:25499526.
20. Fadel CBX, Dassie-Leite AP, Santos RS, Santos CG Jr, Dias CAS, Sartori DJ. Immediate effects of the semi-occluded vocal tract exercise with LaxVox® tube in singers. CoDAS. 2016;28(5):618-24. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015168. PMid:27849247.
21. Titze IR. Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49(2):448-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035). PMid:16671856.
22. Schwarz K, Cielo CA. Modificações laríngeas e vocais produzidas pela técnica de vibração sonorizada de língua. Pro Fono. 2009;21(2):161-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872009000200013. PMid:19629328.
23. Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: american speech-language-hearing association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):887-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009. PMid:29955816.
24. Lopes LW, Sousa ESS, Silva ACF, Silva IM, Paiva MAA, Vieira VJD, et al. Cepstral measures in the assessment of severity of voice disorders. CoDAS. 2019;31(4):e20180175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182018175. PMid:31433040.
25. Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P, Corthals P. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: A meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;126(5):2619-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3224706. PMid:19894840.
26. Spazzapan EA, Cardoso VM, Fabron EMG, Berti LC, Brasolotto AG, Marino VCC. Acoustic characteristics of healthy voices of adults: from young to middle age. CoDAS. 2018;30(5):e20170225. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182017225. PMid:30365649.
27. Spazzapan EA, Marino VCC, Cardoso VM, Berti LC, Fabron EMG. Acoustic characteristics of voice in different cycles of life: an integrative literature review. Rev CEFAC. 2019;21(3):e15018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982- 0216/201921315018.
28. Phadke KV, Laukkanen AM, Ilomäki I, Kankare E, Geneid A, Švec JG. Cepstral and perceptual investigations in female teachers with functionally healthy voice. J Voice. 2020;349(3):485.e33-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jvoice.2018.09.010. PMid:30342798.
29. Watts CR, Awan SN, Maryn Y. A comparison of cepstral peak prominence measures from two acoustic analysis programs. J Voice. 2017;31(3):387.e1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.012. PMid:27751661.
30. Oates J. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009;61(1):49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000200768. PMid:19204393.
Submitted date:
01/28/2020
Accepted date:
05/30/2020
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email