Potenciais evocados auditivos corticais no transtorno do espectro do autismo: revisão sistemática
Cortical auditory evoked potentials in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review
Mariana Keiko Kamita, Liliane Aparecida Fagundes Silva, Carla Gentile Matas
Resumo
Objetivo: Identificar e analisar quais são os achados característicos dos Potenciais Evocados Auditivos Corticais (PEAC) em crianças e/ou adolescentes com Transtorno do Espectro do Autismo (TEA) em comparação do desenvolvimento típico, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Estratégia de pesquisa: Após formulação da pergunta de pesquisa, foi realizada uma revisão da literatura em sete bases de dados (Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, Scielo, Science Direct, e Google acadêmico), com os seguintes descritores: transtorno do espectro autista (autism spectrum disorder), transtorno autístico (autistic disorder), potenciais evocados auditivos (evoked potentials, auditory), potencial evocado P300 (event related potentials, P300) e criança (child). A presente revisão foi cadastrada no Próspero, sob número 118751. Critérios de seleção: Foram selecionados estudos publicados na integra, sem limitação de idioma, entre 2007 e 2019. Análise dos dados: Foram analisadas as características de latência e amplitude dos componentes P1, N1, P2, N2 e P3 presentes nos PEAC. Resultados: Foram localizados 193 estudos; contudo 15 estudos contemplaram os critérios de inclusão. Embora não tenha sido possível identificar um padrão de resposta para os componentes P1, N1, P2, N2 e P3, os resultados da maioria dos estudos demonstraram que indivíduos com TEA podem apresentar diminuição de amplitude e aumento de latência do componente P3. Conclusão: Indivíduos com TEA podem apresentar respostas diversas para os componentes dos PEAC, sendo que a diminuição de amplitude e aumento de latência do componente P3 foram as características mais comuns.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To identify and analyze what are the characteristic findings of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEP) in children and / or adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) compared to typical development, through a systematic literature review. Research strategies: Based on the formulation of a research question, a bibliographic survey was carried out in seven databases (Web of Science, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs, Scielo, Science Direct, and Google Sholar), with the following descriptors: autism spectrum disorder (transtorno do espectro autista), autistic disorder (transtorno autístico), evoked potentials, auditory (potenciais evocados auditivos), event related potentials, P300 (potencial evocado P300) e child (criança). This review was registered in Prospero, under number 118751. Selection criteria: Were selected articles published, without language limitation, between 2007 and 2019. Data analysis: The characteristics of the latency and amplitude aspects of the P1, N1, P2, N2 and P3 components present in the CAEP. Results: 193 studies were located; however, 15 original articles were included the inclusion criteria for this study. Although it has not been possible to identify any pattern of response for the P1, N1, P2 and N2 components, the results of the selected studies have demonstrated that individuals with ASD may present a decrease in amplitude and increase in latency of the P3 component. Conclusion: Individuals with ASD may present different responses to the components of the CAEP, and the decrease of the amplitude and increase of the latency of the P3 component were the most common characteristics.
Keywords
Referências
1. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. 10th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1993 [citado em 2017 Mar 3]. Disponível em: http://www.who. int/classifications/icd/en/GRNBOOK.pdf
2. American Psychiatric Association. Manual diagnostico e estatístico de transtornos mentais: DSM-5. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2014.
3. Sousa EC, Lima FT, Tamanaha AC, Perissinoto J, Azevedo MF, Chiari BM. A associação entre a suspeita inicial de perda auditiva e a ausência de comunicação verbal em crianças com transtornos do espectro autístico. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2009;14:487-90.
4. Magliaro FC, Scheuer CI, Assumpção-Júnior FB, Matas CG. Study of auditory evoked potentials in autism. Pro Fono. 2010;22:31-6.
5. Rosenblum SM, Arick JR, Krug DA, Stubbs EG, Young NB, Pelson RO. Auditory brainstem evoked responses in autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1980;10:215-25.
6. Russo NM, Hornickel J, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Biological changes in auditory function following training in children with autism spectrum disorders.. Behav Brain Funct. 2010;6:1-8.
7. Romero ACL, Gução ACB, Delecrode CB, Cardoso ACV, Misquiatti ARN, Frizzo ACF. Avaliação audiológica comportamental e eletrofisiológica no transtorno do espectro do autismo. Rev CEFAC. 2014;16:707-14.
8. Klin A. Autismo e síndrome de Asperger: uma visão geral. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;1:3-11.
9. Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Stapells DR. Principles and applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ, editores. Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 482-507.
10. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ. Electrophysiological measures of human auditory system maturation. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ, editores. Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 385-402.
11. Tremblay KL, Burkard RF. The aging auditory system. In: Burkard RF, Don M, Eggermont JJ, editores. Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 403-25.
12. Matas CG, Magliaro FCL. Introdução aos potenciais evocados auditivos e potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico. In: Bevilacqua MC, Martinez MAN, Balen AS, Pupo AC, Reis ACMB, Frota S, editores. Tratado de audiologia. São Paulo: Santos; 2013. p. 181-95.
13. Garcia M, Silveira A, Didoné D. Long latency auditory evoked potential in term and premature infants. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;18:16-20.
14. Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Korczak P. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear. 2008;29:285-313.
15. Hall JW. P300 response. In: Hall JW, editor. New handbook of auditory evoked responses. 2nd ed. Florida: Allyn & Bacon; 2006. p. 518-47.
16. O’Hearn K. Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Autism (BAERs). In: Volkmar FR, editor. Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 1-6.
17. Sharma A, Nash AA, Dorman MF. Cortical development, plasticity and re-organization in children with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord. 2009;42:272-9.
18. Datta H, Shafer VL, Morr ML, Kurtzberg D, Schwartz RG. Electrophysiological indices of discrimination of long-duration, phonetically similar vowels in children with typical and atypical language development. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53:757-77.
19. Tremblay K, Kraus N, Mcgee T, Ponton C, Brian O. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the n1-p2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear. 2001;22:79-100.
20. Silva LA, Couto MI, Magliaro FC, Tsuji RK, Bento RF, Carvalho AC, et al. Cortical maturation in children with cochlear implants: correlation between electrophysiological and behavioral measurement. PLoS One. 2017;2:e0171177.
21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;18(151):264-9.
22. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712-6.
23. Whitehouse AJ, Bishop DV. Do children with autism ‘switch off’ to speech sounds? An investigation using event-related potentials. Dev Sci. 2008;11:516-24.
24. Matas CG, Gonçalves IC, Magliaro FC. Audiologic and electrophysiologic evaluation in children with psychiatric disorders. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2009;75:130-8.
25. Orekhova EV, Stroganova TA, Prokofiev AO, Nygren G, Gillberg C, Elam M. The right hemisphere fails to respond to temporal novelty in autism: evidence from an ERP study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:520-9.
26. Russo NM, Zecker S, Trommer B, Chen J, Kraus N. Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009;39:1185-96.
27. Gomot M, Blanc R, Clery H, Roux S, Barthelemy C, Bruneau N. Candidate electrophysiological endophenotypes of hyper-reactivity to change in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41:705-14.
28. Andersson S, Posserud M, Lundervold AJ. Early and late auditory eventrelated potentials in cognitively high functioning male adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7:815-23.
29. Stroganova TA, Kozunov VV, Posikera IN, Galuta IA, Gratchev VV, Orekhova EV. Abnormal pre-attentive arousal in young children with autism spectrum disorder contributes to their atypical auditory behavior: an ERP study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69100.
30. Azouz HG, Kozou H, Khalil M, Abdou RM, Sakr M. The correlation between central auditory processing in autistic children and their language processing abilities. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78:2297-300.
31. Donkers FC, Schipul SE, Baranek GT, Cleary KM, Willoughby MT, Evans AM, et al. Attenuated auditory event-related potentials and associations with atypical sensory response patterns in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:506-23.
32. Gonzalez-Gadea ML, Chennu S, Bekinschtein TA, Rattazzi A, Beraudi A, Tripicchio P, et al. Predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neurophysiol. 2015;114:2625-36.
33. Sokhadze EM, Casanova MF, Tasman A, Brockett S. Electrophysiological and behavioral outcomes of berard Auditory Integration Training (AIT) in children with autism spectrum disorder. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016;41:405-20.
34. Galilee A, Stefanidou C, McCleery JP. Atypical speech versus non-speech detection and discrimination in 4- to 6- yr old children with autism spectrum disorder: an ERP study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181354.
35. Kamita MK. Brainstem evoked response auditory and long-latency auditory evoked potential in children with autism spectrum disorder [dissertation]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; 2017.
36. Lortie M, Proulx-Bégin L, Saint-Amour D, Cousineau D, Théoret H, Lepage JF. Brief report: biological sound processing in children with autistic spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:1904-9.
37. Silva LA, Magliaro FC, Carvalho AC, Matas CG. Maturation of long latency auditory evoked potentials in hearing children: systematic review. CoDAS. 2017;29:e20160107.
Submetido em:
15/08/2019
Aceito em:
22/04/2020
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email