Criteria for tracheostomy decannulation: literature review
Critérios para decanulação da traqueostomia: revisão de literatura
Gisele Chagas de Medeiros; Fernanda Chiarion Sassi; Camila Lirani-Silva; Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade.
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a literature review on the existing international criteria and protocols for tracheostomy decannulation. Research strategies: Literature review using the PubMed database with the English keywords “Tracheostomy”, “Weaning”, “Decannulation”, “Removal Tube”, “Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences”, “Intensive Care Units”, “Dysphagia”, “Swallowing”, “Deglutition” and “Deglutition Disorders “. Selection criteria: Studies published in the last five years (2012 to 2017); studies with human adult population (i.e. ages above 18 years); articles published in English; unrestricted full access articles; and research related to the objectives of the study. Data analysis: we analyzed sample characterization; professionals involved in the decannulation process; steps of the decannulation process; total time in days of tracheostomy use; total time in days to complete decannulation process; and failure factors to complete the decannulation process. Results: Most of the studies investigated tracheostomy decannulation in a sample of males with neurological impairments. The professionals involved in the decannulation process were doctors, speech therapists, physiotherapists and nurses. The most cited decannulation steps were: swallowing assessment; occlusion training; evaluation of air permeability; ability to manipulate secretion and exchange of cannula; cuff deflation and cough training; use of speech valve. Conclusion: Speech therapists are of great help during the decannulation process, since the assessment of swallowing was one of the decisive steps of the investigated studies. The processes of decannulation includes a multidisciplinary approach and should be performed by the cooperation between physicians, physiotherapists and speech therapists.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: Realizar um levantamento bibliográfico a respeito da decanulação da traqueostomia para verificar os fatores e protocolos utilizados em estudos internacionais. Estratégia de pesquisa: Estudo de revisão de literatura utilizando a base de dados PubMed com os descritores em língua inglesa “Tracheostomy”, “Weaning”, “Decannulation”, “Removal tube”, “Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences”, “Intensive Care Units”, “Dysphagia”, “Swallowing”, “Deglutition” e “Deglutition Disorders”. Critérios de seleção: Estudos publicados nos últimos cinco anos (2012 a 2017), com população acima de 18 anos de idade; pesquisas realizadas somente com seres humanos; artigos publicados em língua inglesa; artigos com acesso completo irrestrito; pesquisas relacionadas aos objetivos do estudo. Análise dos dados: foram analisados quanto aos seguintes itens: caracterização da amostra; profissionais envolvidos no processo da decanulação; etapas do processo de decanulação; tempo total em dias de uso da traqueostomia; tempo total em dias para concluir processo de decanulação; fatores de insucesso para conclusão do processo de decanulação. Resultados: A maior parte da população estudada foi do gênero masculino e com alterações neurológicas. Dos profissionais envolvidos no processo de decanulação, participaram em ordem decrescente médicos, fonoaudiólogos, fisioterapeutas e enfermeiros. As etapas da decanulação mais citadas foram: avaliação da deglutição; treino de oclusão; avaliação da permeabilidade de passagem do ar; habilidade de manipulação de secreção e troca de cânula; desinsuflação do cuff e treino de tosse; uso de válvula de fala. Além disso, obtiveram-se dados a respeito do tempo total de traqueostomia e de decanulação. Conclusão: A presença do fonoaudiólogo é extremamente importante no processo de decanulação, visto que a avaliação da deglutição foi a etapa mais citada nos estudos, sendo esse trabalho realizado em conjunto com médicos e fisioterapeutas.
Palavras-chave
Referencias
1 Metnitz PGH, Metnitz B, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Sorbo LD, Hoermann C, et al. Epidemiology of mechanical ventilation: analysis of the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(5):816-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1449-9. PMid:19288079. [ Links ]
2 Carvalho CRR, Toufen C Jr, Franca SA. Ventilação mecânica: princípios, análise gráfica e modalidades ventilatórias. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33(2, Suppl 2):54-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132007000800002. [ Links ]
3 Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1471-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200005183422002. PMid:10816184. [ Links ]
4 Cardoso LSF, Camacho EC, Lucena RV, Guerra AF, Rodrigues JAS. Drawx out orotracheal intubation and the indication of tracheostomy. Rev Fac Cienc Med Sorocaba. 2014;16(4):170-3. [ Links ]
5 Blot F, Melot C. Indications, timing, and techniques of tracheostomy in 152 French ICUs. Chest. 2005;127(4):1347-52. PMid:15821214. [ Links ]
6 Durbin CG Jr. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care. 2010;55(8):1056-68. PMid:20667153. [ Links ]
7 Santus P, Gramegna A, Radovanovic D, Raccanelli R, Valenti V, Rabbiosi D, et al. A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14(1):201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-201. PMid:25510483. [ Links ]
8 De Leyn P, Bedert L, Delcroix M, Depuydt P, Lauwers G, Sokolov Y, et al, Tracheostomy: clinical guidelines. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(3):412-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.018. PMid:17588767. [ Links ]
9 Zanata IL, Santos RS, Marques JM, Hirata GC, Santos DA. Speech-language pathology assessment for tracheal decannulation in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury. CoDAS. 2016;28(6):710-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162014086. PMid:28001270. [ Links ]
10 Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Singer D, Buckley B, Courtright B, Raj SS, et al. Swallowing disorders in trauma patients: impact of tracheostomy. Am Surg. 2007;73(11):1117-21. PMid:18092644. [ Links ]
11 Bianchi A, Barbara M, Monini S. Selective rehabilitative approach to neurological dysfunctions of the oro-pharyngo-laryngeal trivium. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(11):1172-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2014.936626. PMid:25315917. [ Links ]
12 Forte APFV. Impacto da traqueostomia na deglutição. In: Ferreira LP BD, Limongi SCO, editor. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2005. p. 405-9. [ Links ]
13 Corbin-Lewis KLJ, Sciortino KL. Anatomia clínica e fisiologia do mecanismo de deglutição. São Paulo: Cengage Learning; 2009. [ Links ]
14 Everitt E. Managing the weaning of a temporary tracheostomy. Nurs Times. 2016;112(20):17-9. PMid:27386708. [ Links ]
15 Pryor L, Ward E, Cornwell P, O’Connor S, Chapman M. Patterns of return to oral intake and decannulation post-tracheostomy across clinical populations in an acute inpatient setting. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51(5):556-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12231. PMid:26892893. [ Links ]
16 Welton C, Morrison M, Catalig M, Chris J, Pataki J. Can an interprofessional tracheostomy team improve weaning to decannulation times? A quality improvement evaluation. Can J Respir Ther. 2016;52(1):7-11. PMid:26909008. [ Links ]
17 Thomas S, Sauter W, Starrost U, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Time to decannulation and associated risk factors in the postacute rehabilitation of critically ill patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a cohort study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(4):501-7. PMid:27676204. [ Links ]
18 Gundogdu I, Ozturk EA, Umay E, Karaahmet OZ, Unlu E, Cakci A. Implementation of a respiratory rehabilitation protocol: weaning from the ventilator and tracheostomy in difficult-to-wean patients with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(12):1162-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1189607. PMid:27339104. [ Links ]
19 Mah JW, Staff II, Fisher SR, Butler KL. Improving decannulation and swallowing function: a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to post-tracheostomy care. Respir Care. 2017;62(2):137-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04878. PMid:28108683. [ Links ]
20 Pandian V, Miller CR, Schiavi AJ, Yarmus L, Contractor A, Haut ER, et al. Utilization of a standardized tracheostomy capping and decannulation protocol to improve patient safety. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(8):1794-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.24625. PMid:24473939. [ Links ]
21 Zanata IL, Santos RS, Hirata GC. Tracheal decannulation protocol in patients affected by traumatic brain injury. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18(2):108-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1363467. PMid:25992074. [ Links ]
22 Cohen O, Tzelnick S, Lahav Y, Stavi D, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Hain M, et al. Feasibility of a single-stage tracheostomy decannulation protocol with endoscopy in adult patients. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(9):2057-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25800. PMid:26607056. [ Links ]
23 Cochrane. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. London: Cochrane; 2011. [ Links ]
24 Luo C, Yang H, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Gong Z. Respiratory nursing interventions following tracheostomy in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;70(1):455-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9940-5. PMid:24728962. [ Links ]
25 Berney L, Wasserfallen JB, Grant K, Levivier M, Simon C, Faouzi M, et al. Acute neurorehabilitation: does a neurosensory and coordinated interdisciplinary programme reduce tracheostomy weaning time and weaning failure? Neuro Rehabilitation. 2014;34(4):809-17. PMid:24784495. [ Links ]
26 Warnecke T, Suntrup S, Teismann IK, Hamacher C, Oelenberg S, Dziewas R. Standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(7):1728-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a4626. PMid:23774336. [ Links ]
27 Hernández G, Ortiz R, Pedrosa A, Cuena R, Vaquero Collado C, Gonzalez Arenas P, et al. The indication of tracheotomy conditions the predictors of time to decannulation in critical patients. Med Intensiva. 2012;36(8):531-9. PMid:22398327. [ Links ]
28 Mathur NN, Sohliya LM. Pre-decannulation peristomal findings in tracheostomized cases and their effect on the success of decannulation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67(Suppl 1):91-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-014-0785-4. PMid:25621261. [ Links ]
29 Kim DH, Kang SW, Choi WA, Oh HJ. Successful tracheostomy decannulation after complete or sensory incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(6):601-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sc.2016.194. PMid:28117330. [ Links ]
30 Mitton K, Walton K, Sivan M. Tracheostomy weaning outcomes in relation to the site of acquired brain injury: a retrospective case series. Brain Inj. 2017;31(2):267-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2016.1250951. PMid:28102699. [ Links ]
31 Pasqua F, Nardi I, Provenzano A, Mari A. Lazio Regional Section IAoHP. Weaning from tracheostomy in subjects undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2015;10(1):35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40248-015-0032-1. PMid:26629342. [ Links ]
32 Tawfik KO, Houlton JJ, Compton W, Ying J, Khosla SM. Laryngotracheal reconstruction: a ten-year review of risk factors for decannulation failure. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(3):674-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.24963. PMid:25491233. [ Links ]
33 Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, Hida T, Machino M, et al. Characterizing the need for tracheostomy placement and decannulation after cervical spinal cord injury. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(7):1526-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2762-0. PMid:23558580. [ Links ]
34 Terra RM, Bibas BJ, Minamoto H, Waisberg DR, Tamagno MF, Tedde ML, et al. Decannulation in tracheal stenosis deemed inoperable is possible after long-term airway stenting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(2):440-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.037. PMid:23201102. [ Links ]
35 Schneider H, Hertel F, Kuhn M, Ragaller M, Gottschlich B, Trabitzsch A, et al. Decannulation and Functional Outcome After Tracheostomy in Patients with Severe Stroke (DECAST): a prospective observational study. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27(1):26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0390-y. PMid:28324263. [ Links ]
36 Shrestha KK, Mohindra S, Mohindra S. How to decannulate tracheostomised severe head trauma patients: a comparison of gradual vs abrupt technique. Nepal Med Coll J. 2012;14(3):207-11. PMid:24047017. [ Links ]
37 Budweiser S, Baur T, Jorres RA, Kollert F, Pfeifer M, Heinemann F. Predictors ofsuccessful decannulation using a tracheostomy retainer in patients with prolonged weaning and persisting respiratory failure. Respiration. 2012;84:469-76. [ Links ]
Submitted date:
26/09/2018
Accepted date:
20/02/2019
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email