The applicability of high resolution manometry in total laryngectomy
Aplicabilidade da manometria de alta resolução na laringectomia total
Taís Lima Santos; Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella; Renata Rangel Azevedo
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to measure the pressure of the pharynx and the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) at rest and during phonation in total laryngectomized patients, with different levels of voice production. Methods: four total laryngectomized individuals participated in the study, All patients underwent High Resolution Manometry (MAR) at rest and during phonation. After this process, a descriptive analysis of the results was performed. Results: we observed that during rest the patients had PES pressure below normal and this data may be related to changes in the muscular connections at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) especially the interruption of the cricopharyngeal plexus. During phonation, two patients presented higher UES pressure values during phonation, when compared to the values found at rest, suggesting that introduction of air into the esophagus is followed by pharyngoesophageal contraction and that during phonation the patients with good esophageal speech may develop more pressure in this region. Conclusion: Studies with a greater number of participants may help define, for example, subjects who may benefit from procedures such as cricopharyngeal myotomy or other medical conduct in order to facilitate the acquisition of esophageal voice in these patients.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: medir a pressão da faringe e do segmento faringo-esofágico (SFE), no repouso e durante a sua vibração (na produção de voz esofágica) em pacientes laringectomizados totais com diferentes níveis de produção de voz. Método: participaram do estudo quatro indivíduos laringectomizados totais, todos submetidos à Manometria de Alta Resolução (MAR) no repouso e durante a fonação. Após esse processo, foi realizada uma análise descritiva dos resultados. Resultados: em nosso estudo, observamos que, durante o repouso, os pacientes apresentaram pressão do esfíncter esofágico superior (EES) abaixo da normalidade, e este dado pode estar relacionado a alterações das conexões musculares, ao nível do EES, especialmente, a interrupção do plexo cricofaríngeo. Durante a fonação, dois pacientes apresentaram maiores valores de pressão do EES, em todas as fonações, quando comparado com os valores encontrados no repouso, sugerindo que a introdução de ar no esôfago é seguida de contração faringo-esofágica e que, durante a fonação, os pacientes bons falantes esofágicos, podem desenvolver maior pressão nesta região. Conclusão: estudos com maior número de participantes podem ajudar a definir, por exemplo, sujeitos que poderão se beneficiar de procedimentos como a miotomia do cricofaríngeo ou outra conduta médica, a fim de facilitar a aquisição de voz esofágica nesses pacientes.
Palavras-chave
Referências
1. Behlau M, Voz: O Livro do Especialista. 2 ed., cap 11, Disfonias por Câncer de Cabeça e Pescoço. p. 221-267. [ Links ]
2. Herbella FA, Armijo PR, Patti MG. A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders. Einstein (São Paulo). 2016;14(3):439-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082016MD3444. [ Links ]
3. Müller-Miny H, Diederich S, Bongartz G, Peters PE. Radiologic findings following supraglottic and total laryngectomy. Radiologe. 1991;31(7):324-31. PMid: 1924760. [ Links ]
4. Jacobi I, Timmermans AJ, Hilgers FJ, Van Den Brekel MW. Voice quality and surgical detail in post-laryngectomy tracheoesophageal speakers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(9):2669-79. PMid: 26395116. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3777-4. [ Links ]
5. Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH. Effects of radiation in normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(9):529-36. PMid: 12965273. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01191-4. [ Links ]
6. Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ, Million RR. The role of radiation therapy in laryngeal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990;40(3):150-65. PMid: 2110022. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.40.3.150. [ Links ]
7. Goyal RK, Martin SB, Shapiro J, Spechler SJ. The role of cricopharyngeus muscle in pharyngoesophageal disorders. Dysphagia. 1993;8(3):252-8. PMid: 8359047. DOI: 10.1007/BF01354547. [ Links ]
8. Sloane PM, Griffin JF, O’Dwyer TP, Griffin JM. Esophageal insufflation and videofluoroscopy for evaluation of esophageal speech in laryngectomy patients: clinical implications. Radiology. 1991;181(2):433-7. PMid: 1924785. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1924785. [ Links ]
9. Dantas RO, Aguiar-Ricz LN, Oliveira EC, Mello-Filho FV, Mamede RC. Influence of esophageal motility on esophageal speech of laryngectomized patients. Dysphagia . 2001;17(2):121-5. PMid: 11956837. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-001-0111-7. [ Links ]
10. Lippert D, Hoffman MR, Britt CJ, Jones CA, Hernandez J, Ciucci MR, McCulloch TM. Preliminary Evaluation of Functional Swallow After Total Laryngectomy Using High-Resolution Manometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(7)541-9. PMid: 26868604. DOI: 10.1177/0003489416629978. [ Links ]
11. Bentzen N, Guld A, Rasmussen H. X-ray video-tape studies of laryngectomized patients. J Laryngol Otol 1976;90:655-666. PMid: 956706. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100082554. [ Links ]
12. Kirchner JA, Scatliff JH, Dey FL, Shedd DP: The pharynx after laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1963;73:18-33. PMid: 916783. DOI: 10.1002/lary.1977.87.11.1884. [ Links ]
13. Teng Zhang, Siwei Bai, Cook I, Szczesniak M, Maclean J, Dokos S. Modeling of pharyngoesophageal phonation in total laryngectomy patients with preliminar validation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:2917-2920. PMid: 28268924. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591340. [ Links ]
14. Morgan DW, Hadley J, Willes G, Cheesman AD. Use of a portable manometer as a screening procedure in voice rehabilitation. J Laryngol Otol . 1992;106(4):353-5. PMid: 1613350. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100119474. [ Links ]
15. Perry A, Cheesman AD, McIvor J, Chalton R. A British experience of surgical voice restoration techniques as a secondary procedure following total laryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol . 1987;101(2):155-63. PMid: 3572218. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100101422. [ Links ]
16. Chone CT, Teixeira C, Andreollo NA, Spina AL, Barcellos IH, Quagliato E, Crespo AN. Botulinum toxin in speech rehabilitation with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(2):182-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000200012. [ Links ]
17. Chone CT, Seixas VO, Andreollo NA, Quagliato E, Barcellos IH, Spina AL, Crespo AN. Computerized manometry use to evaluate spasm in pharyngo-esophageal segment in patients with poor tracheoesophageal speech before and after treatment with botulinum toxin. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol . 2009;75(2):182-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992009000200005. [ Links ]
18. Horowitz JB, Sasaki CT. Effect of cricopharyngeus myotomy on postlaryngectomy pharyngeal contraction pressures. Laryngoscope . 1993;103(2):138-40. PMid: 8426504. DOI: 10.1002/lary.5541030203. [ Links ]
19. Van Weissenbruch R, Kunnen M, Albers FW, Van Cauwenberge PB, Sulter AM. Cineradiography of the pharyngoesophageal segment in postlaryngectomy patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 2000;109(3):311-9. PMid: 10737317. DOI: 10.1177/000348940010900314. [ Links ]
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email